<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Archive Announces Everybody-Against-Google Coalition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090821/internet-archive-announces-everybody-against-google-coalition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090821/internet-archive-announces-everybody-against-google-coalition/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Whiz Underground &#187; Open Book Alliance Throws Book at Google</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090821/internet-archive-announces-everybody-against-google-coalition/comment-page-1/#comment-12844</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Whiz Underground &#187; Open Book Alliance Throws Book at Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=23424#comment-12844</guid>
		<description>[...] The Open Book Alliance&#8211;or &#8220;Sour Grapes Alliance,&#8221; as Google likes to call it&#8211;formally launched Wednesday afternoon, debuting a new Web site, as well as the manifesto with which it is challenging Google’s settlement with authors and publishers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Open Book Alliance&#8211;or &#8220;Sour Grapes Alliance,&#8221; as Google likes to call it&#8211;formally launched Wednesday afternoon, debuting a new Web site, as well as the manifesto with which it is challenging Google’s settlement with authors and publishers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Book Alliance Throws Book at Google [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090821/internet-archive-announces-everybody-against-google-coalition/comment-page-1/#comment-12827</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Book Alliance Throws Book at Google [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=23424#comment-12827</guid>
		<description>[...] launched Wednesday afternoon, debuting a new Web site, as well as the manifesto with which it is challenging Google’s settlement with authors and publishers.    &#8220;The mass digitization of books promises to bring tremendous value to consumers, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] launched Wednesday afternoon, debuting a new Web site, as well as the manifesto with which it is challenging Google’s settlement with authors and publishers.    &#8220;The mass digitization of books promises to bring tremendous value to consumers, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Book Alliance Throws Book at Google [Digital Daily] &#124; TECHNICK</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090821/internet-archive-announces-everybody-against-google-coalition/comment-page-1/#comment-12808</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Book Alliance Throws Book at Google [Digital Daily] &#124; TECHNICK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=23424#comment-12808</guid>
		<description>[...] launched Wednesday afternoon, debuting a new Web site as well as the manifesto with which it is challenging Google’s settlement with authors and publishers. “The mass digitization of books promises to bring tremendous value to consumers, libraries, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] launched Wednesday afternoon, debuting a new Web site as well as the manifesto with which it is challenging Google’s settlement with authors and publishers. “The mass digitization of books promises to bring tremendous value to consumers, libraries, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Book Alliance Throws Book at Google &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090821/internet-archive-announces-everybody-against-google-coalition/comment-page-1/#comment-12802</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Book Alliance Throws Book at Google &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=23424#comment-12802</guid>
		<description>[...] launched Wednesday afternoon, debuting a new Web site as well as the manifesto with which it is challenging Google’s settlement with authors and publishers. “The mass digitization of books promises to bring tremendous value to consumers, libraries, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] launched Wednesday afternoon, debuting a new Web site as well as the manifesto with which it is challenging Google’s settlement with authors and publishers. “The mass digitization of books promises to bring tremendous value to consumers, libraries, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google und die Bücher</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090821/internet-archive-announces-everybody-against-google-coalition/comment-page-1/#comment-12651</link>
		<dc:creator>Google und die Bücher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=23424#comment-12651</guid>
		<description>[...] Stellung, da dieses in der Form nicht korrekt sei. Schlie&#223;lich handele es sich um keinen exklusiven Deal zwischen den Verlagen, den Bibliotheken und Google. Andere Unternehmen k&#246;nnen parallel zu dem [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stellung, da dieses in der Form nicht korrekt sei. Schlie&#223;lich handele es sich um keinen exklusiven Deal zwischen den Verlagen, den Bibliotheken und Google. Andere Unternehmen k&#246;nnen parallel zu dem [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Update, 8.22.09–The Musical Chairs Edition [Digital Daily]</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090821/internet-archive-announces-everybody-against-google-coalition/comment-page-1/#comment-12640</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Update, 8.22.09–The Musical Chairs Edition [Digital Daily]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=23424#comment-12640</guid>
		<description>[...] It might be a little bit occupied by the Open Book Alliance and that group’s opposition to its Google Book Search Settlement, the $125 million deal that will allow it to digitize and monetize some 18 million books. Probably [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It might be a little bit occupied by the Open Book Alliance and that group’s opposition to its Google Book Search Settlement, the $125 million deal that will allow it to digitize and monetize some 18 million books. Probably [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FateMaster Tech News &#187; Weekend Update, 8.22.09–The Musical Chairs Edition [Digital Daily]</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090821/internet-archive-announces-everybody-against-google-coalition/comment-page-1/#comment-12633</link>
		<dc:creator>FateMaster Tech News &#187; Weekend Update, 8.22.09–The Musical Chairs Edition [Digital Daily]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 04:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=23424#comment-12633</guid>
		<description>[...] It might be a little bit occupied by the Open Book Alliance and that group’s opposition to its Google Book Search Settlement, the $125 million deal that will allow it to digitize and monetize some 18 million books. Probably [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It might be a little bit occupied by the Open Book Alliance and that group’s opposition to its Google Book Search Settlement, the $125 million deal that will allow it to digitize and monetize some 18 million books. Probably [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Update, 8.22.09–The Musical Chairs Edition [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090821/internet-archive-announces-everybody-against-google-coalition/comment-page-1/#comment-12619</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Update, 8.22.09–The Musical Chairs Edition [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=23424#comment-12619</guid>
		<description>[...] It might be a little bit occupied by the Open Book Alliance and that group’s opposition to its Google Book Search Settlement, the $125 million deal that will allow it to digitize and monetize some 18 million books. Probably [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It might be a little bit occupied by the Open Book Alliance and that group’s opposition to its Google Book Search Settlement, the $125 million deal that will allow it to digitize and monetize some 18 million books. Probably [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Beach</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090821/internet-archive-announces-everybody-against-google-coalition/comment-page-1/#comment-12562</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=23424#comment-12562</guid>
		<description>&quot;Out of print&quot; is an anachronism, and needs to be made more so.

Like the rotting celluloid tapes in Hollywood vaults we are at a critical crossover point where this stuff either gets scanned, or becomes unavailable to anyone.

At this point anyone who doesn&#039;t like Google&#039;s approach should be challenged to provide a viable alternative.  

Microsoft already dipped their toe in the water and then ran home to mommy, Yahoo has done nothing that I recall, and the Internet Archive, Project Gutenberg, etc. are all well meaning projects, but moving at a glacial pace.

Surely no one thinks that Amazon&#039;s motives are pure.  So far all they have done was purchase Mobipocket in order to put their efforts to a halt.

I read the linked articles and found mentions of objections, but no details on what the actual objections were.  Isn&#039;t the worst that can happen that someone who&#039;s work still has commercial value but it out of print might be made aware of the fact?  They are getting nothing now, but could be getting something in the future.  Sounds like a win-win to me!

Meanwhile a few people with interests in philanthropy (and the ego boost that goes along with it) are being surpassed by a (gasp) organization with commercial interests.

Sounds like sour grapes to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Out of print&#8221; is an anachronism, and needs to be made more so.</p>
<p>Like the rotting celluloid tapes in Hollywood vaults we are at a critical crossover point where this stuff either gets scanned, or becomes unavailable to anyone.</p>
<p>At this point anyone who doesn&#8217;t like Google&#8217;s approach should be challenged to provide a viable alternative.  </p>
<p>Microsoft already dipped their toe in the water and then ran home to mommy, Yahoo has done nothing that I recall, and the Internet Archive, Project Gutenberg, etc. are all well meaning projects, but moving at a glacial pace.</p>
<p>Surely no one thinks that Amazon&#8217;s motives are pure.  So far all they have done was purchase Mobipocket in order to put their efforts to a halt.</p>
<p>I read the linked articles and found mentions of objections, but no details on what the actual objections were.  Isn&#8217;t the worst that can happen that someone who&#8217;s work still has commercial value but it out of print might be made aware of the fact?  They are getting nothing now, but could be getting something in the future.  Sounds like a win-win to me!</p>
<p>Meanwhile a few people with interests in philanthropy (and the ego boost that goes along with it) are being surpassed by a (gasp) organization with commercial interests.</p>
<p>Sounds like sour grapes to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Internet Archive Announces Everybody-Against-Google Coalition [Digital Daily]</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090821/internet-archive-announces-everybody-against-google-coalition/comment-page-1/#comment-12546</link>
		<dc:creator>TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Internet Archive Announces Everybody-Against-Google Coalition [Digital Daily]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=23424#comment-12546</guid>
		<description>[...] here: Internet Archive Announces Everybody-Against-Google Coalition [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here: Internet Archive Announces Everybody-Against-Google Coalition [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Archive Announces Everybody-Against-Google Coalition [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090821/internet-archive-announces-everybody-against-google-coalition/comment-page-1/#comment-12543</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Archive Announces Everybody-Against-Google Coalition [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=23424#comment-12543</guid>
		<description>[...] Article   Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Article   Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

