<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Daily &#187; order</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/tag/order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Intel CEO: The Future's So Bright, I Gotta Squint Just Slightly</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090512/intel-ceo-the-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-squint-just-slightly/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090512/intel-ceo-the-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-squint-just-slightly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 22:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal patterns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=17541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The worst is now behind us.” Intel CEO Paul Otellini made that brave statement back in April. And not a month later, it's proving true. Commenting on Intel’s business during an event for financial analysts Tuesday, Otellini said, “Looking at order patterns, billings patterns, it’s a little better than expected.“]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/05/otellini_pauljpg-150x150.jpg" alt="otellini_pauljpg" title="otellini_pauljpg" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-17542" /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/15/technology/companies/15chip.html">&#8220;The worst is now behind us.&#8221;</a> Intel (INTC) CEO Paul Otellini made that brave statement back in April. And not a month later, it seems to be proving true. Commenting on Intel’s business during an event for financial analysts Tuesday, Otellini said, <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/30708365">&#8220;Looking at order patterns, billings patterns, it&#8217;s a little better than expected.&#8221;</a></p>
<p><em> A little better than expected.</em> </p>
<p>Not the most exuberant of pronouncements, but when you’re coming off a first quarter in which profit fell 55 percent, it’s cause for a little optimism. Especially, since Otellini says demand is slowly slipping back into its seasonal patterns. &#8220;We will see seasonality in the second half,&#8221; <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124216072818612129.html">he said</a>. “I&#8217;m getting increasingly comfortable that the dip here is not as aggressive as they are showing.”</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090512/intel-ceo-the-futures-so-bright-i-gotta-squint-just-slightly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can’t Catch Me… I’m the Generic C!@lis Man</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080514/would-you-consider-230-milllion-in-generic-clis/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080514/would-you-consider-230-milllion-in-generic-clis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanford Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spamford Wallace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080514/would-you-consider-230-milllion-in-generic-clis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hammer has fallen once again on Stanford “Spamford” Wallace. A federal judge in Los Angeles yesterday awarded MySpace a $230 million judgment against Wallace who, with partner Walter Rines, broadcast some 730,000 junk messages to MySpace members in October of 2006. The judgment is believed to be the largest anti-spam award to date, not that it really matters, since MySpace is unlikely to collect it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/05/spam.jpg' class='centered' style="border: 1px solid #000;" alt='spam.jpg' />The hammer has fallen once again on Stanford &#8220;Spamford&#8221; Wallace. A federal judge in Los Angeles yesterday awarded MySpace <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5ieedXWHP7obv4SfKWxyAIwh1m5nwD90L6QC00">a $230 million judgment against Wallace</a> who, with partner Walter Rines, broadcast some 730,000 junk messages to MySpace members in October of 2006.</p>
<p>The judgment is believed to be <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7399868.stm">the largest anti-spam award to date</a>. Not that it really matters, because MySpace (NWS) is unlikely to collect it. Wallace&#8211;who was by some estimates responsible for 80% of the spam on the Net back in his heyday&#8211;has rarely paid the judgments against him. Moreover, he <a href="http://spamkings.oreilly.com/archives/2005/07/wheres_sanford_1.html">has a bad habit of disappearing</a> at the first sign of legal trouble.</p>
<p>And that appears to be exactly what he&#8217;s done here. Because the $230 million award given MySpace in this case is a default judgment meted out after Wallace failed to appear in court. &#8220;It is &#8230; a defendant&#8217;s responsibility to respond to discovery, obey court orders and avoid dilatory tactics,&#8221; <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9930977-7.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20">the court wrote in its order</a>. &#8220;Taking all of the above factors into account, a default is appropriate. The court finds that Wallace&#8217;s noncompliance is due to willfulness, fault or bad faith. &#8230; Wallace has had every opportunity to avoid the sanction of default. (He) has never provided any explanation for his behavior to the court.&#8221;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080514/would-you-consider-230-milllion-in-generic-clis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Million 3G iPhones&#8211;That Sounds Like a Nice Big Round Number, Doesn't It?</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080328/gartner-backtrack/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080328/gartner-backtrack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gartner Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080328/gartner-backtrack/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gartner Group, whose analyst Kevin Delaney was widely quoted earlier this week claiming Apple had ordered 10 million 3G iPhones from its manufacturing partners in Asia, has clarified that claim a bit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2007/07/iphone-launch-day-1-tuesday-15.jpg' class='centered' style="border: 1px solid #000;" />Gartner Group (IT), whose analyst Kevin Delaney was widely quoted earlier this week <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080327/3giphone/">claiming Apple (AAPL) had ordered 10 million 3G iPhones</a> from its manufacturing partners in Asia, has clarified that claim a bit.</p>
<p>Turns out Delaney has no idea whether or not Apple placed such an order. “We have not got confirmation that an order has been placed,” <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207000174">Gartner’s Bob Hafner told InformationWeek</a>, adding, &#8220;If Apple was to place an order, then 10 million would be a reasonable number.&#8221;  </p>
<p>&#8220;If Apple was to place an order, then <em>10 million would be a reasonable number</em>.&#8221; Pfttttt &#8230;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080328/gartner-backtrack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
