<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Daily &#187; Ask</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/tag/ask/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ask: The Little Search Engine That Couldn't</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081006/ask-the-little-search-engine-that-couldnt/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081006/ask-the-little-search-engine-that-couldnt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Diller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interactive Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structured data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=6232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a 4.8 percent share of the search market, according to comScore, Ask has long been the inveterate fourth-place contestant in a sector overwhelmingly dominated by Google. And try as it might--with both redesigns and ad campaigns--the company just can’t seem to build any audience beyond that. So there’s little reason to believe that Ask’s latest redesign--its third in as many years and the 11th since it first launched--won’t be as ineffective as those that have gone before it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/10/train.jpg" alt="" title="train" width="200" height="177" class="alignright size-full wp-image-6238" />With a 4.8 percent share of the search market, according to comScore, Ask has long been the inveterate fourth-place contestant in a sector overwhelmingly dominated by Google (GOOG). And try as it might&#8211;with both redesigns and ad campaigns&#8211;<a href="http://technologizer.com/2008/10/06/the-new-askcom-a-little-less-distinctive/">the company just can&#8217;t seem to build any audience beyond that</a>. So there&#8217;s little reason to believe that Ask&#8217;s latest redesign&#8211;its third in as many years and <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10058007-2.html">the 11th since it first launched</a>&#8211;won&#8217;t be as ineffective as those that have gone before it. </p>
<p>The new Ask is faster than its predecessor. Its search results are more relevant and sharpened by structured data (TV listings, etc.) where available. And the little search engine that couldn&#8217;t is still using semantic technology to interpret and answer questions put to it by users. &#8220;To call it an all-new Ask is wrong; it&#8217;s an evolution of Ask,&#8221; <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122325792476606703.html">said Barry Diller, CEO of Ask parent IAC/InterActiveCorp</a> (IACI). &#8220;I think it&#8217;s going to help us primarily in [visitor] retention and frequency. That is really its goal.&#8221;</p>
<p>But while it might appeal to some, Ask&#8217;s latest iteration isn&#8217;t likely to make much of a difference in the brutish battle for search engine market share. But then Ask doesn&#8217;t need much, does it? The search business is enormously profitable. As <a href="http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2007/05/why_1_of_search.html">Microsoft&#8217;s (MSFT) Don Dodge once noted</a>, every market-share point in search is worth a billion dollars or more. So if Ask manages to boost its share of all searches even slightly, it&#8217;s a success. &#8220;Search revenue for us is very profitable and it&#8217;s certainly growing,&#8221; said Diller. &#8220;Does it matter whether or not we take big chunks of&#8230;market share? No. Would we like and hope to? Yes.&#8221;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081006/ask-the-little-search-engine-that-couldnt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google's Mission: To Organize the World's Search Market and Make It Naturally Monopolizable</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080812/goog-market/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080812/goog-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Suisse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heath Terry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet search market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordan Rohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBC Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=3125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“We see little to stop Google from reaching 70 percent market share eventually; the question, really, comes down to, ‘How long could it take?’” RBC Capital Markets analyst Jordan Rohan asked that question back in March 2006. Today he has his answer: Not long at all, really.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/02/google_hog.jpg' class='centered' style="border: 1px solid #000;" alt='google_hog.jpg' /><br />
&#8220;We see little to stop Google from reaching 70 percent market share eventually; the question, really, comes down to, &#8216;How long could it take?&#8217;&#8221;  <a href="http://www.news.com/Googles-market-lead-widens/2100-1030_3-6054990.html">RBC Capital Markets analyst Jordan Rohan asked that question back in March 2006.</a> Today he has his answer:  Not long at all, really.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-dougherty/2008/08/googles_share_of_us_searches_h.html">new metrics from Hitwise</a>, Google&#8217;s (GOOG) share of the U.S. Internet search market grew to 70.77 percent in July. That&#8217;s a 10 percent increase over the same month last year. The search juggernaut&#8217;s growth came once again at the expense of rivals Yahoo (YHOO), Microsoft (MSFT) and Ask. The market share of all three declined in the same period&#8211;Yahoo&#8217;s to 18.65 percent, Microsoft&#8217;s to 5.36 percent, and Ask&#8217;s to 3.53 percent.</p>
<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/08/hitwise.jpg" alt="" title="hitwise" width="350" height="120" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3126" /></p>
<p>Seems that search really is a natural monopoly business, as Credit Suisse analyst Heath Terry once noted. &#8220;We believe that search is a natural monopoly business and expect that over time Google will continue to gain share until they have effectively reached 100 percent,&#8221; Heath wrote in a research note to clients last year. &#8220;Over the last two years Google has gained 50 [basis points] of share/month in the U.S. and 60bp globally. We expect these share gains to accelerate as declining scale makes it more difficult for competitors to justify the technology investments needed to maintain search result quality.&#8221; </p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the case, if search is a natural monopoly business, then Google is apparently its natural monopolist. After all, a 70 percent share of the search market is &#8230; well, it&#8217;s obscene, really. And it begs many a question about the company&#8217;s partnership with Yahoo and the potential antitrust problems it may present. No wonder <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1011006/000089161808000399/f42710exv10w19.htm">the document</a> outlining the terms of two companies&#8217; search advertising deal is <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080808/the-yahoo-google-agreement-filed-and-mightily-redacted/">so heavily redacted</a> &#8230;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080812/goog-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
