All Things Digital

Skip to main content.

Digital Daily

Google’s Chrome OS: “It Just Works”

photo

Speaking at Microsoft’s Worldwide Partner Conference in New Orleans this past July, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said of Google’s forthcoming Chrome OS, “Who knows what this thing is?”

Today, he found out. The operating system, a direct challenge to Microsoft Windows, was on display at a media gathering at the Google HQ this morning.

Sundar Pichai, vice president of product management, and Matthew Papakipos, engineering director for Google Chrome OS, presided over the event, which the company described as a “technical announcement.”

That meant that Google (GOOG) was not releasing a beta of the operating system this week, as had been rumored.

That said, it was an overview of Chrome, as well as Google’s plans for its launch in 2010, so let the Chrome OS liveblogging begin:

  • There will be no beta today. Pichai says Google is still a year away from an official launch. However, the company is making the code available today.
  • Pichai says that a year after launch, the Chrome browser has some 40 millions users. He boasts about the browser’s speed, noting that it handles Javascript 39 times faster than Microsoft’s (MSFT) Internet Explorer. There will be three more big Chrome announcements sometime in the future: Chrome for Mac, Chrome for Linux and the debut of Chrome Extensions.
  • Google’s goal is to ensure that Web applications function as well as desktop apps. Pichai says that the company is figuring out a way for Web apps to safely take advantage of the operating system in the way desktop apps do. A few examples: Graphics, video/audio applications, real-time communication, notification and local storage.

    “By 2010 we expect to have all these things built into Chrome,” Pichai adds.

  • The advent of Chrome coincides with a perfect storm of converging trends, Pichai says, noting the tremendous popularity of netbooks during the recession, the growing acceptance of cloud apps and the rapid innovation in mobile devices. Smartphones are becoming more like laptops, Pichai adds, and laptops are becoming more like smartphones. Is there a better level of computing available for these devices?

    There is, according to Pichai, and Google believes it is Chrome OS.

  • Among Chrome OS’s advantages, Pichai says: Speed, simplicity and security. Every application will be a Web application. There will be no desktop apps. Chrome OS is essentially a browser with a few modifications. All data in the Chrome OS resides in the cloud. Pichai: “We want all of personal computing to work that way….If I lose my Chrome machine, I should be able to go out, buy a new [one] and re-create my previous computing experience easily.”

    Chrome OS will run completely inside the browser security model, he adds, noting that security is one of Google’s top priorities along with speed. “Turning on a PC should be like turning on your TV,” he says.

  • Chrome OS is very similar in appearance to the Chrome browser. “Chrome OS is Chrome,” says Pichai. Google made it look like a browser, because the browser is familiar.
  • And indeed, Chrome OS does look quite a bit like a browser. Multiple apps load into tabs, for example. It also features “Panels,” which Pichai describes as persistent lightweight windows. “All Chrome data resides in the cloud. Anything you put in the machine is immediately available to you anywhere.”
  • As netbooks become more advanced and battery life improves, they will evolve into entertainment devices, says Pichai, who notes that via Google Books, a netbook can become an e-reader, and, through YouTube, a video device.
  • A quick demo of the user interface, which seems very simple and intuitive. “It just works,” says Pichai in an unintentional nod to Apple (AAPL).

    An interesting remark: Anyone who writes an app for the Web has written an app for Chrome, says Pichai, joking that Microsoft is already developing for it.

  • Speed, simplicity and security, says Pichai. We’re trying to make the computing experience delightful.
  • With that, Pichai hands the stage over to Engineering Director Matt Papakipos.

  • Papakipos, too, offers the “we want to make computing delightful” sound byte and notes once again that turning on the PC should be like turning on the TV.
  • Chrome OS eliminates the bootloader, auto-launching the browser. The OS also auto-updates itself, making sure that it’s always current with security patches, etc. Everything from the firmware to the kernel is secured with a cryptographic signature to ensure a secure boot. In the event malware is detected, the system repairs itself automatically.
  • The basic application security protocol for current operating systems allows apps the same privileges as the user. This presents obvious security issues. Whenever you install a new app, you’re taking a risk, says Papakipos.

    But Web applications like those that Chrome OS use, are different. They are Web apps, so they don’t have system-level privileges. Additionally, all apps run in secured sandboxes that are separate from one other and from the OS. Finally, all apps must be signed and verified before each use.

  • In terms of file systems, Chrome’s is locked down. It’s a read-only root-file system, obviously quite different from other operating systems. All user data are encrypted and synched to the cloud. Essentially, Google uses the PC for caching. Again, if you should lose your machine, you buy a new one, fire it up and it synchs with the cloud, restoring your previous computing experience.
  • How will Google bring Chrome OS to market? The company is working with vendors to specify reference hardware. You cannot download and install Chrome on just any device, you will have to purchase a Chrome device. Google is looking at a launch window of late 2010, before the holidays.
  • Google sounds very concerned about the end-user Chrome OS experience. Pichai says the company wants to ensure that the displays, keyboard, etc., on the netbooks that run Chrome are robust and easy to use.
  • Pichai wraps things up, but before the Q&A, we’re shown a short explanatory video. “The first thing I want to do when I fire up my computer is browse the Internet….If there isn’t any Internet, I might not even use my computer….What if when you pressed on, your PC turned on, what if your operating system was more like a Web browser…what if it was a browser?…Chrome OS is a totally rethought computer that lets you focus on the Internet, which is what most of use our computers for these days anyway.”
  • Q&A

    At this point, Pichai opens the event to questions:

    If you’re specifying hardware components, do you must have an idea of what they’ll cost?

    A: We expect Chrome netbooks to be in the price range of what people have come to expect….We are not specifying a price target. Price will be determined at the OEM level.

    Will the APIs support W3C standards?

    A: We’re working very closely with the W3C to standardize as much as we can….In general, we want to see everything standardized across multiple browsers.

    Will there be an application store?

    A: The Web offers hundreds of millions of applications. Our job is to make people aware of them.

    What about desktop applications that are not available on the Web?

    A: We expect most of our users to have a second machine at home….Chrome OS is about a delightful experience on the Web….If you’re a lawyer spending your entire day on contracts, etc., this is not the machine for you.

    Will you support Microsoft Silverlight?

    A: In the case of certain selection plug-ins, we are working to integrate them. No comment beyond that.

    Since Chrome is open source, could people build their own variations?

    A: Yes. We expect people will do many interesting things with it.

    Do you see Chrome running on laptops or desktops?

    A: We’re initially focused on netbook-like form factors–clamshells, etc. That said, the OS is being developed to work on other devices.

    Is there any level of offline access? What happens when I’m on a plane and don’t want to pay for Wi-Fi?

    A: Chrome devices are primarily intended to be Internet-connected. That said, it will have some caching abilities so, for example, you could play a game offline.

    Virtualization?

    A: Yes. You could run Chrome today on a virtual machine.

    Are you working with outfits like Adobe to, say, build a Web-friendly version of Photoshop?

    A: We’re very excited by things like Photoshop on the Web and we’re working hard to make that possible.

    Will Android apps work on Chrome? Are there plans for third-party apps?

    A: [Pichai dodges this one.] If it’s a Web app, it will work on Chrome. The Web works very, very well for our purposes.

    Will Chrome work on both X86 and ARM?

    A: Yes.

    Is there a direct business model for Chrome OS or is this another variation of the-more-people-that-use-the-Web-the-better-for-Google?

    A: We are working with partners. No plans for advertising. That said, Pichai notes again that anything that runs on the Web will run on Chrome. And of course, AdWords does, indeed, run on the Web.

    [Sergey Brin joins the Q&A]

    Do you want Android Apps to run on Chrome?

    A: We are focused on creating the use case in which everything is a Web application, but hopefully we can do more in the future.

    How does Chrome handle peripherals? Can it print?

    A: Most keyboards, cameras, phones, etc., will work. In terms of printing…yes, Chrome OS will print and we’re working hard to make that possible.

    What is Chrome’s strategic position for Google?

    A: [Brin]: Call us dumb businessmen, but we really focus on user needs rather than focus on business strategies. We believe that the Web platform is a much simpler way of computing for individuals to use, and that’s a very important need in the market right now. That’s what we’re trying to fulfill.

We’ve launched a new commenting tool, Disqus. For the full story on all of its functionality, click here. To begin commenting right away, you can log in below using Facebook Connect or Disqus—you can also log in using an existing AllThingsD account. Learn more about how Disqus collects and uses information in connection with the comments tool.
  • Steve Ziring
    The Google logo incorporated with the death star, nice touch. Are you implying they are part of the dark side or simply looking for world domination?

    So what's the real motive behind this OS?
    Maybe to entice people to use Google products (search engines, email, browsers).

    Maybe it's simply meant to keep would be competitors distracted by diverting resources back into their own OS development teams. Thus taking the focus away from Google's core business of search engines and advertising.

    Thoughts?
  • Mark Pavia
    Umm...Eric Schmidt is NOT the CEO of Microsoft as it states in the 1st sentence of this article. Did Eric Schmidt really speak at Microsoft's Partner conference about the benefits of Chrome at the same Microsoft owned venue where Steve Ballmer questioned Chrome? I think this article has some flaws in it if I'm reading it as it is written.
  • Mark Pavia
    I see you changed Eric's name to Steve's without issuing a correction statement. Well, now at least the article makes sense.
  • Mark, you are correct. This was, however, an editing error--my editing error--not an author error, i.e., not from John. You spotted the error before my read-through. Good job! Thank you.
  • Fred Hamranhansenhansen
    > So what’s the real motive
    > behind this OS?

    I don't think you have to look for a suspicious strategic reason for Google to produce a product when the market they're going into has only 1 competitor and that competitor is on fire and billowing smoke for 10 years plus. There is no PC OS that "just works". People are buying Windows 7 PC's and they still get 80% of XP malware and viruses and they don't even get a modern browser! It's a massive technical failure that should be answered by other vendors.

    If all of my computing is confined to a Web browser (like 90% of us), then buying a $500 PC with Google Chrome OS instead of a $500 PC with Windows 7 offers me these legitimate technical advantages:

    - PC boots in 10 seconds instead of 1:30
    - no viruses or anti-virus subscription required
    - no commercial malware or anti-malware subscription required
    - browser is twice as fast
    - browser offers 2009 level of Web technology instead of 2003
    - browser is compatible with standardized (HTML5) Web apps made for iPhone, iPod touch, Blackberry, Android, Palm, Mac, and other computer systems instead of being compatible with IE6 Web apps which are no longer being produced
    - the whole computer is "stateless", meaning I can login to any Chrome OS device and see my Desktop, as opposed to having to login to my 1 Windows PC which is probably down with a virus
    - no application installs, no library conflicts which made Windows famous
    - no Windows Tax
    - no proprietary Microsoft file formats which require me to use Microsoft software to work with them
    - no need to authorize the operating system, no way for it to stop working because of authorization server failure
    - vastly simplified interface that gets out of the way of Web content
    - migrating to a new PC later involves: 1) buy new PC, 2) login to new PC, instead of for example, the 20+ hour migration from Windows XP to 7
    - read-only boot partition instead of a malware-infested boot partition
    - automatic security patches instead of 10,000 manual patches you can never keep track of
    - new OS update very year instead of every 3-4 years

    That's just off the top of my head.

    Over the past few years, Apple took 90% of the high-end PC market, and they'll continue to have that because in the high-end market you need apps like Photoshop and Final Cut which are not coming to the Web for many, many years yet. The reason for this domination of that segment is that a high-end Dell to run Photoshop will cost the same as a Mac to run Photoshop, but the Dell gets viruses and requires much more I-T support (not to mention has no built-in color management like Mac OS).

    The same thing is going to happen to the low-end PC market over the next few years. People will be faced with 2 very similar low-end PC platforms (Chrome OS and Windows 7) but the Windows 7 system will get viruses and require much more I-T support. When you throw in the wild card of an Apple tablet running iPhone OS, the low-end Windows PC market is toast.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest Digital Daily Videos

More Videos »

About John

John Paczkowski has been poking fun at the tech industry and the personalities that drive it since 1997. From 1999 to 2007, he wrote the award-winning tech news Web log Good Morning Silicon Valley for the San Jose Mercury News, Silicon Valley's daily newspaper. Read more »

Ethics Statement

Here is a statement of my ethics and coverage policies. It is more than most of you want to know, but, in the age of suspicion of the media, I am laying it all out.

Read more »

alt.misc

Older at alt.misc »