<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Daily &#187; national security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/tag/national-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>China to YouTube: YouBlocked</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090324/china-to-youtube-youblocked/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090324/china-to-youtube-youblocked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beat cops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blockage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communist Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtering system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qin Gang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tibetans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=15313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China’s access to YouTube, which has been intermittent at best, ceased entirely late Monday, apparently choked off by the country’s legendary Internet filtering system. There’s no formal explanation yet for the block, though it may be in response to a seven-minute video posted to YouTube last week showing Chinese soldiers brutally beating Tibetans last March after the riots in Lhasa. China, after all, isn’t renowned for its tolerance of free expression or dissident speech.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/03/virtualpolicejpg-300x187.jpg" alt="China Web Police" title="China Web Police" width="300" height="187" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-15314" />China&#8217;s access to YouTube, which has been intermittent at best, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7961069.stm">ceased entirely late Monday</a>, apparently choked off <a href="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/filtering/china/">by the country&#8217;s legendary Internet filtering system</a>. &#8220;YouTube is currently being blocked in China,&#8221; Google said in a statement. &#8220;We do not know the reason for the blockage, but we are working to restore access to YouTube in China as quickly as possible.&#8221;</p>
<p>As Google (GOOG) notes, there&#8217;s no formal explanation yet for the block, though it <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/chinajournal/2009/03/25/chinas-youtube-block-a-tibet-connection/">may be in response to a seven-minute video posted to YouTube last week</a> showing Chinese soldiers brutally beating Tibetans last March after the riots in Lhasa.  China, after all, isn&#8217;t renowned for its tolerance of free expression or dissident speech. Remember, <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070828/china-virtual-cops/">animated beat cops patrol the nation’s 13 top portals</a>, warning citizens away from material the ruling Communist Party finds politically or morally threatening.</p>
<p>Asked to comment on the block, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Qin Gang claimed Beijing was unaware of it. “Many people have a false impression that the Chinese government fears the Internet. In fact it is just the opposite,” <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSTRE52N1VN20090324">he told reporters</a>. &#8220;China&#8217;s Internet is open enough, but also needs to be regulated by law in order to prevent the spread of harmful information and for national security.&#8221; </p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090324/china-to-youtube-youblocked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whoops. False Positive. Sorry 'Bout That &#8230; Heh Heh.</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081013/whoops-false-positive-sorry-bout-that-heheh/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081013/whoops-false-positive-sorry-bout-that-heheh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavior detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false positives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Research Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=6387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It figures. Not only are the predictive data mining and behavioral surveillance efforts through which the government hopes to identify terrorists a threat to privacy, they don’t really work, either. In a 352-page report published last week, the National Research Council said data mining and behavior detection aren’t nearly as useful as their proponents claim.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/10/tia_logo_large.jpg" alt="" title="tia_logo_large" width="200" height="205" class="alignright size-full wp-image-6388" />It figures. Not only are the predictive data mining and behavioral surveillance efforts through which the government hopes to identify terrorists a threat to privacy, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10059987-38.html">they don&#8217;t really work</a>, either. </p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12452">a 352-page</a> report published last week, the National Research Council said data mining and behavior detection aren&#8217;t nearly as useful as their proponents claim. In fact, they&#8217;re of dubious scientific merit  and have &#8220;enormous potential&#8221; for infringing on law-abiding Americans&#8217; privacy. &#8220;Automated identification of terrorists through data mining (or any other  known methodology) is neither feasible as an objective nor desirable as a goal of technology development efforts,&#8221; the Council found. &#8220;Even in well-managed programs, such tools are likely to return significant rates of false positives, especially if the tools are highly automated.&#8221;</p>
<p>While not an explicit condemnation of the techniques at issue here, the report does recommend that the government evaluate the effectiveness and lawfulness of these data mining and behavior-detection programs it&#8217;s so keen on before implementing them, and periodically thereafter. Said the Council, &#8220;History demonstrates that measures taken in the name of improving national security, especially in response to new threats or crises, have often proven to be both ineffective and offensive to the nation&#8217;s values and traditions of liberty and justice.&#8221;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081013/whoops-false-positive-sorry-bout-that-heheh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
