<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Daily &#187; IRS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/tag/irs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:03:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What Was That You Were Saying About Mozilla Not Being an Arm of Google?</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081120/what-was-that-you-were-saying-about-mozilla-not-being-an-arm-of-google/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081120/what-was-that-you-were-saying-about-mozilla-not-being-an-arm-of-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitchell Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonprofit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=8732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mozilla renewed its search deal with Google last August, signing a three-year contract that ends in November 2011. Good thing too; the agreement was set to expire this month and if it had, Mozilla would have been forced to look elsewhere for the bulk of its income.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/11/googlefox.jpg" alt="" title="googlefox" width="266" height="130" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8733" />Mozilla renewed its search deal with Google (GOOG) last August, signing a three-year contract that ends in November 2011. Good thing too; the agreement was set to expire this month and if it had, Mozilla would have been forced to look elsewhere for the bulk of its income.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/documents/mf-2007-audited-financial-statement.pdf">the organization&#8217;s latest audited financial statement</a>, its revenue for 2007 totaled $75.1 million, up 13 percent from 2006&#8217;s $66.8 million. And 88 percent of that came came directly from Google, which pays Mozilla to be the default search engine in it Firefox browser. </p>
<p>So of Mozilla&#8217;s $75.1 million in 2007 revenue, $66 million was paid it by Google. That&#8217;s quite a sum. Large enough to pique the interest of the Internal Revenue Service, which is reviewing Mozilla&#8217;s nonprofit status and <a href="http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2008/11/19/sustainability-in-uncertain-times/">&#8220;challenging certain deductions,&#8221;</a> according to Mozilla Foundation chairperson Mitchell Baker. </p>
<p>An interesting turn of events for Mozilla, which this time last year was claiming it would walk away from Google if that&#8217;s what it took to remain independent. &#8220;We&#8217;ve spent a lot of time and energy making sure that Google understands that it cannot turn us into an arm of Google,&#8221; <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9044160">Baker said at the time</a>. &#8220;The things that make Mozilla and Firefox a success [are] the product, and the community that cares about it. First and foremost, we would protect those things,&#8221; Baker said. &#8220;If the protection of those things would come into conflict with Google, or any of our search partners, we would opt for the community who built Firefox and love Firefox&#8230;. There are other ways to make money from a browser.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good to know. Because you may need to pursue them when the IRS is through with you&#8230;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081120/what-was-that-you-were-saying-about-mozilla-not-being-an-arm-of-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do You Accept the iPhone as Your Personal Savior?</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070625/ddv20070625/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070625/ddv20070625/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070625/ddv20070625/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="video-wsj"><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={1029828942}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="320" height="240" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070625/ddv20070625/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You've Found a Golden Runic Hammer! Click Here to Complete Your 1099 &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070625/death-virtual-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070625/death-virtual-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EverQuest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Economic Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070625/death-virtual-taxes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With millions of dollars in virtual currency changing hands each month in simulated worlds like EverQuest and Second Life, there are increasing reports of virtual-world moguls amassing real-world riches and scholars warning that these online worlds could be the &#8220;21st century&#8217;s equivalent of hiding funds offshore.&#8221; So it may be only a matter of time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With millions of dollars in virtual currency changing hands each month in simulated worlds like EverQuest and Second Life, there are increasing reports of <a href="http://www.anshechung.com/include/press/press_release251106.html">virtual-world moguls amassing real-world riches</a> and scholars warning that these online worlds could be the &#8220;21st century&#8217;s equivalent of hiding funds offshore.&#8221; So it may be only a matter of time before tax authorities open a virtual office or two. And in the not-too-distant future, they may.</p>
<p>Congress&#8217; Joint Economic Committee is <a href="http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9733848-7.html">expected to issue a report on the potential taxation of virtual goods</a> by the end of July. No word yet on what it might say, although a JEC director has suggested that &#8220;as long as virtual activity stays within the virtual economy, it shouldn&#8217;t be taxable.&#8221; So is that to say that there are tax consequences for activity that extends beyond it? Sounds like it. &#8220;Any time someone wins a tangible prize or award, the value is reportable as taxable income,&#8221; <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/03/02/technology/sl_taxes/index.htm">an Internal Revenue Service rep told CNN</a> earlier this year. &#8220;An accumulation of &#8216;points&#8217; would not result in tax consequences, but redeeming or selling them for money, goods, or services would.&#8221;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070625/death-virtual-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
