<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Worries, Sergey. We Can Make It Back in a Week on Mesothelioma Ads.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who is Hahleq? : Items I found interesting on July 31st through August 1st</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11470</link>
		<dc:creator>Who is Hahleq? : Items I found interesting on July 31st through August 1st</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 03:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22229#comment-11470</guid>
		<description>[...] No Worries, Sergey. We Can Make It Back in a Week on Mesothelioma Ads. &#8211; Yahoo about to follow suit? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No Worries, Sergey. We Can Make It Back in a Week on Mesothelioma Ads. &#8211; Yahoo about to follow suit? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google sells AOL stake after writing down more than $700 million &#124; TECHGADGETSWORLD.NET</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11295</link>
		<dc:creator>Google sells AOL stake after writing down more than $700 million &#124; TECHGADGETSWORLD.NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22229#comment-11295</guid>
		<description>[...] You&#8217;ve Got Fail &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You&#8217;ve Got Fail &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Barnes</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11180</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22229#comment-11180</guid>
		<description>@Mac,

&quot;If I were Google I would consider them a reasonable purchase.&quot;

Reasonable = $100M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mac,</p>
<p>&#8220;If I were Google I would consider them a reasonable purchase.&#8221;</p>
<p>Reasonable = $100M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FateMaster Tech News &#187; Google’s Investment In AOL, Almost A Wash</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11173</link>
		<dc:creator>FateMaster Tech News &#187; Google’s Investment In AOL, Almost A Wash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22229#comment-11173</guid>
		<description>[...] You&#8217;ve Got Fail &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You&#8217;ve Got Fail &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Tim: Here’s a Tour of the It-Takes-a-Licking-and-Keeps-on-Ticking AOL Brand [BoomTown] &#124; UpOff.com</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11164</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Tim: Here’s a Tour of the It-Takes-a-Licking-and-Keeps-on-Ticking AOL Brand [BoomTown] &#124; UpOff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22229#comment-11164</guid>
		<description>[...] with Google (GOOG) selling back its five percent stake in AOL, AOL&#8217;s value has plummeted to about $6 billion. Time Warner is currently worth just over $33 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with Google (GOOG) selling back its five percent stake in AOL, AOL&#8217;s value has plummeted to about $6 billion. Time Warner is currently worth just over $33 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Tim: Here&#8217;s a Tour of the It-Takes-a-Licking-and-Keeps-on-Ticking AOL Brand &#124; Kara Swisher &#124; BoomTown &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11163</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Tim: Here&#8217;s a Tour of the It-Takes-a-Licking-and-Keeps-on-Ticking AOL Brand &#124; Kara Swisher &#124; BoomTown &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22229#comment-11163</guid>
		<description>[...] No Worries, Sergey. We Can Make It Back in a Week on Mesothelioma Ads. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No Worries, Sergey. We Can Make It Back in a Week on Mesothelioma Ads. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech News &#187; Is AT&#38;T behind the rejection and removal of Google Voice apps?</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11161</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech News &#187; Is AT&#38;T behind the rejection and removal of Google Voice apps?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22229#comment-11161</guid>
		<description>[...] You&#8217;ve Got Fail &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You&#8217;ve Got Fail &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tech Town &#187; Is AT&#38;T behind the rejection and removal of Google Voice apps?</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11158</link>
		<dc:creator>The Tech Town &#187; Is AT&#38;T behind the rejection and removal of Google Voice apps?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22229#comment-11158</guid>
		<description>[...] You&#8217;ve Got Fail &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You&#8217;ve Got Fail &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Beach</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11156</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22229#comment-11156</guid>
		<description>I always thought that deal was a charity case to prop up a friendly competitor rather than a true investment.

Of course corporations aren&#039;t supposed to do such things, but there really hasn&#039;t been an reasonable alternate explanation (make it up in volume?)

AOL e-mail is actually pretty good in my opinion.  In terms of functionality it surpasses any but Gmail and they have never engaged in the style of lock-in that Yahoo and Microsoft do (&quot;pay us and we&#039;ll filter spam!&quot;).  AIM and the Google equivalent already work well together and there are still a lot of AIM users out there.  Worth something.

If I were Google I would consider them a reasonable purchase.  They have a lot of dial-up users who don&#039;t have many options, and what is better for dial-up users than Google&#039;s light weight interfaces.

I&#039;ve always thought Google could merge in the AOL infrastructure pretty easily, while at the same time Microsoft could take Yahoo and grind it into a fine blue powder, chasing its users elsewhere in the process.

There is still a lot of consolidation that could (and probably will) happen once more people reach &quot;capitulation&quot; on this whole econolypse thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought that deal was a charity case to prop up a friendly competitor rather than a true investment.</p>
<p>Of course corporations aren&#8217;t supposed to do such things, but there really hasn&#8217;t been an reasonable alternate explanation (make it up in volume?)</p>
<p>AOL e-mail is actually pretty good in my opinion.  In terms of functionality it surpasses any but Gmail and they have never engaged in the style of lock-in that Yahoo and Microsoft do (&#8220;pay us and we&#8217;ll filter spam!&#8221;).  AIM and the Google equivalent already work well together and there are still a lot of AIM users out there.  Worth something.</p>
<p>If I were Google I would consider them a reasonable purchase.  They have a lot of dial-up users who don&#8217;t have many options, and what is better for dial-up users than Google&#8217;s light weight interfaces.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always thought Google could merge in the AOL infrastructure pretty easily, while at the same time Microsoft could take Yahoo and grind it into a fine blue powder, chasing its users elsewhere in the process.</p>
<p>There is still a lot of consolidation that could (and probably will) happen once more people reach &#8220;capitulation&#8221; on this whole econolypse thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech News &#187; OpenSports Closes Round; FoxSports&#8217; 20 Percent Stake Priced At $6 Million</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11145</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech News &#187; OpenSports Closes Round; FoxSports&#8217; 20 Percent Stake Priced At $6 Million</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22229#comment-11145</guid>
		<description>[...] You&#8217;ve Got Fail &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You&#8217;ve Got Fail &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Worries, Sergey. We Can Make it Back in a Week on Mesothelioma Ads [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11130</link>
		<dc:creator>No Worries, Sergey. We Can Make it Back in a Week on Mesothelioma Ads [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22229#comment-11130</guid>
		<description>[...] Article   Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Article   Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Spitzer</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11125</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Spitzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22229#comment-11125</guid>
		<description>How&#039;s this for a vote of confidence in AOL&#039;s new management team from their former employers?

OUCH!!!

Sell now before the value declines even more? 

You betcha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;s this for a vote of confidence in AOL&#8217;s new management team from their former employers?</p>
<p>OUCH!!!</p>
<p>Sell now before the value declines even more? </p>
<p>You betcha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You’ve Got Fail … [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11124</link>
		<dc:creator>You’ve Got Fail … [Digital Daily] &#124; UpOff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22229#comment-11124</guid>
		<description>[...] Armstrong best hope he&#8217;s able to renew that partnership when it expires at the end of 2010.   Article   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Armstrong best hope he&#8217;s able to renew that partnership when it expires at the end of 2010.   Article   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; You’ve Got Fail … [Digital Daily]</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090727/google-got-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-11123</link>
		<dc:creator>TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; You’ve Got Fail … [Digital Daily]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22229#comment-11123</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest here: You’ve Got Fail … [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest here: You’ve Got Fail … [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

