<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Daily &#187; capitalization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/tag/capitalization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Alcatel-Lucent: Let's Get Small</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081212/alcatel-lucent-lets-get-small/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081212/alcatel-lucent-lets-get-small/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcatel-Lucent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Verwaayen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profitability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=9547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alcatel-Lucent, the world’s largest maker of telecommunications equipment, won’t be quite so large come 2009. This morning the struggling Franco-American network supplier said it plans to sack 1,000 managers and 5,000 contractors in a bid to bring down costs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/12/d52121i92lc.jpg" alt="" title="d52121i92lc" width="200" height="200" class="alignright size-full wp-image-9548" />Alcatel-Lucent, the world&#8217;s largest maker of telecommunications equipment, won&#8217;t be quite so large come 2009. This morning the struggling Franco-American network supplier said it plans to<a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/alcatel-lucent-cut-1000-jobs-strategic/story.aspx?guid=%7B34D52BA6-4FC5-4331-B745-A96A43B28610%7D&amp;dist=msr_8"> sack 1,000 managers and 5,000 contractors</a> in a bid to bring down costs. &#8220;The new management team is committed to rapidly executing this new strategy and leveraging the new streamlined organization,&#8221; CEO Ben Verwaayen said in a statement. We are focused on delivering results and restoring profitability.&#8221;</p>
<p>This latest swing of the ax brings total job cuts at Alcatel-Lucent (ALU) to about 22,500 since the 2006 merger that created it. And though the company will be leaner and meaner for it, that new found agility won&#8217;t count for much without a shift in business strategy bold enough to reverse the brutal reduction in market share and market capitalization Alcatel-Lucent has suffered. And an oblique and, frankly, baffling mention of Web 2.0, does not a business strategy make.</p>
<p>Alcatel-Lucent&#8217;s plan is to &#8220;combine the trusted capabilities of the network environment with the creative communications services of the Web (Web 2.0, Web 3.0 and beyond).&#8221; <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=11208">What the hell does that mean?</a></p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081212/alcatel-lucent-lets-get-small/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google, Salesforce.com Expand Strategic Lovefest</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080414/ddv20080414/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080414/ddv20080414/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blockbuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circuit City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Docs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Benioff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negotiations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salesforce.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080414/ddv20080414/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="video-wsj"><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={1504332444}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="320" height="240" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080414/ddv20080414/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CircuitBuster Would Merge Failure With Fiasco</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080414/circuitbuster/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080414/circuitbuster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blockbuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circuit City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due diligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kiosk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080414/circuitbuster/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. Blockbuster is completely out of ideas, isn&#8217;t it? This morning the foundering movie rental chain went public with its bid to acquire ailing retail consumer-electronics chain Circuit City.
In a Feb. 17 letter to Circuit City CEO Philip Schoonover, Blockbuster (BBI) offered to pay more than $1 billion for the chain. But, to date, Circuit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Blockbuster is <em>completely</em> out of ideas, isn&#8217;t it? This morning the foundering movie rental chain <a href="http://www.b2i.us/profiles/investor/ResLibraryView.asp?BzID=553&amp;ResLibraryID=24044&amp;Category=1195">went public</a> with its bid to acquire ailing retail consumer-electronics chain Circuit City.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120815486252112311.html?mod=Media-Marketing">a Feb. 17 letter to Circuit City CEO Philip Schoonover</a>, Blockbuster (BBI) offered to pay more than $1 billion for the chain. But, to date, Circuit City (CC) hasn&#8217;t fulfilled a request for due diligence necessary to make the bid definitive.</p>
<p>Why? In a conference call today, Blockbuster chief exec Jim Keyes described the offer as &#8220;simply too attractive to ignore.&#8221; But it seems Circuit City also thinks the offer might be too attractive for Blockbuster to finance. &#8220;&#8230; To date Blockbuster has been unable to satisfy Circuit City and its advisers that Blockbuster&#8217;s proposal could be financed,&#8221; <a href="http://newsroom.circuitcity.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=304396">the electronics retailer said in a statement</a>. &#8220;In particular, Blockbuster&#8217;s proposal appears to contemplate a rights offering of unprecedented size relative to the issuing company&#8217;s market capitalization and at a price that is at a significant premium to Blockbuster&#8217;s current market price.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, yes, there is that. And, of course, <a href="http://blogs.marketwatch.com/greenberg/2008/04/whats-blockbuster-thinking/?mod=MWBlog">there are other issues as well</a>. Like what, exactly, are the synergies between a foundering movie rental chain and a foundering electronics retailer&#8211;aside from the fact that they&#8217;re both, you know, foundering? If it&#8217;s Blockbuster rental kiosks in Circuit City stores, the alliance would seem doomed to failure. Wait. <em><a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-blockbuster-pushes-acquisition-of-circuit-city/">It is Blockbuster rental kiosks in Circuit City stores</a></em>? </p>
<p>To be fair, Keyes says digital content is important too, and he seems convinced that Circuit City will provide Blockbuster with the infrastructure it needs to distribute video to TVs and mobile devices. &#8220;What this combination provides is the ultimate distribution channel for [digital] content,&#8221; he said this morning. &#8220;It&#8217;s not necessarily downloading content to the PC that will ultimately capture the consumer&#8217;s imagination. It&#8217;s the opportunity to get that content on your TV and your mobile device that is a game-changing opportunity.&#8221;</p>
<p>A game-changing opportunity for Apple (AAPL), maybe. But for a foundering, outdated video-rental outfit?</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080414/circuitbuster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
