<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Daily &#187; Paul Otellini</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/tag/paul-otellini/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:37:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Intel Hires Antitrust Expert as General Counsel</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091113/intel-hires-antitrust-expert-as-general-counsel/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091113/intel-hires-antitrust-expert-as-general-counsel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antitrust Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assistant attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Sewell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Melamed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=28964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Intel’s longstanding legal dispute with AMD resolved, Douglas Melamed, the company’s new general counsel, will have one less thing to worry about when he starts work--not that he lacks the experience to deal with it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/images5.jpeg" alt="images" title="images" width="93" height="92" class="alignright size-full wp-image-29005" />With Intel’s longstanding legal dispute with AMD (AMD) <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091112/intel-amd-settle-antitrust-dispute/">resolved</a>, Douglas Melamed the company’s new general counsel, will have one less thing to worry about when he starts work&#8211;not that he lacks the experience to deal with it. Melamed served as acting assistant attorney general in charge of the Justice Department&#8217;s antitrust division, where he worked from 1996 to 2001. He replaces longtime Intel (INTC) GC Bruce Sewell, who <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090915/former-intel-general-counsel-now-apple-general-counsel/">left the company to become general counsel of Apple</a> (AAPL) back in September. </p>
<p>&#8220;We’re extremely pleased to have Doug join the Intel team,&#8221; <a href="http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/2009/20091113corp.htm?iid=pr1_releasepri_20091113r">said Intel CEO Paul Otellini</a>. &#8220;His breadth of experience and legal expertise combined with his background in government are an outstanding fit for us.&#8221;</p>
<p>Melamed’s appointment must be quite a relief for Otellini and Intel, which, as I’ve noted here before, is <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090914/intel-general-council-bails-amid-antitrust-crisis/">grappling with some of the most important legal issues the company has ever faced</a>.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091113/intel-hires-antitrust-expert-as-general-counsel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Profit, Sales Beat Street</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091013/intel-profit-sales-beat-street/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091013/intel-profit-sales-beat-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bellwether]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expectations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FactSet Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third quarter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the world’s largest maker of computer chips, Intel is considered a bellwether for the wider industry. So the fact that the company’s latest revenue and profit numbers handily beat expectations is a very good sign indeed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/10/intc-150x150.jpg" alt="intc" title="intc" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-26560" />As the world&#8217;s largest maker of computer chips, Intel is considered a bellwether for the wider industry. So the fact that the company’s latest revenue and profit numbers handily beat expectations is a very good sign indeed.  </p>
<p>Posting third-quarter results Tuesday, Intel (INTC) said it earned 35 cents a share on revenue of $9.39 billion. That’s not quite what the company reported during the same period last year, when it saw earnings of 35 cents a share on revenue of $10.2 billion. But it’s much better than investors had been hoping for. Analysts had expected Intel to report earnings of 28 cents a share on revenue of $9 billion, according to a consensus survey by FactSet Research. </p>
<p>Not bad. Even better, the company bumped up its fourth-quarter guidance from sales of $9.7 billion to sales $10.6 billion. Consensus estimates have been calling for sales of $9.5 billion, according to FactSet Research data.</p>
<p>Intel&#8217;s rosier Q4 guidance suggests that the slow increase in end-market demand for PCs we’ve been seeing lately isn’t simply inventory refill but reflects an upswing in demand for end-customer goods. Perhaps that turnaround CEO Paul Otellini has been heralding for the last half year is not as far off as it might seem.</p>
<p>&#8220;Intel&#8217;s strong third-quarter results underscore that computing is essential to people&#8217;s lives, proving the importance of technology innovation in leading an economic recovery,&#8221; Intel CEO Paul Otellini said in an <a href="http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/INTC/746434006x0x324073/900dfad0-9fb3-4b64-a848-4de11b656432/Earnings_Release_Q32009_Final.pdf">earnings release</a>. &#8220;This momentum in the current economic climate, plus our product leadership, gives us confidence about our business prospects going forward.&#8221;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091013/intel-profit-sales-beat-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel CEO: Okay, Now the Worst Is Behind Us</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090922/intc-2/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090922/intc-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Developer Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales volume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like the worst is once again behind us. In remarks at the Intel Developer Forum on Tuesday, Intel CEO Paul Otellini said the PC industry is headed for recovery, albeit slowly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;The worst is now behind us.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/15/technology/companies/15chip.html"> Intel CEO Paul Otellini, April 14, 2009</a></p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/otellini_pauljpg-150x150.jpg" alt="otellini_pauljpg-150x150" title="otellini_pauljpg-150x150" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-25265" />Looks like the worst is once again behind us.  In remarks at the Intel Developer Forum on Tuesday, <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/businessbreakingnews/ci_13394614">Intel (INTC) CEO Paul Otellini said the PC industry is headed for recovery</a>, albeit slowly. Evidently, chip shipments are stablizing as PC shipments begin to pick up. </p>
<p>&#8220;This is an environment where we have had the worst recession in 70 years,&#8221; Otellini said. &#8220;The market is poised for a resurgence and we will see how 2010 plays out.&#8221;</p>
<p>And what, exactly, does that mean? Otellini says that he &#8220;personally&#8221; is betting that the PC industry sales volume will at least match what we saw in 2008. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125363727543031225.html">They’ll wind up &#8220;flat to slightly up,” he said.</a>  </p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090922/intc-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EMC Poaches Top Intel Exec</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090914/emc-poaches-top-intel-exec/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090914/emc-poaches-top-intel-exec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[386]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[486]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrivals departures feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief technology officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Enterprise Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Tucci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Gelsinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[successor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=24648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thirty years at Intel was evidently more than enough for Pat Gelsinger. He’s giving up his job as senior VP of the company’s Digital Enterprise Group to run EMC’s storage-products operations, The Wall Street Journal reports.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/gelsinger-150x150.jpg" alt="gelsinger" title="gelsinger" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-24649" />Thirty years at Intel was evidently <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/intel-is-said-to-plot-an-executive-overhaul/">more than enough for Pat Gelsinger</a>. He’s giving up his job as senior VP of the company’s Digital Enterprise Group to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125290003881507947.html">run EMC&#8217;s storage-products operations</a>, The Wall Street Journal reports. </p>
<p>The move, which will be effective immediately upon its announcement, is quite a blow for Intel (INTC). Gelsinger had done stints as the company’s chief technology officer and as head of its research division. He helped quarterback Intel&#8217;s 386 and 486 processors, played a major role in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Nehalem">the launch of  Nehalem</a> and had been considered a likely successor to Intel CEO Paul Otellini. Now he’s a contender for the top job at EMC (EMC) when CEO Joe Tucci decides to step down.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090914/emc-poaches-top-intel-exec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Earnings Better When Ignored</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090721/amd-earnings-much-better-when-ignored/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090721/amd-earnings-much-better-when-ignored/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirk Meyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macroeconomic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[margins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microprocessor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomson Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=21840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Intel CEO Paul Otellini said “the worst is now behind us,” he was clearly not referring to AMD. Posting earnings Tuesday afternoon, AMD reported an ugly loss of $330 million, or 49 cents a share--greater than the 47 cents analysts had been expecting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/amddownthumb.jpg" alt="amddownthumb" title="amddownthumb" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-21842" />When Intel (INTC) CEO Paul Otellini said <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090715/intel-earnings-rebound-or-recoil/">&#8220;the worst is now behind us,&#8221;</a> he was clearly not referring to AMD. <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/AMD-Reports-Second-Quarter-bw-3526097844.html?x=0&amp;.v=1">Posting earnings</a> Tuesday afternoon, AMD (AMD) reported a loss of $330 million, or 49 cents a share, compared with a year-earlier loss of $1.2 billion, or $1.97 a share. Revenue fell 13 percent to $1.18 billion. Analysts had been expecting a loss of 47 cents per share on revenue of $1.13 billion, according to a consensus survey by Thomson Reuters. </p>
<p>Oh, this was AMD&#8217;s 11th quarterly loss in a row.</p>
<p>So nothing much to get excited about here. Or in the company’s guidance. “Considering current macroeconomic conditions, limited visibility and historical seasonal patterns, AMD expects its Product Company revenue to be up slightly for the third quarter of 2009,” AMD CEO Dirk Meyer said in a statement. “New platform, microprocessor and graphics introductions planned for the second half of 2009 position us well to improve margins and meet our financial goals for the year.”</p>
<p>AMD shares were down more than 11 percent to $3.60 in after-hours trading.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090721/amd-earnings-much-better-when-ignored/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel: Don't Call It a Comeback</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090715/intel-earnings-rebound-or-recoil/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090715/intel-earnings-rebound-or-recoil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bellwether]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expectations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second quarter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=21381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three months after Intel CEO Paul Otellini announced that the PC market had reached bottom, the company’s latest financials, which handily beat expectations, seem to have proven him right. “The worst is now behind us,” he noted. And the tech economy is showing signs of muted recovery. The question is: Is that recovery sustainable?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/rebound.jpeg" alt="rebound" title="rebound" width="150" height="113" class="alignright size-full wp-image-21382" /></p>
<p>Three months after Intel CEO Paul Otellini announced that the PC market had reached bottom, <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090714/intel-blows-doors-off-estimates/">the company’s latest financials</a>, which handily beat expectations, seem to have proven him right. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/15/technology/companies/15chip.html">&#8220;The worst is now behind us,&#8221;</a> he said. And the tech economy is showing signs of muted recovery. </p>
<p>The question is: Is that recovery sustainable? </p>
<p>The answer, according to Otellini, is yes. “The second quarter was clearly better than we expected,&#8221; he told analysts on a <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/148790-intel-q2-2009-earnings-call-transcript?page=-1">conference call</a>. &#8220;Customers signaled increased confidence in their ordering patterns.&#8221; After months of global recession, Otellini noted that the company&#8217;s second-quarter results &#8220;reflect improving conditions&#8221; in the PC market.</p>
<p>“Intel is seeing a firming up in demand,” he added. “It&#8217;s encouraging news for the industry.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed. Intel is a bellwether for the tech sector; as goes Intel, so goes the industry. So, if Intel says demand is beginning to return to normal seasonal patterns, then the industry may truly be stabilizing. That said, there’s still quite a bit of economic volatility&#8211;enough to suggest that it might be wise not to read too much into Intel&#8217;s performance.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2009/07/15/intel-earnings-analysts-takeaways-hint-at-frugal-consumers/">Said analysts at JP Morgan</a>: “Although the Intel quarter was clearly spectacular on all fronts, we continue to believe the upside was driven by inventory replenishment as we have not seen any evidence of increasing PC demand.”</p>
<p>Shares of Intel (INTC) are trading up 6.77 percent at $17.97 this morning.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090715/intel-earnings-rebound-or-recoil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Blows Doors Off Estimates</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090714/intel-blows-doors-off-estimates/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090714/intel-blows-doors-off-estimates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashok Kumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collins Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expectations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macro-economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market close]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomson Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuesday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=21344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Intel’s  latest earnings are truly an indication of how the tech industry is holding up in the econalypse, then the tech industry isn’t doing too badly (though, obviously, it has seen better days). After market close Tuesday, the chip behemoth posted second-quarter results far in excess of expectations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/intc.jpg" alt="intc" title="intc" width="150" height="147" class="alignright size-full wp-image-21355" />If Intel’s latest earnings are truly an indication of how the tech industry is holding up in the econalypse, then the tech industry isn’t doing too badly (though, obviously, it has seen better days). After market close Tuesday, the chip behemoth posted <a href="http://www.intc.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=396431">second-quarter results</a> far in excess of expectations. </p>
<p>Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters expected Intel (INTC) to report revenue of $7.3 billion and a profit of eight cents per share. Instead the company reported revenue of $8 billion and non-GAAP profits of 18 cents (<a href="http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/INTC/681074619x0x306698/35939b1f-8286-4762-bc77-591c1a467394/Q22009EarningsReleaseWithTables.pdf">PDF</a>). And it predicted third-quarter revenue above Wall Street&#8217;s expectations.</p>
<p>In a statement, CEO Paul Otellini said the results &#8220;reflect improving conditions in the PC market segment with our strongest first- to second-quarter growth since 1988 and a clear expectation for a seasonally stronger second half.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now admittedly, Intel did post earnings of 28 cents a share in the same period last year. So its fortunes clearly declined in the months that followed. That said, the company appears to be on the rebound after hitting <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090512/intel-ceo-the-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-squint-just-slightly/">the bottom Otellini declared back in April</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Basically, very strong numbers for the quarter and guidance is in line with seasonal trends,&#8221; Collins Stewart analyst Ashok Kumar told Reuters.&#8221; It&#8217;s an extremely strong number given the macro economic backdrop. Despite those headwinds, the company delivered significant upside to both guidance as well as as expectations. The big unknown is whether it&#8217;s anything more than inventory replenishment.&#8221;</p>
<p>Intel shares are on the upswing on the news.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090714/intel-blows-doors-off-estimates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Commission Overclocks Intel Antitrust Fine</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090513/european-commission-overclocks-intel-antitrust-fine/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090513/european-commission-overclocks-intel-antitrust-fine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-competitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash flow positive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dividend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone OS 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X Snow Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC makers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Schiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seagate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsors of Tomorrow"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldwide Developers Conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=17624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="video-wsj"><object width="380" height="216"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=1A1FDAB4-C129-42F8-8B69-300418430809&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={1A1FDAB4-C129-42F8-8B69-300418430809}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="380" height="216" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090513/european-commission-overclocks-intel-antitrust-fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel to Change "Sponsors of Tomorrow" Slogan to "Sponsors of the European Union"</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090513/eu-overclocks-intel-antitrust-fine/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090513/eu-overclocks-intel-antitrust-fine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 10:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commissioner for Competition Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neelie Kroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=17563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ouch. European regulators slapped Intel with an antitrust fine and, as expected, it’s a large one--a record $1.45 billion, which dwarfs even the $1.2 billion fine levied against Microsoft in 2008. The largest ever assessed for monopoly abuse, the fine follows charges that Intel abused its market dominance by illegally inducing PC manufacturers to use its chips over those of rival AMD.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/05/ec_intc.jpg" alt="ec_intc" title="ec_intc" width="200" height="200" class="alignright size-full wp-image-17571" />Ouch.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124220736617414635.html">European regulators slapped Intel with an antitrust fine</a> and, as expected, it’s a large one&#8211;<a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/745&#038;type=HTML&#038;aged=0&#038;language=EN&#038;guiLanguage=en">a record $1.45 billion</a>, which dwarfs even the $1.2 billion fine levied against Microsoft in 2008. The largest ever assessed for monopoly abuse, the fine follows charges that Intel (INTC) abused its market dominance by illegally inducing PC manufacturers to use its chips over those of rival AMD (AMD).</p>
<p>&#8220;The Commission finds that Intel did not compete fairly, frustrating innovation and reducing consumer welfare in the process,&#8221; Neelie Kroes, the European Commissioner for Competition Policy, said at a news conference announcing the fine. &#8220;Given that Intel has harmed millions of European consumers by deliberately acting to keep competitors out of the market for over five years, the size of the fine should come as no surprise.&#8221;  </p>
<p>And after all, it could have been worse. The $1.45 billion assessment is quite a bit less than the maximum fine the EC could have levied&#8211;10 percent of a company’s annual revenue. Given that Intel made $37.6 billion in 2008, <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090511/ec-to-beat-intel-into-guacamole/">the EC could have slapped it with a penalty of $4 billion</a>.  </p>
<p>Intel denied any wrongdoing and said it would appeal. &#8220;Intel takes strong exception to this decision,” <a href="http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20090513corp.htm?iid=pr1_releasepri_20090513r">CEO Paul Otellini said in a statement released immediately after the announcement</a>. “We believe the decision is wrong and ignores the reality of a highly competitive microprocessor marketplace&#8211;characterized by constant innovation, improved product performance and lower prices. There has been absolutely zero harm to consumers. Intel will appeal. We do not believe our practices violated European law. The natural result of a competitive market with only two major suppliers is that when one company wins sales, the other does not.”</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090513/eu-overclocks-intel-antitrust-fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel CEO: The Future's So Bright, I Gotta Squint Just Slightly</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090512/intel-ceo-the-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-squint-just-slightly/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090512/intel-ceo-the-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-squint-just-slightly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 22:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal patterns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=17541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The worst is now behind us.” Intel CEO Paul Otellini made that brave statement back in April. And not a month later, it's proving true. Commenting on Intel’s business during an event for financial analysts Tuesday, Otellini said, “Looking at order patterns, billings patterns, it’s a little better than expected.“]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/05/otellini_pauljpg-150x150.jpg" alt="otellini_pauljpg" title="otellini_pauljpg" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-17542" /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/15/technology/companies/15chip.html">&#8220;The worst is now behind us.&#8221;</a> Intel (INTC) CEO Paul Otellini made that brave statement back in April. And not a month later, it seems to be proving true. Commenting on Intel’s business during an event for financial analysts Tuesday, Otellini said, <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/30708365">&#8220;Looking at order patterns, billings patterns, it&#8217;s a little better than expected.&#8221;</a></p>
<p><em> A little better than expected.</em> </p>
<p>Not the most exuberant of pronouncements, but when you’re coming off a first quarter in which profit fell 55 percent, it’s cause for a little optimism. Especially, since Otellini says demand is slowly slipping back into its seasonal patterns. &#8220;We will see seasonality in the second half,&#8221; <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124216072818612129.html">he said</a>. “I&#8217;m getting increasingly comfortable that the dip here is not as aggressive as they are showing.”</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090512/intel-ceo-the-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-squint-just-slightly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pssst, Buddy&#8230; Wanna Buy Sun Microsystems?</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090326/pssst-buddy-wanna-buy-sun-microsystems/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090326/pssst-buddy-wanna-buy-sun-microsystems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architectures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=15433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel CEO Paul Otellini has confirmed what “people familiar with the matter” and industry observers have been saying for months now. Sun  is eager to find a buyer and has offered itself for sale to IBM and pretty much anyone else who might have the cash to acquire it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/03/otellini_paul.jpg" alt="otellini_paul" title="otellini_paul" width="190" height="197" class="alignright size-full wp-image-15435" />Intel CEO Paul Otellini has confirmed what <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123735970806267921.html">&#8220;people familiar with the matter&#8221;</a> and <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090226/buying-spree-the-sequel-why-not-ibmsun-googletwitter-microsoftanyone/">industry observers</a> have been saying for months now. Sun (JAVA) is eager to find a buyer and has offered itself  for sale to IBM (IBM) and pretty much anyone else who might have the cash to acquire it. “I can tell you that Sun was shopped around the Valley and around the world in the last few months,” Otellini told Intel (INTC) employees during a recent meeting, <a href="http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/50863/000095013409005968/f51917a3exv99w2.htm">according to an SEC filing</a>. “A lot of companies got calls or visits on buying some or all the assets of the company. It looks like IBM is in the hunt now. And at a hundred and some odd percent premium, I suspect they’ll get it&#8230;.I think IBM is trying to consolidate architectures. IBM has the strongest Java license in the industry. By picking up Sun&#8211;which is the creator of Java&#8211;they really consolidate their position not just in Linux, but also in Java&#8230;.Is it good or bad for us? I don&#8217;t know. I&#8217;d rather have Sun be independent, I guess.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sadly for Otellini, that&#8217;s not likely to be the case. Sources close to the company tell Bloomberg that IBM is knee-deep in talks to acquire Sun and that <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=abD2S1k40Q4E&amp;refer=us">a deal may be announced as soon as next week</a>.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090326/pssst-buddy-wanna-buy-sun-microsystems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iSuppli Announces Laptopaleolithic Age</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081223/isuppli-announces-laptopaleolithic-age/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081223/isuppli-announces-laptopaleolithic-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSuppli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third quarter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=10171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“We believe that the shipment crossover of desktop PCs to mobile PCs will now happen this year and not next year, as we originally anticipated.” Intel CEO Paul Otellini made that prediction this past April, and it would appear he’s been proven right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://voices.allthingsd.com/files/2008/12/laptoppile.jpg" alt="" title="laptoppile" width="200" height="122" class="alignright size-full wp-image-7074" />&#8220;We believe that the shipment crossover of desktop PCs to mobile PCs will now happen this year and not next year, as we originally anticipated.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/72435-intel-q1-2008-earnings-call-transcript?page=-1&amp;find=think&amp;">Intel (INTC) CEO Paul Otellini made that prediction this past April</a>, and it would appear he&#8217;s been proven right. Global shipments of notebooks surpassed those of desktop PCs for the first time ever in the third quarter, according iSuppli Corp. The market-research firm&#8217;s metrics reveal that notebook shipments rose almost 40 percent in the third quarter of 2008 over the same period in 2007, to 38.6 million units. Meanwhile, desktop shipments fell by 1.3 percent to 38.5 million units.</p>
<p>While the mobile computing era was obviously born quite a while back, iSuppli&#8217;s report would seem to make its advent official. &#8220;This marks a major event in the PC market because it marks the start of the age of the notebook,&#8221; <a href="http://www.isuppli.com/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=19823">said Matthew Wilkins, principal analyst for compute platforms at iSuppli</a>. &#8220;The notebook PC is no longer a tool only for the business market, or a computer for the well-off consumer; it&#8217;s now a computer for everyone. While the third quarter will be remembered as the time when the scale of the global economic/credit crunch truly became apparent, the PC market managed to deliver strong unit shipment growth during the period.&#8221;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081223/isuppli-announces-laptopaleolithic-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel to Investors: Save Your Tears for AMD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080716/intc/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080716/intc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080416/intel-to-investors-save-your-tears-for-amd/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, someone forgot to tell Intel (INTC) about the recession. The company reported a sharp rise in profit on Tuesday in the face of a flaccid U.S. economy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, someone forgot to tell Intel (INTC) about the recession. The company <a href="http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/INTC/359855073x0x213239/7efbf250-c9ef-42c2-baac-2eb77e3948f5/Q208FinalEarningsRelease.pdf">reported a sharp rise in profit</a> on Tuesday in the face of a flaccid U.S. economy. Revenue rose 9 percent to $9.5 billion from the year-ago quarter. And net income rose 25 percent to $1.6 billion, or 28 cents a share&#8211;well above the expectations of Wall Street analysts, who had projected earnings of 25 cents a share. </p>
<p>Best of all, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/techinvestor/earnings/2008-04-15-intel_N.htm">Intel predicted more strong sales</a> in the months to come. &#8220;As we enter the second half, demand remains strong for our microprocessor and chipset products in all segments and all parts of the globe,&#8221; Intel CEO Paul Otellini said in a statement. Comments like that, coupled with Intel&#8217;s strong Q2 earnings, should go a long way toward <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/16/technology/16chip.html">reassuring investors that the technology sector isn&#8217;t succumbing to the economic downturn</a>. At least until <a href="http://www.forbes.com/technology/2008/07/16/amd-earnings-intel-tech-enter-cx_bc_0716amd.html">AMD  reports  second quarter results on Thursday</a>. Analysts expect AMD (AMD) to post a loss of 52 cents per share.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080716/intc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel, Not ARM, Inside &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080602/ddv20080602/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080602/ddv20080602/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H-P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handheld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marvell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toolbar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080602/ddv20080602/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="video-wsj"><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={1586319176}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="320" height="240" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080602/ddv20080602/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel CEO: Atom's Da Bomb</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080602/intel-ceo-atoms-da-bomb/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080602/intel-ceo-atoms-da-bomb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handheld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marvell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080602/intel-ceo-atoms-da-bomb/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel's putting the mobile phone market on speed dial. Two years after selling off its chip business for mobile handhelds and cellphones to Marvell, the world's largest chip-maker is turning its attention once again to the mobile phone market with dollar signs in its eyes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/06/otellinin_clean_suit.jpg' class='centered' style="border: 1px solid #000;" alt='otellinin_clean_suit.jpg' /> Intel&#8217;s putting the mobile phone market on speed dial. Two years after selling off its chip business for mobile handhelds and cellphones to Marvell, the world&#8217;s largest chip-maker is turning its attention once again to the mobile phone market with dollar signs in its eyes. Seems the company can no longer tolerate the idea of <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/01/intels-chief-on-strategy-globalization-and-the-price-of-oil/?ref=technology">ARM</a>, and not Intel (INTC), inside many of the mobile phones on the market today.</p>
<p>In an interview with the Financial Times, Intel CEO Paul Otellini (<em>pictured above</em>) said <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/814c6a18-303c-11dd-86cc-000077b07658.html">he&#8217;s confident the company&#8217;s new Atom processor will expand Intel&#8217;s reach into the mobile phone market</a>. &#8220;If you accept that the value proposition of the high end of the mobile-phone market is full Internet access that happens to have voice, my view is that it&#8217;s easier to add voice to a small computer than vice-versa,&#8221; Otellini told the FT, noting that the company&#8217;s expertise in PC chips will come in handy in making inroads into markets where devices are becoming increasingly more PC-like. Among them, those for televisions, ultra low-cost PCs, embedded controllers  and, of course, smartphones. &#8220;We are bringing an element of computing into large markets, many of which are larger than the PC business, certainly in terms of units,&#8221; said Otellini. &#8220;Each of these four markets is a $10 billion opportunity by 2010 or 2011.&#8221;</p>
<p>Message to ARM: We&#8217;re coming for you.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080602/intel-ceo-atoms-da-bomb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
