All Things Digital

Skip to main content.

Digital Daily

Palm Disappoints

images

The second-quarter loss Palm reported Thursday afternoon was narrower than the one it reported last year, but still fell far short of what Wall Street had been expecting. The smartphone maker lost 37 cents a share for the period on sales of $302 million. Analysts had been expecting a net loss of 32 cents per share on revenue of $266.2 million.

Palm (PALM) did manage to ship a total of 783,000 smartphone units during the quarter, though, a five percent decrease from last quarter, but a year-over-year increase of 41 percent. That said, the company actually sold only 573,000 units, down 29 percent from the previous quarter and down four percent year-over-year. Seems the launch of the Pixi wasn’t quite as successful as Palm had hoped.

“We are continuing to execute strongly against our long-term strategy with the delivery of Palm Pixi, the new carrier launches completed this quarter, and the upcoming opening of Palm’s full developer program,” said Jon Rubinstein, Palm’s chairman and chief executive officer.

“We’re still in the early stages of a long race,” Rubinstein added, “and we’re energized by the opportunity to compete in this exciting market. We remain confident that Palm’s innovative product design capabilities, integrated cloud services and the differentiated and delightful Palm webOS experience will provide the foundation for our sustained success.”

Once again, Palm did not break out unit sales of the Pre or Pixi in its earnings release, below. At $11.26, Palm shares are down 3.92 percent in after-hours trading.

Palm Reports Q2 FY 2010 Results

SUNNYVALE, Calif.– Palm, Inc. (NASDAQ: PALM) today reported that total revenues in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, ended Nov. 27, 2009, were $78.1 million. Gross profit was $5.5 million, and gross margin was 7.0 percent. These results include the effects of subscription accounting applied to Palm(R) webOS(TM) products as required by GAAP.(1) In accordance with this methodology, revenues and direct cost of revenues for Palm webOS products (currently Palm Pre(TM) and Palm Pixi(TM) smartphones) are deferred and recognized over the products’ estimated economic lives.

To facilitate comparisons to Palm’s historical results, Palm has included non-GAAP adjusted measures, which exclude the impact of subscription accounting, stock-based compensation and other items detailed later in this release. The company believes this information will help investors better evaluate its current period performance and trends in its business.

Non-GAAP Adjusted Revenues in the second quarter totaled $302.0 million, non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Profit was $77.3 million and non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Margin was 25.6 percent.

“We are continuing to execute strongly against our long-term strategy with the delivery of Palm Pixi, the new carrier launches completed this quarter, and the upcoming opening of Palm’s full developer program,” said Jon Rubinstein, Palm’s chairman and chief executive officer. “We’re still in the early stages of a long race, and we’re energized by the opportunity to compete in this exciting market. We remain confident that Palm’s innovative product design capabilities, integrated cloud services and the differentiated and delightful Palm webOS experience will provide the foundation for our sustained success.”

The company shipped a total of 783,000 smartphone units during the quarter, representing a 5 percent decrease from the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and a year-over-year increase of 41 percent compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. Smartphone sell-through for the second quarter was 573,000 units, down 29 percent from the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and down 4 percent year-over-year.

On a GAAP basis, net loss applicable to common stockholders for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $(85.4) million, or $(0.54) per diluted common share. This compares to a net loss applicable to common stockholders for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 of $(508.6) million or $(4.64) per diluted common share. The company’s second quarter of fiscal year 2009 results included a non-cash charge with a net impact of $396.7 million to the tax provision pertaining to the increase of the valuation allowance for the Company’s U.S. deferred tax assets.

The company’s net loss applicable to common stockholders on a GAAP basis reflects accounting guidance, effective in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, which requires the anti-dilutive provisions of Palm’s series C preferred shares and related warrants to be treated as derivatives for financial reporting purposes. The fair value of the derivatives were estimated as of the first day of fiscal year 2010 and are marked to market on a quarterly basis, with any change in value reflected in the company’s financial results for the period. The series C derivatives balance was $178.7 million at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to $235.0 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. This reduction in fair value resulted in a $56.3 million non-cash gain on series C derivatives and was reflected in the company’s second quarter GAAP financial results. With regard to the series C derivatives, any future increases in Palm’s stock price from period to period will be reflected as a non-cash loss on these derivatives in the company’s financial results, and any future decreases will be reflected as a non-cash gain in the company’s financial results.

Non-GAAP Net Loss for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $(59.6) million, or $(0.37) per diluted share. This compares to a non-GAAP Net Loss for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 of $(80.2) million, or $(0.73) per diluted share.

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 totaled $(70.1) million. EBITDA, adjusted to exclude the impact of subscription accounting, stock-based compensation, net other income (expense), restructuring charges and a gain on series C derivatives, or Adjusted EBITDA, totaled $(48.3) million.

The company’s cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments balance was $590.0 million at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2010. This includes net proceeds of approximately $360 million from the company’s public equity offering, which closed on Sept. 23, 2009. Cash from operations for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $16.7 million.

Palm may periodically provide new software features free of charge to customers of its Palm webOS products and currently recognizes Palm webOS product revenues and related standard cost of revenues on a subscription basis based on the applicable product’s estimated economic life, which is currently 24 months. The company records deferred revenues and deferred cost of revenues on its balance sheet, and amortizes them into earnings on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic product life.

Palm announced today that it expects to early adopt two recently released accounting standards related to revenue recognition, Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-13 and ASU No. 2009-14, effective for its third quarter of fiscal year 2010. These accounting changes will result in a substantial portion of Palm webOS product revenues being recognized upon delivery. The remaining Palm webOS revenues, which are related to future services and deliverables, will be recorded as deferred revenues on the company’s balance sheet, and amortized into earnings on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic product life, which is currently 24 months. Under the new standards, all related cost of revenues will be recognized upon delivery. This change in accounting will reduce the amount of revenues that Palm will defer on its balance sheet but will have no impact on cash flows and does not change how Palm accounts for Palm OS(R) products, like the Centro(TM), or its Treo(TM) line. Consistent with the company’s past practice, Palm will continue to provide non-GAAP, adjusted measures that exclude the impact of deferred revenue accounting, stock-based compensation and other items as appropriate.

We’ve launched a new commenting tool, Disqus. For the full story on all of its functionality, click here. To begin commenting right away, you can log in below using Disqus or Facebook Connect-—you can also log in using an existing AllThingsD account. Learn more about how Disqus collects and uses information in connection with the comments tool.

Comments

  1. Palm did pretty well considering the quarter was mostly based upon the sales of one phone – the Palm Pre. The Pixi was released only two weeks before the quarter ended, so logically it would not factor in much in the result.

    The third quarter should be more interesting. Here is the comparison – (a) Third quarter – Pre & Pixi phones at Sprint, and Pixi phone at Verizon; versus (b) Second quarter – mostly Pre phone at Sprint only. It is possible that both the Pre and Pixi phones will be released at Verizon in the third quarter, but the recent FCC filing only showed the Pixi.

    If you look at the result, I am sure my “friends” the analysts will forgive Palm (for the small loss, above analyst estimates) since Palm's revenue did exceed analyst expectations. The reason is that you cannot penalize a company that is investing heavily in research and development. Palm has hired some top talents in the developer area, and the announcement that the Ares development platform has gone public beta is quite newsworthy, since it brings a level of innovation that should accelerating the development of applications for the Palm Pre and Pixi phones. And the 800 applications in Palm's App Catalog is sufficient sign that developer activities are accelerating for the webOS platform – all this, before the Ares platform was even released. This is an indication that Palm as a company will continue to surprise.

    Palm has done more since the release of their smart phones to advance their products – barely six months old, than arguably any other company in the cell phone industry has ever done in the same period of time. This is an indication that the culture of innovation and “can do” within the company, runs quite deep!

    Conclusion: Verizon is BIG news for Palm, and should factor in heavily in Palm's third quarter result. Verizon's advertising budget is massive – which she has used effectively to push other smart phones. The Palm webOS operating system and the Palm Pre and Palm Pixi are the closest things Verizon will have to a mass market smart phone product – to compete against it's major competitor, AT&T's iPhone. But so also will the Pixi at Sprint, which was released too late in the second quarter (two weeks before close), to factor much in the second quarter result. Taking these factors into consideration should give Palm's investors reasons for optimism in 2010!

    Posted by Andrew Augustine at December 18th, 2009 at 9:20 am
  2. How many phones will Palm sell in 2010?

    Let me play the job of an analyst for once (though I am not one!):

    Speculating, Palm may already have sold 1 million Palm Pre phones in six months with one major carrier in North America – Sprint. At this rate, Palm is selling 2 million smart phones at Sprint per year, not factoring the Palm Pixi phone (whose sale barely began in the previous quarter).

    Verizon should easily sell over 2 milliom Palm Pre phones, though Verizon's number may come in at 3 million phones – at least 50% ahead of Sprint.

    AT&T and Palm's global partners may sell between 2 to 4 million phones, but we will stick to the 2 million number to be conservative – because of AT&T, which expressed interest in the Palm Pre, but we have not received any definitive news to date.

    So far, if we add up the sales numbers above, we have conservative sales of 6 million Palm Pre phones (2 million from Sprint, 2 million from Verizon, and 2 million from AT&T and global companies).

    The Palm Pixi is a mass market phone because of its design, form factor, and cost. The Palm Pixi could easily sell in the range of 12 million phones, twice as many phones as the Palm Pre, but to be conservative we will assume that the Palm Pixi generates only 6 million in sales in 2010, half our estimate.

    Now let us assume that because of the Palm Pixi, Palm sells only 4 million in Palm Pre phones, 2 million less than our 6 million estimate, because some of the Palm Pre's potential customers may decide to buy the Pixi.

    Summary: So as a result of our analysis above, we will estimate a sales of 4 million Palm Pre phones and 6 million Palm Pixi phones in 2010.

    Further assumption: Palm generates $300 million in revenue for approximately every 500,000 Palm Pre sold, and $150 million for every 500,000 Palm Pixi sold. (Note that these are not official number). If you are curious, these numbers calculate to a contract price of $600 for each Palm Pre phone, and $300 for each Palm Pixi phone. (Again, these are unofficial numbers – based upon intelligent guess).

    Conclusion: In 2010, assuming that the Palm Pre sells 4 million (with revenues of $2.4 billion, deduced from above) and the mass market Palm Pixi sells 6 million (with revenues of $1.8 billion), Palm's revenue for 2010 could come in at $4.2 billion (this reflects the 2010 calender year, from Jan 1, 2010 to Dec 31, 2010, which does not reflect Palm's fiscal year). In contrast, Palm is currently generating revenue at the rate of approximately $1.2 billion for a 12 month period. But alas, Palm's revenue for the 2010 calender year would likely be much different from the numbers speculated here.

    Posted by Andrew Augustine at December 18th, 2009 at 11:20 am

Add a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Sign up here or log in below.

Comments posted on this site must be signed with your full, real name. Please see our Comments policy for details.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Best of Digital Daily

Latest Digital Daily Videos

More Videos »

About John

John Paczkowski has been poking fun at the tech industry and the personalities that drive it since 1997. From 1999 to 2007, he wrote the award-winning tech news Web log Good Morning Silicon Valley for the San Jose Mercury News, Silicon Valley's daily newspaper. Read more »

Ethics Statement

Here is a statement of my ethics and coverage policies. It is more than most of you want to know, but, in the age of suspicion of the media, I am laying it all out.

Read more »

alt.misc

Older at alt.misc »