<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple to Flip Off Cisco With New iPods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090723/apple-to-flip-off-cisco-with-new-ipods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090723/apple-to-flip-off-cisco-with-new-ipods/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:20:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple to Flip Off Cisco With New iPods [Digital Daily]</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090723/apple-to-flip-off-cisco-with-new-ipods/comment-page-1/#comment-10971</link>
		<dc:creator>TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple to Flip Off Cisco With New iPods [Digital Daily]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 04:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=21993#comment-10971</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest here: Apple to Flip Off Cisco With New iPods [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest here: Apple to Flip Off Cisco With New iPods [Digital Daily]   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Features of the iPhone 3Gs Part 2</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090723/apple-to-flip-off-cisco-with-new-ipods/comment-page-1/#comment-10785</link>
		<dc:creator>New Features of the iPhone 3Gs Part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=21993#comment-10785</guid>
		<description>[...] with bringing death to the Flip Mino, but apparently that&#8217;s not enough. If Apple turns its iPods into digital camcorders, Cisco Systems can say bye-bye to their recent acquisition of Pure Digital Video, who was formerly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with bringing death to the Flip Mino, but apparently that&#8217;s not enough. If Apple turns its iPods into digital camcorders, Cisco Systems can say bye-bye to their recent acquisition of Pure Digital Video, who was formerly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Barnes</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090723/apple-to-flip-off-cisco-with-new-ipods/comment-page-1/#comment-10754</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=21993#comment-10754</guid>
		<description>Anecdotal evidence of the &quot;one device&quot; theory.

Our family owns 4 cameras.
1. Canon 300D with $1500 worth of lenses.
2. Canon Powershot A570.
3. iPhone 3G
4. Samsung A650 phone

Only one of these cameras is used a lot. The iPhone of course.

The 300D is just too big to cart around.
The PowerShot takes much better photos than the iPhone, but it is larger than the iPhone.
The Samsung is never used because it costs money to get the photos from the camera to my computer and because I would have to re-read the instruction book.

The iPhone&#039;s picture quality is: good enough.
The iPhone is small enough to carry all the time.
Transferring photos to the computer is trivial both in time and money.

In the medium run (2-4 years) all low/lower-end cameras (still and video), navigation devices, music players, audio recorders will be replaced by the iPhone and its rivals.

Only Moleskine will survive the onslaught.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anecdotal evidence of the &#8220;one device&#8221; theory.</p>
<p>Our family owns 4 cameras.<br />
1. Canon 300D with $1500 worth of lenses.<br />
2. Canon Powershot A570.<br />
3. iPhone 3G<br />
4. Samsung A650 phone</p>
<p>Only one of these cameras is used a lot. The iPhone of course.</p>
<p>The 300D is just too big to cart around.<br />
The PowerShot takes much better photos than the iPhone, but it is larger than the iPhone.<br />
The Samsung is never used because it costs money to get the photos from the camera to my computer and because I would have to re-read the instruction book.</p>
<p>The iPhone&#8217;s picture quality is: good enough.<br />
The iPhone is small enough to carry all the time.<br />
Transferring photos to the computer is trivial both in time and money.</p>
<p>In the medium run (2-4 years) all low/lower-end cameras (still and video), navigation devices, music players, audio recorders will be replaced by the iPhone and its rivals.</p>
<p>Only Moleskine will survive the onslaught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

