<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Bluetooth on Its Way Out?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091014/is-bluetooth-on-its-way-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091014/is-bluetooth-on-its-way-out/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:20:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; WiFi Direct kontra Blåtand - trådløs kamp eller bare hype? - Bizzen - IT &#38; Business</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091014/is-bluetooth-on-its-way-out/comment-page-1/#comment-16255</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; WiFi Direct kontra Blåtand - trådløs kamp eller bare hype? - Bizzen - IT &#38; Business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26602#comment-16255</guid>
		<description>[...] er dog også sikkerhedsaspekter involveret. Som det nævnes i kommentarer hos All Things Digital (Wall Street Journal-site) så kan blåtandens relativt korte rækkevide beskytte en del mod [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] er dog også sikkerhedsaspekter involveret. Som det nævnes i kommentarer hos All Things Digital (Wall Street Journal-site) så kan blåtandens relativt korte rækkevide beskytte en del mod [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Hamranhansenhansen</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091014/is-bluetooth-on-its-way-out/comment-page-1/#comment-16050</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hamranhansenhansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26602#comment-16050</guid>
		<description>The reason I think Bluetooth is not threatened by Wi-Fi and vice versa is that they are on the same chip now. So going to Wi-Fi only doesn&#039;t necessarily get you much benefit at the cost of never being able to connect to a Bluetooth accessory again, and they are very common, and very cheap. Your wireless chip would shrink a little, but you can shrink it with a smaller process while keeping Bluetooth compatibility.

The latest thing in wireless chips is adding other stuff like FM, not taking away previous standards. Wi-Fi &quot;a&quot; is still in there today, even though there were only like 5 &quot;a&quot; devices ever made, and all in 1999 as far as I remember.

Also, the short-range nature of Bluetooth is much better suited to keyboards and similar accessories which you don&#039;t want to broadcast to the whole neighborhood (even though it&#039;s encrypted) because that just invites cracking and key-logging. Same with microphones and headphones. The fact that you are wireless but your signal is basically confined to the room you&#039;re in is a significant feature of Bluetooth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason I think Bluetooth is not threatened by Wi-Fi and vice versa is that they are on the same chip now. So going to Wi-Fi only doesn&#8217;t necessarily get you much benefit at the cost of never being able to connect to a Bluetooth accessory again, and they are very common, and very cheap. Your wireless chip would shrink a little, but you can shrink it with a smaller process while keeping Bluetooth compatibility.</p>
<p>The latest thing in wireless chips is adding other stuff like FM, not taking away previous standards. Wi-Fi &#8220;a&#8221; is still in there today, even though there were only like 5 &#8220;a&#8221; devices ever made, and all in 1999 as far as I remember.</p>
<p>Also, the short-range nature of Bluetooth is much better suited to keyboards and similar accessories which you don&#8217;t want to broadcast to the whole neighborhood (even though it&#8217;s encrypted) because that just invites cracking and key-logging. Same with microphones and headphones. The fact that you are wireless but your signal is basically confined to the room you&#8217;re in is a significant feature of Bluetooth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wi-Fi Direct vs. Bluetooth &#8212; Wifi Direct Marketing</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091014/is-bluetooth-on-its-way-out/comment-page-1/#comment-16031</link>
		<dc:creator>Wi-Fi Direct vs. Bluetooth &#8212; Wifi Direct Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26602#comment-16031</guid>
		<description>[...] “made wires and cable obsolete,” said John Paczkowski in All Things Digital, and a new standard from the Wi-Fi Alliance may do the same to Bluetooth. Wi-Fi Direct, like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “made wires and cable obsolete,” said John Paczkowski in All Things Digital, and a new standard from the Wi-Fi Alliance may do the same to Bluetooth. Wi-Fi Direct, like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Welch</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091014/is-bluetooth-on-its-way-out/comment-page-1/#comment-15995</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26602#comment-15995</guid>
		<description>I can only imagine the panic on the face of the IT person I ask to purchase me a Wifi (Direct or otherwise) mouse for my Mac Pro. 

They are panic-stricken every time the acronym Wifi is even mentioned, because of a lack of security with early Wifi networks. Not surprising for a company that considers XP Pro a new OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only imagine the panic on the face of the IT person I ask to purchase me a Wifi (Direct or otherwise) mouse for my Mac Pro. </p>
<p>They are panic-stricken every time the acronym Wifi is even mentioned, because of a lack of security with early Wifi networks. Not surprising for a company that considers XP Pro a new OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gorgen</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091014/is-bluetooth-on-its-way-out/comment-page-1/#comment-15961</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gorgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26602#comment-15961</guid>
		<description>Maybe. But this is vaporware: &quot;The Wi-Fi Alliance plans to publish its peer-to-peer specification upon completion.&quot;

Most present uses of Bluetooth don&#039;t need more bandwidth. And more bandwidth and range demand more power. Don&#039;t expect a phone headset using Wi-Fi Direct to be nice and discreet, because it will need a big honkin&#039; battery to drive it. 

Antennas may have to be bigger too. Try grafting a WiFi router&#039;s external antenna to your headset, and see how cool you look now...

Who uses Bluetooth to &quot;transfer content and share applications&quot;? It&#039;s used mainly for streaming. Stereo audio, mouse motion, printer data, GPS fixes: all are bandwidth limited at the source or destination, not in the link.

Bluetooth 2.0 is fine for all of the above. At least Bluetooth 3.0 incorporates 2.0. &quot;Wi-Fi Direct&quot; shows no indication of having a low-power fallback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe. But this is vaporware: &#8220;The Wi-Fi Alliance plans to publish its peer-to-peer specification upon completion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Most present uses of Bluetooth don&#8217;t need more bandwidth. And more bandwidth and range demand more power. Don&#8217;t expect a phone headset using Wi-Fi Direct to be nice and discreet, because it will need a big honkin&#8217; battery to drive it. </p>
<p>Antennas may have to be bigger too. Try grafting a WiFi router&#8217;s external antenna to your headset, and see how cool you look now&#8230;</p>
<p>Who uses Bluetooth to &#8220;transfer content and share applications&#8221;? It&#8217;s used mainly for streaming. Stereo audio, mouse motion, printer data, GPS fixes: all are bandwidth limited at the source or destination, not in the link.</p>
<p>Bluetooth 2.0 is fine for all of the above. At least Bluetooth 3.0 incorporates 2.0. &#8220;Wi-Fi Direct&#8221; shows no indication of having a low-power fallback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bye Bye Bluetooth &#124; TechDusts</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091014/is-bluetooth-on-its-way-out/comment-page-1/#comment-15960</link>
		<dc:creator>Bye Bye Bluetooth &#124; TechDusts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26602#comment-15960</guid>
		<description>[...] All Things Digital (WSJ) : Is Bluetooth on Its Way Out? by John Paczkowski [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All Things Digital (WSJ) : Is Bluetooth on Its Way Out? by John Paczkowski [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Bluetooth on its Way Out? [Digital Daily]</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091014/is-bluetooth-on-its-way-out/comment-page-1/#comment-15955</link>
		<dc:creator>TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Bluetooth on its Way Out? [Digital Daily]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26602#comment-15955</guid>
		<description>[...] more here: Is Bluetooth on its Way Out? [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here: Is Bluetooth on its Way Out? [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
