<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Daily &#187; extension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/tag/extension/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Blows Book Search Deal Deadline</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091109/google-blows-book-search-deal-deadline/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091109/google-blows-book-search-deal-deadline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors Guild Association of American Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deadline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exclusive rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Books Settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Boni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orphan works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=28552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google’s five-year-old copyright feud with the publishing industry will drag on a few days more now that the deadline for submitting a revised settlement proposal has been pushed back once again. Google and attorneys representing the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers were supposed to file the document today, but instead asked the judge overseeing the matter to give them until the end of the week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/202288021_6648c289de_m-150x150.jpg" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-28556" />Google’s five-year-old copyright feud with the publishing industry will drag on a few days more now that the deadline for submitting a revised settlement proposal has been pushed back once again. Google (GOOG) and attorneys representing the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers were supposed to file the document today, but instead asked the judge overseeing the matter to give them until the end of the week. </p>
<p>&#8220;The parties have been in discussions with the Department of Justice both prior to and since the October 7 status conference,&#8221; <a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6706261.html?desc=topstory">attorney Michael Boni explained in a letter requesting the extension</a>. &#8220;We met with the Department as recently as this past Friday, November 6. In light of the above, the parties respectfully request this additional time to file the motion.&#8221;</p>
<p>It would seem, then, that the latest version of the settlement did not adequately address the DOJ’s concerns that the agreement could violate antitrust law by giving Google &#8220;de facto exclusive rights for the digital distribution of orphan works.&#8221; Presumably if it had, it would have been filed on time.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091109/google-blows-book-search-deal-deadline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows XP: It Lives Again</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090618/windows-xp-it-lives-again/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090618/windows-xp-it-lives-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deadline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redmond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service pack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultimate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=19838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows XP is almost nine years old. And it will be almost 11 before it is finally retired for good now that Microsoft has once again extended XP downgrade rights, this time for 18 months following the general availability of Windows 7.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/06/itlivesagain.png" alt="itlivesagain" title="itlivesagain" width="200" height="323" class="alignright size-full wp-image-19836" />Windows XP is almost nine years old. And it will be almost 11 before it’s finally retired for good, now that <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9134528&amp;source=rss_news">Microsoft has once again extended XP downgrade rights</a>. </p>
<p>Said Microsoft: “Windows 7 Professional and Ultimate customers will have the option to downgrade to Windows XP Professional from PCs that ship within 18 months following the general availability of Windows 7 or until the release of a Windows 7 service pack, whichever is sooner, and if a service pack is developed.&#8221;</p>
<p>This means OEMs could still be selling XP-equipped PCs <em>as late as April 2011</em>. Which is astonishing when you recall that <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081222/xp-extension/">the company originally planned to cut off sales of XP on Jan. 30, 2008</a>, one year after Windows Vista debuted. But the poor reception given Vista and the unwavering loyalty of XP users caused the company to extend that deadline to June 30, 2008. A few months later, Microsoft (MSFT) pushed the deadline out further, to Jan. 31, 2009. Then, amid reports that more than a third of all new Vista PCs were being downgraded to XP, Redmond extended the XP deadline to May 30, 2009. The company subsequently pushed that extension out to April 22, 2010.  </p>
<p>And now we’re into mid-2011.  </p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090618/windows-xp-it-lives-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MobileMea Culpa, Redux</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080819/mobilemea-culpa-redux/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080819/mobilemea-culpa-redux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MobileMe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=3480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If, as Apple CEO Steve Jobs recently said, the launch of MobileMe was not Apple’s finest hour, then what can be said of the more than 800 hours that followed? Because they haven’t exactly been Apple’s finest hours either. So, how about a “60-day extension to MobileMe subscriptions free of charge”?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/07/failme.jpg" alt="" title="failme" width="350" height="298" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2901" /> If, as Apple CEO Steve Jobs recently said, <a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/08/05/steve-jobs-on-mobileme-the-full-e-mail">the launch of MobileMe was not Apple&#8217;s finest hour</a>, then what can be said of the more than <a href="http://www.apple.com/support/mobileme/system_status_history.html">800 hours that followed</a>? Because they <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080729/failme/">haven&#8217;t exactly been Apple&#8217;s finest hours</a> either.</p>
<p>So, how about <a href="http://www.apple.com/mobileme/news/2008/08/60-day-subscription-extension.html">&#8220;here&#8217;s another free extension to your MobileMe subscription&#8211;now let&#8217;s forget this ever happened&#8221;</a>?</p>
<p>In yet another attempt to make amends with dismayed MobileMe subscribers, Apple (AAPL) is granting them a <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2826">free 60-day service extension</a>. And that&#8217;s on top of the <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080716/mobileme/">free 30-day extension</a> it offered in July.</p>
<p>In an e-mail to MobileMe subscribers announcing the extension, a humbled Apple acknowledged that the Web services suite still doesn&#8217;t live up to Apple standards. &#8220;We have already made many improvements to MobileMe, but we still have many more to make,&#8221; the email reads. &#8220;&#8230; We are working very hard to make MobileMe a great service we can all be proud of. We know that MobileMe&#8217;s launch has not been our finest hour, and we truly appreciate your patience as we turn this around.&#8221;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080819/mobilemea-culpa-redux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
