Palm Valuation Not All It’s Cracked Up to Be
With Palm’s shares up more than 900 percent since January, two things are clear: Palm’s Pre and webOS operating system are nothing short of a triumph and the run-up in Palm (PALM) shares is most likely a wee bit overdone.
In a research note issued Monday, Jesup and Lamont analyst Kevin Dede says as much, arguing that the company’s shares are overvalued, particularly in light of Pre returns.
“We stood just as the Street now stands, completely enamored with Palm’s highly innovative new device; however, our checks now lead us to believe that while initial sales could almost be categorized as ‘gangbusters’ and perhaps above initial assumptions, we think there are engineering complications that are driving a higher level of returned devices than otherwise expected.
“From a hardware perspective,” Dede continues, “the Pre includes the features expected in a cutting-edge smartphone, including a large touch screen, one of the most powerful processors designed for a handset, and a slide-out keyboard; we understand that a great many returns are on account of an unsatisfactory experience with the keyboard operation and dead pixels in the screen. Fixing these issues shouldn’t pose a problem, but we think the timing risk and severity should be reflected in the shares.”
Dede notes that his impromptu survey of local retail outlets–Sprint (S), Best Buy (BBY) and Radio Shack–revealed that about one in three devices is being returned. He cites, as well, a survey on Pre Central that suggests roughly 40 percent of initial Pre sales are exchanged.
Now, to be fair, this is anecdotal evidence at best. The Pre Central survey, which at present has only 615 respondents, is hardly statistically relevant. That said, Pre Central is a top Pre fan site, and Palm’s own forum has quite a few complaints, as does SprintUsers. So clearly, something’s going on here.
Reached for comment on the issue, Palm had this to say: “We think the Palm Pre is the best product we’ve ever shipped. While we haven’t seen anything out of the ordinary we will continue to closely monitor both Palm and Sprint customer service channels.”
Despite concerns about the Pre’s build quality and Dede’s contention that the company’s stock is overvalued, the analyst sees good things ahead for Palm. “In light of the overwhelming evidence supporting continued growth of converged devices, we believe Palm addresses the most enchanting segment of the mobile device market and should experience at least market growth over the longer term.
“Shorter term is obviously more interesting, and we believe Palm’s technology positions it to gain share at the expense of those companies offering less attractive, less functional devices,” Dede adds, concluding, “The competitive technology race boils down to ease of use across an increasingly complex technical environment.”
UPDATE: Concerned that its survey has been taken out of context, Pre Central is running another poll on Pre build quality, this one on its blog, rather than its forums. And while it’s no more statistically relevant than the original, it’s worth noting. Because with more than twice the number of respondents, it shows just 18 percent of initial Pre sales being exchanged.





Comments
Like “gangbusters”? As in selling 1/5th of the number of iPhone 3GS’s in the first weekend each was available? The iPhone said by many to be merely a “minor” upgrade?
What happened to the millions of people whose AT&T contracts were expiring, and would jump ship to the Pre? All no-shows.
Given the lack of sales, build and battery life issues, the high number of defects and returns, and the fact that the number of apps in the store is still best measured in the dozens, the only thing amazing about the Pre is the amount of press Palm has managed to garner.
Ah well, on to the HTC Hero and the next iPhone killer…
Posted by Michael Long at July 20th, 2009 at 1:20 pmThe majority of Pre and Blackberry devices are paid for by employers. iPhone is retail. Although Blackberry has made inroads in retail. It’s not about quantity of Apps, it’s about the quality of the Apps. Can I do business with a little fun as opposed to just fun.
Posted by Jeff Stevens at July 21st, 2009 at 4:45 amI don’t know why you can’t find stats that show that. Maybe your not trying hard enough.
@Michael Long:
Comparing the sales of the Pre to iPhone 3G sales makes little, if any, sense. There was never any chance that the Pre’s sales would match the iPhone 3G’s sales. That’s a completely artificial expectation, given that the iPhone 3G was the successor to the massively popular original iPhone. The Pre, in contrast, is a brand new product, with no legacy behind it. Not to mention the fact that the Pre had nothing even close to the ad blitz that was behind the iPhone 3G (or even the original iPhone). Comparing the Pre to the original iPhone would probably make more sense, but even there, comparing apples to apples is difficult, because Palm is in a very different financial position than Apple was when they released the iPhone.
The lack of apps (relative to the iPhone) is similarly unsurprising, given the fact that the iPhone App Store has had such a long head start. But with the release of the SDK, the number of Pre apps should increase rapidly. (At least, it should increase rapidly in the homebrew arena. There’s no telling how long it’ll take the App Catolog to introduce new apps. The barrier to getting the App Catalog fully up and running seems to be the question of just what form compiled apps are going to take on the Pre. At present, the apps are all on the Pre in plain text form, which isn’t going to be acceptable once people start selling their wares. And of course, there’s still the issue of native access to the hardware that has to be worked out. (I actually see this as a relatively small problem, considering the Linux underpinnings of WebOS. There are plenty of mature programming languages that can be used to access the hardware.)
Posted by Brian Hartman at July 21st, 2009 at 7:38 am