<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Warner Earnings: The Hangover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090729/time-warner-earnings-the-hangover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090729/time-warner-earnings-the-hangover/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:20:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cash Prizes &#187; With uncertain future, Bebo gets a new president</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090729/time-warner-earnings-the-hangover/comment-page-1/#comment-28485</link>
		<dc:creator>Cash Prizes &#187; With uncertain future, Bebo gets a new president</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22362#comment-28485</guid>
		<description>[...] Time Warner: &#8220;Am I Missing a Tooth?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Time Warner: &#8220;Am I Missing a Tooth?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech News &#187; Nintendo comes down to earth as sales and profits plummet in June quarter</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090729/time-warner-earnings-the-hangover/comment-page-1/#comment-11307</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech News &#187; Nintendo comes down to earth as sales and profits plummet in June quarter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22362#comment-11307</guid>
		<description>[...] Time Warner: &#8220;Am I Missing a Tooth?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Time Warner: &#8220;Am I Missing a Tooth?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time Warner Earnings: The Hangover [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090729/time-warner-earnings-the-hangover/comment-page-1/#comment-11261</link>
		<dc:creator>Time Warner Earnings: The Hangover [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22362#comment-11261</guid>
		<description>[...] Article   Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Article   Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Spitzer</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090729/time-warner-earnings-the-hangover/comment-page-1/#comment-11254</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Spitzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22362#comment-11254</guid>
		<description>Armstrong&#039;s biggest problem is really the subscription access revenue. To be down almost 30% is nothing short of a disaster he has no solution for or can slow or prevent.

That sub revenue picture is a snapshot of how customers are voting on AOL&#039;s value to them. 

Apparently not even worth the $10.00 they pay each month.

Anyone remember just three years back when AOL had around 14M subs and monthly rates were north of $20? 

AOL claims that the subscription business is &quot;low cost&quot;, meaning the operational critical mass for profitability is low. With the huge churn rate, that low cost aspect has about three months left before it starts running negative numbers. 

I&#039;ve commented before that Tim can flog, fire and replace AOL sales people, hire his no-experience in display ads and content buddies from Google and it will still not be possible to close the gap between ad revenue and the subscription access business. 

All this spin about spinning AOL off in November to unlock greater value is total fantasy. TWX and  Bewkes have been trying to sell AOL for the past four years, without any takers! November, at this rate of decline will not be a spin off of AOL, it will become a yard sale. 

As smart as Armstrong may think he and his Imported Google Cronies are, there is no way their algorithms and automating of AOL sales will stop the slide AOL is in. 

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Armstrong&#8217;s biggest problem is really the subscription access revenue. To be down almost 30% is nothing short of a disaster he has no solution for or can slow or prevent.</p>
<p>That sub revenue picture is a snapshot of how customers are voting on AOL&#8217;s value to them. </p>
<p>Apparently not even worth the $10.00 they pay each month.</p>
<p>Anyone remember just three years back when AOL had around 14M subs and monthly rates were north of $20? </p>
<p>AOL claims that the subscription business is &#8220;low cost&#8221;, meaning the operational critical mass for profitability is low. With the huge churn rate, that low cost aspect has about three months left before it starts running negative numbers. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve commented before that Tim can flog, fire and replace AOL sales people, hire his no-experience in display ads and content buddies from Google and it will still not be possible to close the gap between ad revenue and the subscription access business. </p>
<p>All this spin about spinning AOL off in November to unlock greater value is total fantasy. TWX and  Bewkes have been trying to sell AOL for the past four years, without any takers! November, at this rate of decline will not be a spin off of AOL, it will become a yard sale. </p>
<p>As smart as Armstrong may think he and his Imported Google Cronies are, there is no way their algorithms and automating of AOL sales will stop the slide AOL is in. </p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time Warner: “Am I Missing a Tooth?” [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090729/time-warner-earnings-the-hangover/comment-page-1/#comment-11251</link>
		<dc:creator>Time Warner: “Am I Missing a Tooth?” [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22362#comment-11251</guid>
		<description>[...] Article   Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Article   Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Time Warner: “Am I Missing a Tooth?” [Digital Daily]</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090729/time-warner-earnings-the-hangover/comment-page-1/#comment-11249</link>
		<dc:creator>TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Time Warner: “Am I Missing a Tooth?” [Digital Daily]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22362#comment-11249</guid>
		<description>[...] post: Time Warner: “Am I Missing a Tooth?” [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post: Time Warner: “Am I Missing a Tooth?” [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

