<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Daily &#187; status</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/tag/status/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twitter, Facebook and LiveJournal Back Up and Running After Attacks</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090806/twitter-users-once-again-sharing-mindless-minutiae-of-daily-life/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090806/twitter-users-once-again-sharing-mindless-minutiae-of-daily-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biz Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denial of Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LiveJournal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microblogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter, Facebook and LiveJournal are back up after being felled earlier this morning by denial-of-service attacks that rendered them inaccessible. It’s not yet known if the attacks were related, although, as a LiveJournal spokesperson notes, “it would be a huge coincidence” if they weren’t.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/08/ddos.jpg" alt="ddos" title="ddos" width="200" height="145" class="alignright size-full wp-image-22942" />Twitter, Facebook and LiveJournal are back up after being felled earlier this morning by denial-of-service attacks that rendered them inaccessible. It’s not yet known if the attacks were related, although, as a LiveJournal spokesperson notes, “it would be a huge coincidence” if they weren’t.</p>
<p><a href="http://status.twitter.com/post/157191978/ongoing-denial-of-service-attack">Twitter went down around 6:30 am PDT</a> and was live once again by 8:30 am PDT, but remains under attack. </p>
<p>&#8220;We are currently the target of a denial of service attack,&#8221; said Twitter co-founder Biz Stone. &#8220;Attacks such as this are malicious efforts orchestrated to disrupt and make unavailable services such as online banks, credit card payment gateways, and in this case, Twitter for intended customers or users. We are defending against this attack now and will continue to update our status blog as we defend and later investigate.&#8221;</p>
<p>Interestingly, Twitter wasn&#8217;t the only social media service targeted in this attack. Facebook and LiveJournal were hit as well. &#8220;Earlier this morning, Facebook encountered network issues related to an apparent distributed denial of service attack, that resulted in degraded service for some users,&#8221; the company said in a statement. &#8220;No user data was at risk and we have restored full access to the site for most users. We’re continuing to monitor the situation to ensure that users have the fast and reliable experience they’ve come to expect from Facebook.&#8221;</p>
<p>Said a LiveJournal spokesperson, &#8220;While we can’t be 100 percent sure it was the same attack as on Twitter, Facebook, et al., it would be a huge coincidence if they aren’t tied to one another.&#8221; As of this writing, the site was back up and running.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090806/twitter-users-once-again-sharing-mindless-minutiae-of-daily-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Was That You Were Saying About Mozilla Not Being an Arm of Google?</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081120/what-was-that-you-were-saying-about-mozilla-not-being-an-arm-of-google/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081120/what-was-that-you-were-saying-about-mozilla-not-being-an-arm-of-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitchell Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonprofit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=8732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mozilla renewed its search deal with Google last August, signing a three-year contract that ends in November 2011. Good thing too; the agreement was set to expire this month and if it had, Mozilla would have been forced to look elsewhere for the bulk of its income.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/11/googlefox.jpg" alt="" title="googlefox" width="266" height="130" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8733" />Mozilla renewed its search deal with Google (GOOG) last August, signing a three-year contract that ends in November 2011. Good thing too; the agreement was set to expire this month and if it had, Mozilla would have been forced to look elsewhere for the bulk of its income.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/documents/mf-2007-audited-financial-statement.pdf">the organization&#8217;s latest audited financial statement</a>, its revenue for 2007 totaled $75.1 million, up 13 percent from 2006&#8217;s $66.8 million. And 88 percent of that came came directly from Google, which pays Mozilla to be the default search engine in it Firefox browser. </p>
<p>So of Mozilla&#8217;s $75.1 million in 2007 revenue, $66 million was paid it by Google. That&#8217;s quite a sum. Large enough to pique the interest of the Internal Revenue Service, which is reviewing Mozilla&#8217;s nonprofit status and <a href="http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2008/11/19/sustainability-in-uncertain-times/">&#8220;challenging certain deductions,&#8221;</a> according to Mozilla Foundation chairperson Mitchell Baker. </p>
<p>An interesting turn of events for Mozilla, which this time last year was claiming it would walk away from Google if that&#8217;s what it took to remain independent. &#8220;We&#8217;ve spent a lot of time and energy making sure that Google understands that it cannot turn us into an arm of Google,&#8221; <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9044160">Baker said at the time</a>. &#8220;The things that make Mozilla and Firefox a success [are] the product, and the community that cares about it. First and foremost, we would protect those things,&#8221; Baker said. &#8220;If the protection of those things would come into conflict with Google, or any of our search partners, we would opt for the community who built Firefox and love Firefox&#8230;. There are other ways to make money from a browser.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good to know. Because you may need to pursue them when the IRS is through with you&#8230;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081120/what-was-that-you-were-saying-about-mozilla-not-being-an-arm-of-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
