<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google to AT&amp;T: "Noisome Trumpeter"? Takes One to Know One.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: backyard chicken</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-86462</link>
		<dc:creator>backyard chicken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-86462</guid>
		<description>We are much from getting a post-racial society.  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are much from getting a post-racial society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rural Internet</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-32657</link>
		<dc:creator>Rural Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-32657</guid>
		<description>ATT is just complaining because they got outsmarted by Google.  Which is easy to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ATT is just complaining because they got outsmarted by Google.  Which is easy to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T, Google: Nuns on the Run &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-15983</link>
		<dc:creator>AT&#38;T, Google: Nuns on the Run &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-15983</guid>
		<description>[...] of them. In a 13 page letter to the Federal Communications Commission Wednesday, the carrier again said Google should play by the same rules as its telecom competitors and took issue with its claim that Google Voice restricts calls to certain rural areas to avoid the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of them. In a 13 page letter to the Federal Communications Commission Wednesday, the carrier again said Google should play by the same rules as its telecom competitors and took issue with its claim that Google Voice restricts calls to certain rural areas to avoid the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC Google Voice Probe: Ask, AT&#38;T, and it Shall Be Given Unto You &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-15745</link>
		<dc:creator>FCC Google Voice Probe: Ask, AT&#38;T, and it Shall Be Given Unto You &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 23:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-15745</guid>
		<description>[...] has inspired another Federal Communications Commission probe. Days after a group of House members, echoing a call first made by AT&amp;T (T) in September, asked the Federal Communications Commission to investigate Google Voice, the Commission obliged [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has inspired another Federal Communications Commission probe. Days after a group of House members, echoing a call first made by AT&amp;T (T) in September, asked the Federal Communications Commission to investigate Google Voice, the Commission obliged [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawmakers Ask FCC to Probe Google Voice [Digital Daily] &#124; TECHNICK</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-15675</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawmakers Ask FCC to Probe Google Voice [Digital Daily] &#124; TECHNICK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-15675</guid>
		<description>[...] that apply to broadband carriers simply because Google Voice is a free Internet application? AT&amp;T certainly doesn&#8217;t think so and it seems at least a few Congressional representatives agree. A group of them representing rural [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that apply to broadband carriers simply because Google Voice is a free Internet application? AT&amp;T certainly doesn&#8217;t think so and it seems at least a few Congressional representatives agree. A group of them representing rural [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawmakers Ask FCC to Probe Google Voice &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-15674</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawmakers Ask FCC to Probe Google Voice &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-15674</guid>
		<description>[...] that apply to broadband carriers simply because Google Voice is a free Internet application? AT&amp;T certainly doesn&#8217;t think so and it seems at least a few Congressional representatives agree. A group of them representing rural [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that apply to broadband carriers simply because Google Voice is a free Internet application? AT&amp;T certainly doesn&#8217;t think so and it seems at least a few Congressional representatives agree. A group of them representing rural [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;AT&#38;T Goes After Google Voice, Net Neutrality And Double Standards (Full Letter To FCC)&#8221; and related posts - KuASha Organization</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-14826</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;AT&#38;T Goes After Google Voice, Net Neutrality And Double Standards (Full Letter To FCC)&#8221; and related posts - KuASha Organization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-14826</guid>
		<description>[...] Google, the &quot;Most Noisome Tr&amp;#117&amp;#109&amp;#112eter of So-Called Net-Neutrality&quot; - Digital Daily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google, the &quot;Most Noisome Tr&amp;#117&amp;#109&amp;#112eter of So-Called Net-Neutrality&quot; - Digital Daily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacobW.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AT&#38;T, Google Spat Over Google Voice Blocked Calls Is Important&#8230; But Totally Misses The Point [techdirt.com]</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-14809</link>
		<dc:creator>jacobW.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AT&#38;T, Google Spat Over Google Voice Blocked Calls Is Important&#8230; But Totally Misses The Point [techdirt.com]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 03:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-14809</guid>
		<description>[...] well. It looks like AT&amp;T&#8217;s latest line of anti-Google attack is to accuse the company of being hypocritical on net neutrality by not living up to the same principles when it comes to its Google Voice product. The issue is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] well. It looks like AT&amp;T&#8217;s latest line of anti-Google attack is to accuse the company of being hypocritical on net neutrality by not living up to the same principles when it comes to its Google Voice product. The issue is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T, Google Spat Over Google Voice Blocked Calls Is Important&#8230; But Totally Misses The Point &#124; PHP Hosts</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-14798</link>
		<dc:creator>AT&#38;T, Google Spat Over Google Voice Blocked Calls Is Important&#8230; But Totally Misses The Point &#124; PHP Hosts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-14798</guid>
		<description>[...] well. It looks like AT&amp;T&#8217;s latest line of anti-Google attack is to accuse the company of being hypocritical on net neutrality by not living up to the same principles when it comes to its Google Voice product. The issue is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] well. It looks like AT&amp;T&#8217;s latest line of anti-Google attack is to accuse the company of being hypocritical on net neutrality by not living up to the same principles when it comes to its Google Voice product. The issue is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paczkowski</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-14795</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-14795</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s entirely plausible that AT&amp;T finds Google nauseating, which is another definition of the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s entirely plausible that AT&amp;T finds Google nauseating, which is another definition of the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Worrel</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-14793</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Worrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-14793</guid>
		<description>Interestngly enough, AT&amp;T still thinks that Google Voice isn&#039;t playing by the rules and wants to block the software as a &quot;violation of net neutrality.&quot; LOL you can&#039;t do that! Google is an Internet software company, not a telecommunications provider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestngly enough, AT&amp;T still thinks that Google Voice isn&#8217;t playing by the rules and wants to block the software as a &#8220;violation of net neutrality.&#8221; LOL you can&#8217;t do that! Google is an Internet software company, not a telecommunications provider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Elmer-DeWitt</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-14789</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elmer-DeWitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-14789</guid>
		<description>Someone should tell AT&amp;T that the word noisome means having an extremely offensive smell. It has nothing to do with noise or trumpets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone should tell AT&amp;T that the word noisome means having an extremely offensive smell. It has nothing to do with noise or trumpets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David McAuliff</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-14788</link>
		<dc:creator>David McAuliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-14788</guid>
		<description>&quot;You knocked my block off!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You knocked my block off!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google, the &#34;Most Noisome Trumpeter of So-Called Net-Neutrality&#34; Digital China</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-14785</link>
		<dc:creator>Google, the &#34;Most Noisome Trumpeter of So-Called Net-Neutrality&#34; Digital China</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-14785</guid>
		<description>[...] is the original: Google, the &quot;Most Noisome Trumpeter of So-Called Net-Neutrality&quot;          By admin &#124; category: Uncategorized &#124; tags: bureau, internet, joseph-matheny, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the original: Google, the &quot;Most Noisome Trumpeter of So-Called Net-Neutrality&quot;          By admin | category: Uncategorized | tags: bureau, internet, joseph-matheny, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google, the &#34;Most Noisome Trumpeter of So-Called Net-Neutrality&#34; [Digital Daily]</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090925/google-att/comment-page-1/#comment-14784</link>
		<dc:creator>TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google, the &#34;Most Noisome Trumpeter of So-Called Net-Neutrality&#34; [Digital Daily]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25526#comment-14784</guid>
		<description>[...] reading here: Google, the &quot;Most Noisome Trumpeter of So-Called Net-Neutrality&quot; [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading here: Google, the &quot;Most Noisome Trumpeter of So-Called Net-Neutrality&quot; [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

