The fight for Skype has ended. After weeks of nasty legal sparring, the Internet telephony service’s founders agreed to join the investor group purchasing it from EBay (EBAY) and dropped the lawsuit that had threatened to bollocks the deal.

“Skype will be well positioned to move forward under new owners with ownership and control over its core technology,” said eBay chief executive John Donahoe in a statement. “We look forward to closing the deal and focusing on growing our core e-commerce and payments businesses.”

Under the terms of the agreement, Skype founders Niklas Zennström and Janus Friis will take a 14 percent stake in the company they founded and then sold to eBay, which will include an investment by them.

BoomTown’s Kara Swisher reported yesterday that the total was 13 percent–10 percent for the rights to key Skype technology held by the founders and the option to invest $83 million for three percent more.

In exchange, the pair will give Skype software essential to its operation and drop their various lawsuits against eBay and Skype buyers.

Interestingly, Index Ventures, which helped orchestrate the deal, is leaving the consortium of investors taking a majority stake in the company–as BoomTown reported earlier this week. Index partner Michelangelo Volpi, a former employee of Skype’s founders, had been at the center of one the suits that threatened to ruin the deal. Said Index partner Danny Rimer: “The deal terms changed for Index such that it no longer matches our investment criteria and thus we have decided not to participate in the transaction.”

PREVIOUSLY:

• Volpi and Index Ventures Out of Skype Deal, the Lawsuit-Happy Founder Twins In
• I Love the Smell of Settlement in the Morning: Skype Founders Set to Get 10 Percent, Option to Buy Three Percent More and Two Board Seats
• Volpi and Index Smack Back at Skype Founders With Motion to Dismiss (Plus Filings!)
• When Entrepreneurs Attack! All 10 New Skype Lawsuit Filings!
• Dueling Skype Sides Hire Big Communications Guns
• Skype Actually a “Voice Over IP Litigation” Service

Notably absent from this update, however, is the reenabling of iTunes synchronization, which Apple (AAPL) spannered when it released iTunes 9.0 earlier this month. Seems that Palm (PALM) was either unable to develop a way to restore this feature or has thought better of doing so after the USB Implementers Forum took issue with the manner in which it was doing it.

According to a new company timeline (see image below; click to enlarge), webOS developers who’ve had their applications accepted for the App Catalog will see them featured there on that day. Apps can be purchased via credit card. App sales will be split 70/30, with 70 percent going to developers and 30 percent going to Palm (PALM).

“The sole driver of the increase in Apple’s price target is a higher valuation of the iPhone,” Wolf wrote. “Courtesy of network effects, the explosive growth of the iTunes App Store…should translate into a higher growth trajectory of iPhone sales going forward….By exploiting a commanding lead in the all-important smartphone applications market, the iPhone is in a position to chalk up share gains in this fast-growing market that could surprise everyone….In many respects, Apple and Amazon are in similar positions. Amazon holds a relatively small but growing share of the e-commerce market, which itself is small, but growing an order of magnitude faster than the physical retail market.”

Wolf admits that his latest forecast is “judgmental” in that it’s based on the premise that software, namely iPhone applications, will drive hardware, namely iPhone sales. But he explains that the premise does have a proven track record in markets characterized by increasing returns and network effects.

“We have upped the number of iPhones that will be sold in 2018, the final year in our model, from 67 million to 107 million,” Wolf added. “Our forecast has the phone capturing 20 percent share of the smartphone market in that year, up from 12.5 percent recently. We should note that the iPhone’s share of the worldwide market is already around 12.5 percent. So our forecast is by no means an aggressive one.”

No doubt about it, it’s a good time to be an Apple investor.

And that’s exactly what consumers are looking for, according to Google (GOOG).

“We’ve seen quite an increase in queries for things like discounts and bargains and things like that,” Google CEO Eric Schmidt told “Meet The Press” this past weekend. “And we know that shoppers are using the Internet to get better pricing.”

According to research outfit comScore, online spending grew by just one percent over October 2007. That was its lowest monthly growth rate since 2001, the year comScore first began tracking it. Worse, it was the sixth consecutive month in which growth declined.

Dismal news for Internet retailers, who now find themselves offering steep discounts to court customers with less discretionary income. Of course, lower price-points mean less profit. But better some profit than none at all. “A lot of these retailers aren’t running on big margins to begin with, so it’s pretty challenging,” Gian Fulgoni, chairman of comScore (SCOR), told the New York Times. “But it’s a Catch-22 situation: They have to run these deals because that’s what consumers are looking for this season.”

Sad to say, but the e-commerce sector’s holidays will be anything but happy ones.

Point taken. Certainly, we’re not going to see the recession inspiring companies to suddenly shutdown their e-commerce operations or disable Salesforce in aid of their longevity. But that doesn’t mean the Grim Reaper of the “Next Economy” isn’t going to sweep this latest crop of Webvans and Scients off into the abyss, and from there into the pages of a 2013 Fast Company article.

That said, take it from Colony: Don’t worry, be happy.

[Image Credit: Sequoia Capital via VentureBeat]

Yet it’s being bandied about by Democratic State Assemblyman Charles Calderon, whose Assembly Bill 1956 would expand the state’s sales tax to digital goods–music downloads, e-books, pornography and what-not. “The notion of taxing tangible, physical property is really an industrial-era construct when we made widgets and sold widgets,” Calderon argues. “Now it’s not about widgets, it’s about information, and selling information and moving information.”

It certainly is, but is it really prudent to slap an iTax of 8.25% to 8.75% on such information? Especially when those who peddle it could pretty easily create a separate entity out-of-state and avoid it altogether? Driving away e-commerce certainly isn’t going to do California’s budget any good. “When you charge these taxes, all these e-commerce [companies] are going to move outside of California,” said Michelle Steel, a member of the California State Board of Equalization. “California is the high-tech state; why would you want to kick them out?”

Good question. Because if you do force them out, who’s going to provide the state with its massive tax windfalls? From an Associated Press report from January, 2007:

After cashing in more than 9 million shares valued at $3.7 billion last year, 16 Google insiders will owe the Golden State as much as $380 million in taxes–enough to cover the salaries of more than 3,000 state workers.”

The company’s stock closed at HK$39.50–155 times next year’s estimated earnings. A jaw-dropping multiple even by the giddy standards of the Hong Kong and Chinese stock markets. Value of Alibaba stood at 161 times earnings, based on its projections for 2008. “The growth today reflected our IPO price wasn’t that expensive,” Alibaba chairman Jack Ma told a press conference in Hong Kong. “We are … leaving money on the table to share with others.”

“Others” like Yahoo, for example, which owns a sizable stake in Alibaba Group, the majority owner of Alibaba.com, and could do quite well for itself a a result. Tech Trader Daily’s Eric Savitz breaks it down: “Alibaba Group holds a 75% stake in Alibaba.com, which is worth $17.4 billion. Yahoo owns 39% of Alibaba Group, which puts the value of their share at $6.8 billion. The direct-owned 1.2% stake is worth about $278 million. That puts the total value of Yahoo’s interest in Alibaba.com at north of $7 billion. That’s about 16.7% of Yahoo’s current $42 billion valuation.”

Great news for Yahoo, eh? Now CEO Jerry Yang has something happy to think about while he sits in the Congressional hotseat today answering questions about the company’s role in helping Chinese officials put a journalist accused of leaking state secrets in prison for 10 years …