<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Daily &#187; Article 29 Working Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/tag/article-29-working-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:03:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Safari for Windows: Like a Glass of Ice Water in Hell</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070612/ddv20070612/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070612/ddv20070612/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 29 Working Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAN-SPAM Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldwide Developers Conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070612/ddv20070612/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="video-wsj"><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={992146966}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="320" height="240" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070612/ddv20070612/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Data Protection Officials: Yahoo and Microsoft Have Search Engines?</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070612/google-eu-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070612/google-eu-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 29 Working Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070612/google-eu-privacy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s be honest here: &#8220;Don&#8217;t Be Evil,&#8221; Google&#8217;s Hippocratic oath for corporations, was a masterful public-relations gesture when it was first made, but it never changed the increasing risks associated with the company&#8217;s business operations. Google is a public company, not a public interest. There&#8217;s really no reason to trust it to do the right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s be honest here: &#8220;Don&#8217;t Be Evil,&#8221; Google&#8217;s Hippocratic oath for corporations, was a masterful public-relations gesture when it was first made, but it never changed the increasing risks associated with the company&#8217;s business operations. Google is a public company, not a public interest. There&#8217;s really no reason to trust it to do the right thing with your private data.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s reassuring to learn that <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19185549/">the company has agreed to cut the time</a> for which it retains users&#8217; personal search data to 18 months from 18 to 24 months. The move is a concession to the Article 29 Working Party, the European Commission’s advisory group on privacy protection, which <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6692063.stm">last month expressed concern over Google&#8217;s plan to retain user data for up to two years</a> (<a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/news/docs/pr_google_16_05_07_en.pdf">PDF</a>). &#8220;After considering the Working Party&#8217;s concerns, we are announcing a new policy: to  anonymize our search server logs after 18 months, rather than the previously established  period of 18 to 24 months,&#8221;  <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/06/how-long-should-google-remember.html">Peter Fleischer, Google&#8217;s global privacy counsel explained</a>. &#8220;We believe that we can still address our legitimate interests in security, innovation and antifraud efforts with this shorter period. However, we must  point out that future data-retention laws may obligate us to raise the retention period to 24 months. We also firmly reject any suggestions that we could meet our legitimate interests in security, innovation and antifraud efforts with any retention period shorter than 18 months.&#8221;</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s policy change, while certainly a step in the right direction, likely won&#8217;t be enough to sate privacy advocates who&#8217;ve in the past called for it to scrub user logs in 18 to 24 hours, not months. Still, <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1038_3-6167333.html">it&#8217;s better than that of Yahoo and Microsoft</a>, which have so far declined to disclose their data-retention policies at all. This begs the question: <a href="http://searchengineland.com/070612-041042.php">Why haven&#8217;t we heard anything about the Working Party&#8217;s letters to those two companies?</a>  Insufficient postage for airmail?</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070612/google-eu-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
