<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Daily &#187; AppleInsider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/tag/apple-insider/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Apple FCC Docs Hint at iMac Refresh</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091002/apple-fcc-docs-hint-at-imac-refresh/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091002/apple-fcc-docs-hint-at-imac-refresh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppleInsider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual-cre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mighty Mouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rollerball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s looking more and more likely that Apple is planning a fall refresh of its iMac line. Last week we heard rumors that some new all-in-one, dual-core desktops were already rolling off the assembly lines of Apple’s manufacturing partners. Now comes word of Federal Communications Commission filings that confirm the existence of the new wireless mouse and keyboard that might be paired with them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.macblogz.com/2008/12/19/one-more-thing-apples-new-multi-touch-mighty-mouse/"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/10/mightiermouse.jpg" alt="mightiermouse" title="mightiermouse" width="200" height="200" class="alignright size-full wp-image-25873" /></a>It’s looking more and more likely that Apple is planning a fall refresh of its iMac line. Last week, we heard rumors that some <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/new-imacs-may-include-%E2%80%9Cbag-of-hurt%E2%80%9D-option/">new all-in-one, dual-core desktops</a> were already rolling off the assembly lines of Apple’s manufacturing partners. Now <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/new-apple-bluetooth-keyboard-arrives-at-the-fcc-new-mouse-rumor/"> Engadget has spotted Federal Communications Commission filings</a> that confirm the existence of the new <a href="https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;application_id=519328&amp;fcc_id=%27BCGA1296">wireless mouse</a> and <a href="https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&amp;RequestTimeout=500&amp;calledFromFrame=N&amp;application_id=462431&amp;fcc_id=%27BCGA1314">keyboard</a> that might be paired with them. </p>
<p>Neither filing provides much detail about either device beyond model number, though the keyboard described in one does appear to be smaller than the current model. That said, AppleInsider speculates that the mouse Apple (AAPL) is evidently working on will be <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/02/apple_plans_mighty_mouse_makeover.html">significantly mightier than the current Mighty Mouse</a>, scrapping the device’s rollerball in favor of a touch-sensitive housing and perhaps even an aluminum finish.<br />
<a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/10/fcc-091002-1.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/10/fcc-091002-1-250x109.jpg" alt="fcc-091002-1" title="fcc-091002-1" width="250" height="109" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-25866" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/10/fcc-091002-2.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/10/fcc-091002-2-216x300.jpg" alt="fcc-091002-2" title="fcc-091002-2" width="216" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-25867" /></a></p>
<p>[I<em>Image Credits: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/new-apple-bluetooth-keyboard-arrives-at-the-fcc-new-mouse-rumor/">Engadget</a> and <a href="http://www.macblogz.com/2008/12/19/one-more-thing-apples-new-multi-touch-mighty-mouse/">MacBlogz</a></em>]</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091002/apple-fcc-docs-hint-at-imac-refresh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New iMacs May Include "Bag of Hurt" Option</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/new-imacs-may-include-%e2%80%9cbag-of-hurt%e2%80%9d-option/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/new-imacs-may-include-%e2%80%9cbag-of-hurt%e2%80%9d-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppleInsider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bag of hurt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual-core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacRumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacRumors Buyer's Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refresh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asked in October 2008 why Apple wasn’t yet offering Blu-ray DVD drives as an option on machines, Apple CEO Steve Jobs said the licensing issues were too complex to make doing so worthwhile. "Blu-ray is a bag of hurt," he quipped. Well, no longer. Because Apple is planning to refresh its iMac desktop computer in the next few weeks, and when it does, it may well offer a Blue-ray drive option.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/augurs-150x150.jpg" alt="augurs-150x150" title="augurs-150x150" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-25516" />Asked in October 2008 why Apple wasn’t yet offering Blu-ray DVD drives as an option on machines, Apple CEO Steve Jobs said the licensing issues were too complex to make doing so worthwhile. &#8220;Blu-ray is a bag of hurt,&#8221; <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081014/qotd-48/">he quipped</a>.</p>
<p>Well, no longer. Because Apple (AAPL) is planning to refresh its iMac desktop computer in the next few weeks, and when it does, it may well offer a Blue-ray drive option. </p>
<p>Sources tell AppleInsider that the new all-in-one, dual-core desktops, which are also said to feature a new, slimmer enclosure, were finalized earlier this month and are already rolling off the assembly lines of Apple’s manufacturing partners. </p>
<p>&#8220;The late 2009 iMac line should also debut several features previously unavailable to Mac buyers,&#8221; the publication notes. &#8220;People familiar with Apple&#8217;s thinking have suggested in recent months one of these moves could see the company finally embrace Blu-ray.&#8221;</p>
<p>One last point worth noting here: According to the MacRumors Buyer&#8217;s Guide, <a href="http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#iMac">the iMac is due for a refresh</a>. Apple has updated it every 220 days on average since it debuted the machine in 2003. As of  today, it has been 204 days since the last update. MacRumors’s recommendation: &#8220;Buy only if you need it&#8211;Approaching the end of a cycle.&#8221;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/new-imacs-may-include-%e2%80%9cbag-of-hurt%e2%80%9d-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Belkin's Not Exhibiting at Macworld, Who Is?</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081205/belkin-no-booth-at-macworld/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081205/belkin-no-booth-at-macworld/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppleInsider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attendees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[booth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exhibitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday promotions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotel suites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incremental value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell-thru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=9200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Next month’s Macworld Conference &#38; Expo show floor will be quite a bit easier to navigate than in years past. With registration down by 20 percent over last year, there are likely to be far fewer attendees, and with a growing list of companies pulling out of the show, there’ll be fewer booths for them to crowd. Earlier this week, Adobe said it had decided against exhibiting on the show floor. A coterie of other companies is joining it, top among them, Belkin, which has also pulled out of exhibiting at CES. What's next--a Super Bowl boycott?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/12/belkinmacworld.jpg" alt="" title="belkinmacworld" width="350" height="251" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9218" />Next month&#8217;s Macworld Conference &#038; Expo show floor will be quite a bit easier to navigate than in years past. With registration down by 20 percent over last year, there are likely to be far fewer attendees at the annual marquee Apple (AAPL) event, and with a growing list of companies pulling out of the show, there&#8217;ll be fewer booths for them to crowd. Earlier this week, Adobe (ADBE) said <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/137244/2008/12/adobeexpo.html">it had decided against exhibiting on the show floor</a>. And now <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/12/04/more_big_names_downsizing_pulling_out_of_macworld_expo.html">a coterie of other companies is joining it</a>, top among them, Belkin, long one of Macworld&#8217;s largest exhibitors.</p>
<p>Belkin has confirmed that it&#8217;s pulling its booth from the show floor as well. The company has opted instead to hold private meetings with its channel partners. It insists that this isn&#8217;t so much a financial decision, as a strategic one&#8211;&#8221;we&#8217;re reallocating show floor funds to hold private product meetings,&#8221; a spokesperson told me&#8211;but it&#8217;s hard not to view it that way, given the continued deterioration of the economy. Interesting to note, though, that sources tell AppleInsider that the company had already paid for its 2009 booth space.</p>
<p>Show organizer IDG must be offering Econalypse refunds&#8230;.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Belkin won&#8217;t be exhibiting at the Consumer Electronics Show, either. &#8220;No booth at CES&#8211;and it&#8217;s for the same reasons why we&#8217;re not exhibiting at MacWorld,&#8221; a spokesperson tells me. &#8220;We learned that a smaller group of our channel partners will be attending CES, and those who are attending are focusing on driving incremental value in 2009. We believe that private meetings in hotel suites are more conducive for this type of discussion, as they are more intimate. So, we are redistributing our resources and funds to help support sell-thru for our retail partners and drive traffic into their stores. Examples: more holiday promotions and programs.&#8221;</p>
<p>As of this morning, no participants&#8211;potential or otherwise&#8211;have pulled out of Super Bowl XLIII, but the trend is looking grim for seasonal blockbusters. We&#8217;ll keep you posted.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081205/belkin-no-booth-at-macworld/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D'Oh, Canada [Updated]</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080708/apple-to-rogers-take-off-eh-hoser/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080708/apple-to-rogers-take-off-eh-hoser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppleInsider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rogers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=2706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you’re a Canadian who doesn’t like the price at which Canada’s exclusive iPhone carrier, Rogers, is selling the device, don’t buy one, the Vancouver Sun advised in an editorial last Friday. Wise advice. And easier to follow, now that Apple is reportedly sanctioning Rogers out of disgust for its exorbitantly priced data rates.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/07/bobanddoug.jpg" alt="" title="bobanddoug" width="350" height="271" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2707" /></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> New reports are emerging that claim <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/07/08/want-to-buy-an-iphone-in-canada-dont-go-to-an-apple-store/">Apple isn&#8217;t selling the iPhone at any of its retail stores outside the U.S come Friday</a>. This would suggest that, while Apple may well be appalled by Rogers&#8217; pricing, it isn&#8217;t protesting it by refusing to sell the iPhone 3G through its own retail stores in Canada.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a Canadian who <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080627.wgtrogersprice0627/CommentStory/Technology/">doesn&#8217;t like</a> the <a href="http://www.ruinediphone.com/">price</a> at which Canada&#8217;s exclusive iPhone carrier, Rogers (RCI), is selling the device <a href="http://canadians.com/read/419-make_the_difference_cancel_your_rogers_account-1.html">don&#8217;t buy one</a>, <a href="http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/editorial/story.html?id=0def1ab0-a015-4125-8015-b57b21c1c823">the Vancouver Sun advised</a> in an editorial last Friday. Wise advice. And easier to follow, now that Apple (AAPL) is reportedly sanctioning Rogers out of disgust for its <a href="http://getthefactsonrogersiphone.com/facts.html">exorbitantly priced data rates</a> (see chart below).  Appalled by Rogers&#8217; pricing, <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/07/08/spat_with_rogers_leaves_canadian_apple_stores_without_iphones.html">Cupertino is said to be refusing to sell the iPhone 3G through its own retail stores in Canada</a>. So come Friday, Canadians looking for a new iPhone will have to head over to a Rogers Wireless outlet to buy one&#8211;assuming they can stomach a three-year contract that requires a minimum monthly payment of $60 for just 150 minutes, 75 text messages, and 400MB of data &#8230; Apple stores will have demo models only.</p>
<table width="350">
<thead>
<tr>
<td style='border:solid black 1.0pt;border-bottom:none black 1.0pt'>
				   &nbsp;
			   </td>
<td colspan='3' style='border:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:none;background:#B0B3B2'>
				   International Cost Comparisons<sup>1</sup>
			   </td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tr>
<td>
				  &nbsp;
			  </td>
<td style='background:#E6E6E6'>
				  Canada (Rogers)<sup>2</sup>
			  </td>
<td style='background:#E6E6E6'>
				  United Kingdom (O2)<sup>3</sup>
			  </td>
<td style='background:#E6E6E6'>
				  United States (AT&amp;T)<sup>4</sup>
			  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class='rowheading'>
				  <strong>Phone cost (8 GB model)</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  $ 199
			  </td>
<td>
				  free
			  </td>
<td>
				  $ 202.03
			  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class='rowheading'>
			  	<strong>Plan cost per month</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  $ 100
			  </td>
<td>
				  $ 76.63
			  </td>
<td>
				  $ 101.51
			  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class='rowheading'>
				  <strong>Minimum contract length</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  <strong>3 years</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  1.5 years
			  </td>
<td>
				  2 years
			  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class='rowheading'>
				  <strong>Voice minutes (day)</strong>
				</td>
<td>
				  <strong>600</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
			  	1200
			  </td>
<td>
				Unlimited
			  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class='rowheading'>
				  <strong>Voice minutes (evenings/weekend)</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  Unlimited
			  </td>
<td>
				  N / A
			  </td>
<td>
				  Unlimited
			  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class='rowheading'>
			  	<strong>Data</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  <strong>1 GB</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  Unlimited
			  </td>
<td>
				  Unlimited
			  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class='rowheading'>
				  <strong>Text messages</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  <strong>300</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  500
			  </td>
<td>
				  0
			  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class='rowheading'>
				  <strong>Call display included</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  <strong>No</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  Yes
			  </td>
<td>
				  Yes
			  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class='rowheading'>
				  <strong>Mandatory extra fees per month</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  $ 7.45
			  </td>
<td>
				  $ 0
			  </td>
<td>
				  $ 1.25
			  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class='rowheading'>
				  <strong>Caller display fee</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  $ 7
			  </td>
<td>
				  $ 0
			  </td>
<td>
				  $ 0
			  </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class='rowheading'>
			  	<strong>Total monthly cost</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  $ 114.45
			  </td>
<td>
				  $ 76.63
			  </td>
<td>
				  $ 102.76
			  </td>
</tr>
<tr style='background:#CCCCCC'>
<td>
				  <strong>YOUR TOTAL COST COMMITMENT:</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  <strong>$ 4319.20</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  <strong>$ 1379.34</strong>
			  </td>
<td>
				  <strong>$ 2668.27</strong>
			  </td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080708/apple-to-rogers-take-off-eh-hoser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple TVo?</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080313/appltvo/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080313/appltvo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple TVo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppleInsider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PVR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TiVo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080313/appltvo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lest there be any doubt that DVR functionality was purposefully left out of Apple TV, consider this patent recently unearthed by AppleInsider. Filed in October of 2006, the patent describes not just a version of Apple TV capable of browsing and recording live TV programming, but a touch-based remote that could be preloaded with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/03/appletvdvr.jpg' class='centered' style="border: 1px solid #000;" alt='appletvdvr.jpg' /></p>
<p>Lest there be any doubt that DVR functionality was purposefully left out of Apple TV, consider this patent recently unearthed by AppleInsider. Filed in October of 2006, the patent describes not just a version of Apple TV <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/03/13/apple_tv_dvr_interface_revealed_in_patent_filings.html">capable of browsing and recording live TV programming</a>, but a touch-based remote that could be preloaded with upcoming TV listings to facilitate it. From the patent:</p>
<blockquote><p>
For example, program data for upcoming programs, e.g., for the next month, can be downloaded and stored on the remote control device. Thereafter, a user of the remote control device can search programs that are to be broadcast and determine which programs to record. The recording settings can be programmed onto the remote control device, and then be provided to the video device when a data communication is established between the remote control device and the video device.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Pretty slick, eh? Lots of additional possibilities here as well. One could easily imagine the iPod Touch and iPhone serving as the remote the patent describes. And if this next-generation Apple TV is capable of recording TV programming, why not make it the gateway through which such programming is delivered? How nice would it be to subscribe to HBO&#8211;and HBO alone&#8211;via iTunes? How nice would it be to subscribe to a season of &#8220;Weeds&#8221;? Or to a commercial-free season of &#8220;The Office&#8221; and skip everything else NBC has to offer? How nice would it be if the latest unwatched episode of &#8220;Weeds&#8221; on your Apple TV was automatically synced to your iPhone for later viewing? How nice would it be if new films opened on iTunes the same day they opened in theaters?</p>
<p>Pipe dream? Perhaps. Certainly, these scenarios would require Apple (AAPL) to ink some fantastical new licensing deals with Hollywood. And the two aren&#8217;t exactly seeing eye-to-eye all the time these days. Still, you never know. <a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3i174d24f4a4bd6a9273308815a9663bfc">Stranger things have happened</a>. </p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080313/appltvo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Look, Guys! A Christmas Card From Apple Legal!</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071221/isilverthorne/</link>
		<comments>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071221/isilverthorne/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppleInsider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menlow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silverthorne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Think Secret]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071221/isilverthorne/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, Apple Insider isn&#8217;t paying much mind to the sudden closure of its Mac rumor site brethren earlier this week. Citing the same sort of &#8220;people familiar with the matter&#8221; that got Think Secret into trouble, the site today reports that Apple plans to adopt Intel&#8217;s upcoming ultra-mobile Silverthorne chip in &#8220;not one but multiple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2007/12/mcbknano.jpg' class='centered' style="border: 1px solid #000;" alt='mcbknano.jpg' />Well, Apple Insider isn&#8217;t paying much mind to <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071220/apple-thinksecret/">the sudden closure of its Mac rumor site brethren</a> earlier this week. Citing the same sort of &#8220;people familiar with the matter&#8221; that got Think Secret into trouble, the site today reports that Apple plans to adopt <a href="http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=8959">Intel&#8217;s upcoming ultra-mobile Silverthorne chip</a> in <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/12/21/exclusive_apple_to_adopt_intels_ultra_mobile_pc_platform.html">&#8220;not one but multiple products</a> currently situated on its 2008 calendar year product roadmap.&#8221;</p>
<p>Silverthorne, part of Intel&#8217;s &#8220;Menlow&#8221; Mobile Internet Device platform, reportedly runs as fast as a second generation Pentium M processor, but consumes between half a watt and two watts of electrical power&#8211;about a tenth of the power consumed by a typical notebook processor. No wonder Apple&#8217;s said to be interested in the chip. It would appear to be perfect for a number of devices rumored to be secreted away in its product pipeline&#8211;<a href="http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/21/the-odds-on-an-apple-flash-mac">the FlashBook,</a> the <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070926/new-newton/">multitouch Newton</a>, the <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070710/apple-megaplatform/">Mac tablet.</a></p>
<p>That said, we&#8217;ll likely not see it popping up in a 3G iPhone, though at first glance it would make sense there as well. &#8220;According to several iPhone teardowns, Apple is likely using the Samsung S3C6400, or some special equivalent built just for them, in the iPhone,&#8221; <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13579_3-9837241-37.html?tag=newsmap">explains News.com&#8217;s Tom Krazit</a>. &#8220;That chip is based on the ARM1176 core, which at 620MHz consumes just 279 milliwatts. That&#8217;s running all-out, whereas most of the time you&#8217;re actually going to be drawing much less power than that. Silverthorne, by contrast, will consume 500 milliwatts of power at minimum, and probably only when it&#8217;s doing nothing in idle mode. Those numbers just aren&#8217;t going to work in a phone, especially an Apple phone, if the company really is so concerned about power consumption that it has held off on releasing a 3G iPhone until the power consumption of that modem improves.&#8221;</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071221/isilverthorne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
