<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Daily &#187; uniques</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/tag/uniques/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:03:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ask CEO Might Want to Look Up Definition of "Innovation" in the Dictionary.com</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080515/ask-4/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080515/ask-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dictionary.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Safka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lexico Publishing Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reference.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thesaurus.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080515/ask-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask, the little search engine that can’t, but someday hopes to, is committed to becoming a viable competitor in a market overwhelmingly dominated by Google and Yahoo. It has not, as CEO Jim Safka vehemently points out in an interview with Forbes today, ceded the search battle to anyone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask.com (IACI), the little search engine that can&#8217;t, but someday hopes to, is committed to becoming a viable competitor in a market overwhelmingly dominated by Google (GOOG) and Yahoo (YHOO).</p>
<p>It has not, as CEO Jim Safka vehemently points out in an interview with Forbes today, ceded the search battle to anyone. &#8220;It&#8217;s horses&#8211;t,&#8221; <a href="http://www.forbes.com/technology/2008/05/15/iac-ask-deal-tech-internet-cx_ag_0515techask.html">he told Forbes.com</a>. &#8220;It&#8217;s categorically not true. We&#8217;re more committed to our algorithm and engineers than ever. While Yahoo and Microsoft are paralyzed by trying to figure out what&#8217;s happening to their companies, we&#8217;re trying to figure out what&#8217;s next in search. You&#8217;re going to see more innovation coming out of Ask then ever before.&#8221;</p>
<p>The first evidence of that &#8220;innovation&#8221;? <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hsO0EBD8eaK8Ah8rzraZN5eb74UAD90LVUU00">Ask&#8217;s acquisition of that paragon of innovation Lexico Publishing Group LLC</a>, the owner of Dictionary.com, Thesaurus.com and Reference.com. With Lexico&#8217;s properties in its pocket, Ask expects to expand its audience to more than 145 million unique monthly users&#8211;an increase that the company claims would make it the ninth-largest Web property globally. Whether the company means among <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080307/ask_follo/">all users</a> or just <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080305/ask-3/">married women primarily living in the South and the Midwest</a> remains to be seen &#8230;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080515/ask-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNetBS</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080515/cbs-cnet/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080515/cbs-cnet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jana Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Les Moonves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outdoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proxy fight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080515/cbs-cnet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The Stars’ Address is CBS.” And now it’s CNET Networks’ as well. CBS this morning said it agreed to buy the Internet news and entertainment company for $1.8-billion in cash. The deal values CNET at about $11.50 per share--a 44.6% premium to yesterday’s closing price of $7.95. That’s $.50 more than the $11 Jana Partners, the investment management firm plotting a proxy fight for control of the company’s board, had hoped to squeeze out of CNET, so presumably even dissident investors are glad to see CBS stepping in here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
The leadership of CNET Networks Inc. (“CNET” or the “Company”) has presided over massive value destruction, with CNET’s shares declining (21)%, (52)% and (25)% in the one, two and three year periods ended March 28, 2008, respectively, compared to (1)%, 6% and 39% returns, respectively, for its stated benchmark peer index. CNET has also consistently underperformed numerous peers in profitability and growth, ranking last among these peers in key metrics, as set forth herein. This underperformance comes despite CNET’s premiere assets, including the tenth largest collection of Internet sites in the world and strong brands and content.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;<a href="http://www.janagroupinfo.com/whitePaper/0_index.php">Jana Partners, CNET: Value-Unlocking Change for All Shareholders</a>
</p></blockquote>
<p><img src='http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/05/cbsnet.jpg' alt='cbsnet.jpg' />&#8220;The Stars&#8217; Address is CBS.&#8221; <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-breaking-cbs-acquiring-cnet-for-18-billion/">And now it is CNET Networks&#8217;</a> (CNET) as well. CBS this morning said <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/080515/nyth075.html?.v=101">it agreed to buy the Internet news and entertainment laggard for $1.8 billion in cash</a>. The deal values CNET at about $11.50 per share&#8211;a 44.6% premium to yesterday&#8217;s closing price of $7.95.  That&#8217;s $.50 more than the $11 Jana Partners, the investment management firm <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080514/cnet-and-jana-the-battle-drags-on/">plotting a proxy fight for control of the company&#8217;s board,</a> had hoped to squeeze out of CNET, so presumably even dissident investors are glad to see CBS (CBS) stepping in here.</p>
<p>The deal, expected to close in the third quarter, will vault CBS into the top 10 Internet companies in the United States, with a combined 54 million unique visitors monthly, and about 200 million visitors worldwide.  <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/5/cbs_buying_cnet_for_1_8_billion">CBS CEO Les  Moonves says he expects interactive revenues to hit $1 billion by 2010</a>. &#8220;I think the ability of this company to grow together with us just made sense for right now,&#8221;  <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-cbs-cnet-interview-leslie-moonves/">Moonves told paidContent</a>. &#8220;We’ve stated our goals are to expand in three areas: content, Internet and outdoor. This accomplished two of the three.&#8221;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080515/cbs-cnet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSFT to YHOO: It's Always Tease, Tease, Tease</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080425/ddv20080425/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080425/ddv20080425/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Liddell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hostile takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Oppenheimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldwide Developers Conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080425/ddv20080425/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="video-wsj"><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={1522751257}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="320" height="240" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080425/ddv20080425/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let's Face It, AOL's Not Exactly the Cartier of Web Brands</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080425/aol-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080425/aol-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080425/aol-traffic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AOL’s ad revenue may be “falling off a cliff,” according to CNBC’s David Faber, but its traffic&#8217;s not half bad. AOL (TWX) said today that page views to its Web sites hit an all-time high in March, according to comScore (SCOR) Media Metrix. Page views grew 28% during the month, and are up 35% year-over-year. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL’s ad revenue may be “falling off a cliff,” <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=714150131&amp;play=1">according to CNBC’s David Faber</a>, but its traffic&#8217;s not half bad. AOL (TWX) said today that <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120908335534743525.html">page views to its Web sites hit an all-time high in March</a>, according to comScore (SCOR) Media Metrix. <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9928796-7.html">Page views grew 28% during the month, and are up 35% year-over-year. Unique visitors rose 11% year-over-year to 56.5 million</a>.  </p>
<p>AOL attributes the double-digit growth to a year-long redesign and rebranding effort, which ironically included a de-emphasizing of the AOL brand. &#8220;If I call a hip-hop site AOL Hip Hop,&#8221; said Bill Wilson, executive vice president of AOL Vertical Programming, &#8220;that just won&#8217;t resonate with consumers.&#8221;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080425/aol-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It's a Holiday in Zuckerburbia; It's Tough, Kid, But It's Life &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071011/ddv20071011/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071011/ddv20071011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Blodget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zuckerburbia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071011/ddv20071011/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="video-wsj"><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={1243524646}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="320" height="240" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071011/ddv20071011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Join the 'I Can't Wait to Get the Hell out of the Zuckerburbs' Network?</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071011/facebook-traffic-decline/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071011/facebook-traffic-decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Blodget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zuckerburbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zuckerburbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071011/facebook-traffic-decline/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well what do you know: the media buzz around Facebook doesn&#8217;t quite correlate with the site&#8217;s usage metrics. According to September comScore data, Zuckerburbia suffered a noticeable decline in unique visitors and page views both. Uniques are down 9.3%, page views 3.8%&#8211;this during a back-to-school month in which we should have seen both numbers spike.
What&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well what do you know: the media buzz around Facebook doesn&#8217;t quite correlate with the site&#8217;s usage metrics. According to September comScore data, <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/10/10/facebook-users-dip-could-this-be-true/">Zuckerburbia suffered a noticeable decline</a> in unique visitors and page views both. Uniques are down 9.3%, page views 3.8%&#8211;this during a back-to-school month in which we should have seen both numbers spike.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s going on here? Who knows. But it might be time for the company to stop reading its press and start thinking seriously about taking <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20071011/update-of-facebook-funding-update-googles-hail-mary-pass/">some of the cash being flashed its way</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Facebook has an enormous opportunity, and if the company doesn&#8217;t blow it, it could be worth every bit of $15 billion,&#8221; <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/10/facebooks-15b-m.html">writes Silicon Alley Insider&#8217;s Henry Blodget</a>.  &#8220;Part of not blowing it, however, means playing the odds, and when investors are literally begging you to take their cash (as they appear to be), the odds almost always favor taking some of it. Why? Because the economy might weaken tomorrow, taking Internet advertising spending down with it.  Because a competitor might develop an interesting solution that [CEO Mark] Zuckerberg might want to buy. Because the stock market might crash, converting Facebook&#8217;s $15 billion valuation into $5 billion (or less). Because Zuckerberg might do something stupid (sorry&#8211;this has to be considered a possibility). Because in all of these cases and more, it would be nice to have $500 million in the bank.&#8221;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071011/facebook-traffic-decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
