<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Insert Lame "New Moto Phone CLIQs With Investors" Pun Here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090911/cliq-reacts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090911/cliq-reacts/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Hamranhansenhansen</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090911/cliq-reacts/comment-page-1/#comment-13757</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Hamranhansenhansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=24568#comment-13757</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s amazing with the branding is they are equating &quot;click&quot; with Web, but we&#039;re already almost 3 years into the tappable Web, the touch screen pocket Web, which Motorola is not involved in at all. FAIL. This is 2005&#039;s entry into the smartphone market, it&#039;s not even close to what is needed for 2010. Why would anyone turn down a $99 iPhone for the CLIQ? I can&#039;t come up with a single reason. And the MotoBlur thing could easily be just a single iPhone app.

I have kind of a soft spot for Motorola because I used a lot of G3 and G4 Macs back in the day, but the CLIQ is just outrageously wrong-headed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s amazing with the branding is they are equating &#8220;click&#8221; with Web, but we&#8217;re already almost 3 years into the tappable Web, the touch screen pocket Web, which Motorola is not involved in at all. FAIL. This is 2005&#8242;s entry into the smartphone market, it&#8217;s not even close to what is needed for 2010. Why would anyone turn down a $99 iPhone for the CLIQ? I can&#8217;t come up with a single reason. And the MotoBlur thing could easily be just a single iPhone app.</p>
<p>I have kind of a soft spot for Motorola because I used a lot of G3 and G4 Macs back in the day, but the CLIQ is just outrageously wrong-headed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harrison</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090911/cliq-reacts/comment-page-1/#comment-13749</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=24568#comment-13749</guid>
		<description>all of these &#039;analysts&#039; couched their comments with &quot;step in right direction&quot; garbage...

none of them said the truth:

motorola has given up its software operating system to google in a last ditch effort to compete with iphone...and google&#039;s android isn&#039;t ready for prime time and perhaps never will be. Anyone using Orkut today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all of these &#8216;analysts&#8217; couched their comments with &#8220;step in right direction&#8221; garbage&#8230;</p>
<p>none of them said the truth:</p>
<p>motorola has given up its software operating system to google in a last ditch effort to compete with iphone&#8230;and google&#8217;s android isn&#8217;t ready for prime time and perhaps never will be. Anyone using Orkut today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paczkowski</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090911/cliq-reacts/comment-page-1/#comment-13748</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=24568#comment-13748</guid>
		<description>There are rumors circulating that T-Mobile may offer it for free to new subscribers, or $399.99 otherwise.  I&#039;ve not been able to confirm, though.

http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/10/motorola-cliq-listed-for-free-on-contract-at-t-mobile-400-stra/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are rumors circulating that T-Mobile may offer it for free to new subscribers, or $399.99 otherwise.  I&#8217;ve not been able to confirm, though.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/10/motorola-cliq-listed-for-free-on-contract-at-t-mobile-400-stra/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2009/0.....-400-stra/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Insert Lame &#34;New Moto Phone CLIQs With Investors&#34; Pun Here [Digital Daily]</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090911/cliq-reacts/comment-page-1/#comment-13745</link>
		<dc:creator>TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Insert Lame &#34;New Moto Phone CLIQs With Investors&#34; Pun Here [Digital Daily]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=24568#comment-13745</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post: Insert Lame &quot;New Moto Phone CLIQs With Investors&quot; Pun Here [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post: Insert Lame &quot;New Moto Phone CLIQs With Investors&quot; Pun Here [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Jackson</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090911/cliq-reacts/comment-page-1/#comment-13744</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=24568#comment-13744</guid>
		<description>as an owner of mot stock, i&#039;m hoping for the best, but the phone is no impressive at all.  im curious at to the price point on these phones because its hard to imagine that customers will shell out more than $100 for this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as an owner of mot stock, i&#8217;m hoping for the best, but the phone is no impressive at all.  im curious at to the price point on these phones because its hard to imagine that customers will shell out more than $100 for this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

