<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Mobile 6.5 Slightly Less Unmemorable Than Predecessor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091006/windows-mobile-6-5-released-into-wild/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091006/windows-mobile-6-5-released-into-wild/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sources: Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.5 to Be Renamed Windows Phone Classic &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091006/windows-mobile-6-5-released-into-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-26212</link>
		<dc:creator>Sources: Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.5 to Be Renamed Windows Phone Classic &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26055#comment-26212</guid>
		<description>[...] to be the new aegis under which Microsoft markets its mobile OS, the company can’t afford to have four-month-old Windows Mobile 6.5 muddling its branding. So the company is renaming it. The rumored moniker: &#8220;Windows Phone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to be the new aegis under which Microsoft markets its mobile OS, the company can’t afford to have four-month-old Windows Mobile 6.5 muddling its branding. So the company is renaming it. The rumored moniker: &#8220;Windows Phone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reminder: Microsoft&#8217;s WinMo on 18 Percent of US smartphones &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091006/windows-mobile-6-5-released-into-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-25502</link>
		<dc:creator>Reminder: Microsoft&#8217;s WinMo on 18 Percent of US smartphones &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26055#comment-25502</guid>
		<description>[...] next week and the likely debut of Microsoft’s (MSFT) Windows Mobile 7 operating system: As widely maligned as it is, Windows Mobile is still running on 18 percent of U.S. smartphones by the end of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] next week and the likely debut of Microsoft’s (MSFT) Windows Mobile 7 operating system: As widely maligned as it is, Windows Mobile is still running on 18 percent of U.S. smartphones by the end of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Crain</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091006/windows-mobile-6-5-released-into-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-23068</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Crain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26055#comment-23068</guid>
		<description>moron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>moron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CES: Steve Ballmer Keynote &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091006/windows-mobile-6-5-released-into-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-21734</link>
		<dc:creator>CES: Steve Ballmer Keynote &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26055#comment-21734</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows Mobile 6.5, a necessary stopgap on the path to 7.0 &#8211; which debuted last fall in a nimbus of dissapointment. Ballmer notes that Microsoft is announcing a new Windows Phone partnership today with T-Mobile [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows Mobile 6.5, a necessary stopgap on the path to 7.0 &#8211; which debuted last fall in a nimbus of dissapointment. Ballmer notes that Microsoft is announcing a new Windows Phone partnership today with T-Mobile [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Releases Windows Mobile 6.5, Opens Windows Mobile &#8230; &#124; All about windows 7</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091006/windows-mobile-6-5-released-into-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-15530</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Releases Windows Mobile 6.5, Opens Windows Mobile &#8230; &#124; All about windows 7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26055#comment-15530</guid>
		<description>[...] is the original post:  Microsoft Releases Windows Mobile 6.5, Opens Windows Mobile &#8230;   This entry was posted by Andrianq and posted on October 6, 2009 at 3:50 pm and filed under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the original post:  Microsoft Releases Windows Mobile 6.5, Opens Windows Mobile &#8230;   This entry was posted by Andrianq and posted on October 6, 2009 at 3:50 pm and filed under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Hamranhansenhansen</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091006/windows-mobile-6-5-released-into-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-15520</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hamranhansenhansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26055#comment-15520</guid>
		<description>&gt; It’s not the destination
&gt; for us, by any stretch
&gt; of the imagination, it’s
&gt; a step along the way.

BS. iPhone OS v2.0 was step along the way. There was a legitimate departure point of 1.0 and destination of 3.0. Windows Mobile 6.5 is just a coat of paint on top of Windows Mobile 6.0 which is actually older than the iPhone and should therefore be MORE mature, not less. Microsoft literally has nothing to contribute to this conversation. They generate heat but no light.

I stopped using Microsoft products in 1999 and have not looked back. Since then sometimes people would recommend a Microsoft product to me and I would just say &quot;why?&quot; and nobody has been able to give me an answer for that. They used to say &quot;because everybody uses it&quot; but I have not even heard that gem in a while. Why? Just blank stares.

Consider that it takes about 20 hours to upgrade a Windows XP box to Windows 7 following Microsoft&#039;s instructions, and you lose all of your installed apps and have to restore your documents from a backup. But you can buy a new Mac and import your Windows XP system into Fusion or Parallels (which cost less than Windows 7) in an hour or so, and keep your apps and documents where they are within your XP system. What is wrong with this picture? Shouldn&#039;t it be easier to go from NT 5.1 (XP) to NT 6.1 (7) than it is to go from NT 5.1 to Mac OS 10.6?

The funny thing is that Microsoft is moving so slowly that many of us are saying &quot;they&#039;re dead&quot; and their apologists are saying &quot;they&#039;re only sleeping&quot; but I&#039;m telling you, that is an ex-Microsoft. It is over. When their response to 2.5 years of iPhone is Windows Mobile 6.5? C&#039;mon c&#039;mon c&#039;mon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; It’s not the destination<br />
&gt; for us, by any stretch<br />
&gt; of the imagination, it’s<br />
&gt; a step along the way.</p>
<p>BS. iPhone OS v2.0 was step along the way. There was a legitimate departure point of 1.0 and destination of 3.0. Windows Mobile 6.5 is just a coat of paint on top of Windows Mobile 6.0 which is actually older than the iPhone and should therefore be MORE mature, not less. Microsoft literally has nothing to contribute to this conversation. They generate heat but no light.</p>
<p>I stopped using Microsoft products in 1999 and have not looked back. Since then sometimes people would recommend a Microsoft product to me and I would just say &#8220;why?&#8221; and nobody has been able to give me an answer for that. They used to say &#8220;because everybody uses it&#8221; but I have not even heard that gem in a while. Why? Just blank stares.</p>
<p>Consider that it takes about 20 hours to upgrade a Windows XP box to Windows 7 following Microsoft&#8217;s instructions, and you lose all of your installed apps and have to restore your documents from a backup. But you can buy a new Mac and import your Windows XP system into Fusion or Parallels (which cost less than Windows 7) in an hour or so, and keep your apps and documents where they are within your XP system. What is wrong with this picture? Shouldn&#8217;t it be easier to go from NT 5.1 (XP) to NT 6.1 (7) than it is to go from NT 5.1 to Mac OS 10.6?</p>
<p>The funny thing is that Microsoft is moving so slowly that many of us are saying &#8220;they&#8217;re dead&#8221; and their apologists are saying &#8220;they&#8217;re only sleeping&#8221; but I&#8217;m telling you, that is an ex-Microsoft. It is over. When their response to 2.5 years of iPhone is Windows Mobile 6.5? C&#8217;mon c&#8217;mon c&#8217;mon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Windows Mobile 6.5 Slightly Less Unmemorable Than Predecessor [Digital Daily]</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091006/windows-mobile-6-5-released-into-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-15469</link>
		<dc:creator>TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Windows Mobile 6.5 Slightly Less Unmemorable Than Predecessor [Digital Daily]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=26055#comment-15469</guid>
		<description>[...] link: Windows Mobile 6.5 Slightly Less Unmemorable Than Predecessor [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] link: Windows Mobile 6.5 Slightly Less Unmemorable Than Predecessor [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

