Friday, March 28, 2008
P2P Tax to Be Followed by Boston P2P Party?
Advertisement
brought to you by The Wall Street Journal
Oracle’s Larry Ellison was given a bit of a respite from the financial beating he’s taken over the past few days by the empathic folks at the San Mateo (Calif.) County assessor’s office. The Oracle (ORCL) chairman, worth $25 billion according to Forbes, recently had the value of “Sanbashi,” his grandiose 23-acre Imperial Palace in Woodside, Calif., reassessed from $173 million to about $70 million.
Why the sudden decline in value? Well, like all 16th-century Shogun estates with authentic Japanese teahouses and strolling gardens it suffers from–in the words of Ellison’s appeal–”significant functional obsolescence.” And that obsolescence is so significant that it entitles the world’s 14th wealthiest man to a $3 million tax refund.
Sadly for San Mateo County, that refund will be paid from property taxes that otherwise would have gone to schools, among other things. And what will Ellison do with the money? Who knows. Perhaps he’ll spend it on another 30-ton “shower rock” like the one in Sanbashi, which he reportedly “auditioned” by pretending to shower in front of it.

Oracle CEO Larry Ellison is a little lighter in the wallet today–about $2 billion lighter–thanks to a third quarter sales miss that sent the company’s shares down some 8% in after-hours trading.
Oracle (ORCL) posted a 30% increase in profits and a 21% increase in revenue, both in line with expectations. But a 16% rise in sales of new software that came in on the low end of its January forecast spooked investors who believed Oracle to be immune to the economic slowdown.
“A lot of investors had bought the stock in anticipation of a strong quarter,” said Avian Securities analyst Jeff Gaggin. “The applications business was definitely disappointing.”
According to last year’s safely-looking-ahead-to-the-year-to-come lists, 2007 was to be “a year of hyperdisruption for the technology industry”; it was to be “a year of significant developments” and “a year of evolution”; it was to be “a year of invention and innovation,” “a year of experimentation” and “a year of slow, but significant, change”; it was to be “a year of carnage,” but it was also to be “a year of great happiness and multiple blessings.” Above all, 2007 was to be “a busy year for technology.”
Which, as you’ll see below (and in our companion video), is pretty much how it turned out. What follows is Digital Daily’s abridged guide to the year in tech news–a fond reminiscence of what was, and our First Annual Year-End List For Year-End List Haters.
Oracle CEO Larry Ellison’s had a hell of a week, hasn’t he? Yesterday, Oracle shrugged off concerns about a tech slowdown, besting Wall Street’s expectations with a 35% gain in its second-quarter earnings. And then today, shares of NetSuite, the “software as a service” venture of which he is a principal owner, priced at $26 a share in their IPO debut, well above the expected per-share price range of $19 to $22, which itself was $6 higher than $13 price initially set by underwriters.
NetSuite sold about 6.2 million shares in its modified Dutch auction IPO, raising$161.2 million. That makes the company worth more than $1.5 billion and the stake of its mercurial investor–who’s already No. 11 on Forbes list of billionaires–worth about $1 billion.
Larry Ellison’s other company is finally going public. Today, NetSuite–the software-as-a-service company of which Ellison is a majority owner–opened bidding on the 6.2 million common shares it plans to sell in a modified Dutch auction.
Assuming the IPO goes off as planned–and given the healthy market for tech IPOs, there’s every reason to believe it will–NetSuite shares will price out in the range of $13 to $16, raising the company some $99 million with which to pay off some debt, make new investments and further enrich Ellison, who controls about 60% of NetSuite’s outstanding stock.
To be fair, though, he does plan to set aside some 31.9 million shares for charitable purposes–perhaps another $115 million pledge to make and then withdraw from Harvard University?

Turns out William Klein, BEA Systems’ vice-president of business planning and development, was sorely mistaken when he said “BEA is worth substantially more to Oracle, to others and, importantly, to our shareholders than the price” Oracle offered for it. Certainly, that’s the opinion of Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, who says any future Oracle takeover bid for BEA Systems–if there ever is one–will be for less than the $7 billion it offered last month.
“If we made another offer [for BEA], the price would be lower,” Ellison said at Oracle’s annual analyst meeting yesterday. “Clearly the $17 price seems too high today. It seems unlikely anyone will want to buy them now. … If their goal was to stay independent, I think they’re doing a good job.”
That said, Oracle’s BEA experience hasn’t exactly put Ellison off his feed. “We are now looking at our second favorite stocks and we have found some attractive” ones, he said.
Microsoft chairman Bill Gates, not Apple co-founder and CEO Steve Jobs, is the most influential IT personality of the past quarter-century.
This according to a survey of IT professionals conducted by the Computing Technology Industry Association. Asked to list the most influential tech personalities of the last 25 years, 84% of respondents listed Gates, and 73% listed Jobs. Also appearing on the list: Dell CEO Michael Dell (53% of respondents); Linux founder Linus Torvalds (47%); Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page (also 47%); Cisco CEO John Chambers (44%); Oracle CEO Larry Ellison (36%); Vint “Father of the Internet” Cerf (35%); Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer (also 35%); and eBay CEO Meg Whitman (30%).
BEA Systems made good on its promise to allow the deadline to lapse on Oracle’s $17-per-share offer to buy the company. And Oracle made good on its threat to drop the bid. Minutes after 5 p.m. PDT yesterday, the deadline set by Oracle for BEA to agree to its offer, the company issued a terse, disdainful statement announcing its expiration.
“Over time many things can change: BEA’s business might materially weaken, the stock market can fall further from its recent record highs, or Oracle may have committed its capital elsewhere. Over the last 20 days, the BEA Board has repeatedly rejected our offer and refused to meet with us, even though we offered to meet without any preconditions. We asked the BEA Board to allow their shareholders to vote on our $17-per-share proposal. They chose not to. If the BEA shareholders are unhappy with the behavior of the BEA Board, it is up to those shareholders, not Oracle, to take the appropriate action.”
And by “BEA shareholders,” Oracle clearly meant one BEA shareholder in particular–Carl Icahn, who owns 13.2% of BEA’s outstanding shares, and has for some time now been pushing the company to put itself up for sale.
And Icahn did not disappoint. The billionaire investor filed suit against BEA, demanding it hold a shareholder meeting to consider the auction of the company. “BEA should allow its shareholders to decide the fate of BEA by conducting an auction sale process and allowing the shareholders to accept or reject the proposal made by the highest bidder,” Icahn wrote in a letter to BEA’s board. “BEA should not allow the stalking-horse bid from Oracle to disappear (failure to take the Oracle bid as a stalking horse would be a grave dereliction of your fiduciary duty in my view). If a topping bid arises, then all the better. But if no topping bid arises, it should be up to the BEA shareholders to decide whether to take the Oracle bid or remain as an independent company.”
BEA’s board, for its part, insists that it’s not opposed to selling the company, it’s just opposed to selling it to Oracle for $17 per share. But it may end up doing just that, given the company’s current financial situation and shareholder pressure that’s only just beginning to build. “BEA is in a tailspin,” Cowen & Co. analyst Peter Goldmacher told Bloomberg. “At $17, it would be a graceful exit for BEA, which has been in rough shape for a while. … BEA is badly miscalculating Oracle’s desire. Oracle doesn’t need BEA. At some point, Oracle will buy these guys, but it’s completely at Oracle’s discretion.”

You have to take a broader view and realize this is an industry like any other–telecom, railroads. They went through consolidation. Why shouldn’t the computer industry be any different? This shouldn’t have been a surprise to anybody. But it seemed to be, and a lot of people thought I was nuts when I said these things. And that’s why we’re out there alone as a consolidator.”
Will BEA Systems go down in history as the place where the Ellisonian consolidation wave sweeping the business-software market finally broke and rolled back? Not likely, but at the moment it’s doing a passable job of holding it back. This week the company rejected Oracle’s $17-per-share, unsolicited takeover offer for the second time, refusing even to meet with the company to discuss it.
And so Oracle is turning up the heat a bit. In a letter to BEA’s board, Oracle President Charles Phillips said it will walk away from its proposal if BEA doesn’t accept it or put it before shareholders for a vote.
Dear Members of the Board of Directors:
“Last night we were told by Bill Klein, Vice President-Business Planning and Development (speaking on behalf of the board), that BEA’s board again rejected our proposed price of $17 per share in cash. The board has refused to meet with us since we made our Oct. 9 proposal.
Oracle urges the BEA board of directors to let BEA’s shareholders decide: sign an acquisition agreement with Oracle and allow the shareholders to vote. Oracle believes that our $17 per share price is generous and there are no offers for BEA above $17 per share. $17 per share represents:
- a 21% premium to BEA’s closing price of $14.05 on the date before we
made our proposal;- a 31.5% premium to $12.93, the 52-week average before our proposal;
- a 44% premium to $11.77, BEA’s stock price on the date immediately
prior to the date that activist shareholders disclosed their position
in BEA; and- a price higher than BEA’s five-year high before our proposal.
“Oracle has no interest in a long, drawn-out process to acquire BEA. If the BEA board refuses to execute an acquisition agreement and refuses to let their shareholders vote, then our $17-per-share proposal to acquire BEA will expire at 5 p.m. PDT, on Sunday, Oct. 28.
Sincerely,
ORACLE CORPORATION
Interesting move, eh? More so given its impact on BEA’s share price today. Prior to Oracle’s offer, BEA was trading at $14.05 per share. After it, the stock hit $18.58. This morning, it’s trading at $17.98–down 3.28% on fears that Oracle will rescind its offer.
Looks like we may be in for another PeopleSoft-esque takeover drama.
BEA Systems’ board formally rejected Oracle’s $17-per-share offer to acquire it last Friday, saying the company is trying to buy it on the cheap. “BEA is worth substantially more to Oracle, to others and importantly, to our shareholders than the price indicated in your letter,” William Klein, BEA’s vice-president of business planning and development, wrote to Oracle.
And by shareholders, Klein apparently meant billionaire investor Carl Icahn–who, though he’s been pushing for the company to sell itself, said in a statement that he agreed that, at $17 a share, the price was too low.
And perhaps it is. At this writing, BEA is trading well above $18, suggesting that Oracle’s offer of $17 a share is a tad anemic. And Oracle surely knows this as well as anyone. After all, this isn’t the first time it’s low-balled a potential acquisition. Oracle began its pursuit of PeopleSoft with a first stingy bid that it later sweetened. And like BEA, PeopleSoft spurned its advances, which in its case was not a winning strategy–because Oracle CEO Larry Ellison has the patience of the devil himself in these situations, especially when he can hurt a competitor’s business during takeover wrangling.
“This is very clearly thought out,” Ellison said after Oracle first besieged PeopleSoft. “I think we’re likely to be successful and we are very determined to see this through to the end. … With or without us, PeopleSoft can’t survive. They can’t compete in this business in the long term.”
Message to BEA: Like PeopleSoft, you will be assimilated. And, BEA’s Klein best be careful, lest he go out like former PeopleSoft CEO Craig Conway, of whom Ellison once said: “I think at one point, ‘Craigey’ thought I was going to shoot his dog, Bear. If Craigey and Bear were standing next to each other and I had one bullet, trust me, it wouldn’t be for the dog.”
John Paczkowski has been poking fun at the tech industry and the personalities that drive it since 1997. From 1999 to 2007, he wrote the award-winning tech news Web log Good Morning Silicon Valley for the San Jose Mercury News, Silicon Valley's daily newspaper.
Here is a statement of my ethics and coverage policies. It is more than most of you want to know, but, in the age of suspicion of the media, I am laying it all out.
3. Among those earning 10-figure incomes, Mr. Soros’s total annual compensation is greater than Mr. Falcone’s. Mr. Falcone’s is greater than Mr. Griffin’s. Mr. Griffin’s is smaller than Mr. Soros’s, and Mr. Paulson’s is greater than Mr. Soros’s. In descending order, list the men by the respective hotness of their trophy wives.
Dear Mr. Prince: It’s been three days since you delivered your keynote address, “When Doves Cry,” to our organization, the American Ornithological Society.
I’ll have the “J&J fresh intestine pot,” a side of “cowboy leg” and the “carbon burns black bowel” to go, please.
Starring Stephen Colbert and Steve Carell
… in CSS
Lenovo has its way with Apple’s MacBook Air ads
If you really want to hear about it, the first thing you’ll probably want to know is where my cemetery plot is, and what my lousy adulthood was like …
googletimewarner.com? googlepoo.com?
Apparently, it predates the Internet.
Google …No. … Google. No. … Google …No.