<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google and the Evolution of Search III: What's Next in Search? Much, Much Better Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090605/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-iii-whats-next-in-search-much-much-better-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090605/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-iii-whats-next-in-search-much-much-better-search/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:28:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The &#8216;Web Squared&#8217; Era &#171; brady ambler: all about digital</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090605/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-iii-whats-next-in-search-much-much-better-search/comment-page-1/#comment-14743</link>
		<dc:creator>The &#8216;Web Squared&#8217; Era &#171; brady ambler: all about digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=18756#comment-14743</guid>
		<description>[...] such applications, intelligent algorithms matter: Google&#8217;s PageRank algorithm famously sees every link to a Web site as a vote. Similarly WalMart understands that every purchase [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] such applications, intelligent algorithms matter: Google&#8217;s PageRank algorithm famously sees every link to a Web site as a vote. Similarly WalMart understands that every purchase [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Web à la puissance 2 : le Web 2.0 cinq ans plus tard &#124; traffic-internet.net</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090605/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-iii-whats-next-in-search-much-much-better-search/comment-page-1/#comment-13496</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Web à la puissance 2 : le Web 2.0 cinq ans plus tard &#124; traffic-internet.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=18756#comment-13496</guid>
		<description>[...] élément d&#8217;une page spécifique de résultats de recherche plus souvent que le premier, l&#8217;algorithme de Google interprète ceci comme un signal indiquant que le cinquième résultat est potentiellement meilleur [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] élément d&#8217;une page spécifique de résultats de recherche plus souvent que le premier, l&#8217;algorithme de Google interprète ceci comme un signal indiquant que le cinquième résultat est potentiellement meilleur [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Beautiful Nuggets From Web 2.0 Summit White Paper &#171; I, Geek</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090605/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-iii-whats-next-in-search-much-much-better-search/comment-page-1/#comment-10084</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Beautiful Nuggets From Web 2.0 Summit White Paper &#171; I, Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 05:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=18756#comment-10084</guid>
		<description>[...] start clicking on the fifth item on a particular search results page more often than the first, Google’s algorithms take this as a signal that the fifth result may well be better than the first, and eventually [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] start clicking on the fifth item on a particular search results page more often than the first, Google’s algorithms take this as a signal that the fifth result may well be better than the first, and eventually [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Squared: Web 2.0 Five Years On: Web 2.0 Summit 2009 &#8211; Co-produced by TechWeb &#38; O&#8217;Reilly Conferences, October 20 &#8211; 22, 2009, San Francisco, CA &#171; Soniq.org Links Blog</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090605/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-iii-whats-next-in-search-much-much-better-search/comment-page-1/#comment-9799</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Squared: Web 2.0 Five Years On: Web 2.0 Summit 2009 &#8211; Co-produced by TechWeb &#38; O&#8217;Reilly Conferences, October 20 &#8211; 22, 2009, San Francisco, CA &#171; Soniq.org Links Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=18756#comment-9799</guid>
		<description>[...] start clicking on the fifth item on a particular search results page more often than the first, Google’s algorithms take this as a signal that the fifth result may well be better than the first, and eventually [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] start clicking on the fifth item on a particular search results page more often than the first, Google’s algorithms take this as a signal that the fifth result may well be better than the first, and eventually [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google and the Evolution of Search III: What’s Next in Search? Much, Much Better Search &#124; TechTwist</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090605/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-iii-whats-next-in-search-much-much-better-search/comment-page-1/#comment-8280</link>
		<dc:creator>Google and the Evolution of Search III: What’s Next in Search? Much, Much Better Search &#124; TechTwist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=18756#comment-8280</guid>
		<description>[...] more from the original source: Google and the Evolution of Search III: What’s Next in Search? Much, Much Better Search   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more from the original source: Google and the Evolution of Search III: What’s Next in Search? Much, Much Better Search   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090605/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-iii-whats-next-in-search-much-much-better-search/comment-page-1/#comment-8269</link>
		<dc:creator>What</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 04:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=18756#comment-8269</guid>
		<description>[...] Next in Search? Much, Much Better Search             Read Full Article   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next in Search? Much, Much Better Search             Read Full Article   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Welch</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090605/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-iii-whats-next-in-search-much-much-better-search/comment-page-1/#comment-8234</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=18756#comment-8234</guid>
		<description>I understand why they have to include advertisers in the search, even when we&#039;re not actually looking to buy something. How bout a switch that we can set that says, &quot;I&#039;m not shopping,&quot; so the advertisers are more sidelined than when we are shopping for something. Make it opt-in to narrow searches down in such a manner.

How&#039;s that for relevance, and not forcing advertisers to pay for hits that have no real value for them? Or is this a game where Google doesn&#039;t really optimize their searches for relevance because it increases their revenue to not do so?

And how about letting us selectively block advertisers we know are not legitimate so their results don&#039;t pop up at the top of the list?

And really, with a motto of &quot;do no evil&quot; do you really think it&#039;s legit. to take money to put competitors to the companies we&#039;re looking for above said companies?

Here&#039;s hoping Bing makes Google do better, faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand why they have to include advertisers in the search, even when we&#8217;re not actually looking to buy something. How bout a switch that we can set that says, &#8220;I&#8217;m not shopping,&#8221; so the advertisers are more sidelined than when we are shopping for something. Make it opt-in to narrow searches down in such a manner.</p>
<p>How&#8217;s that for relevance, and not forcing advertisers to pay for hits that have no real value for them? Or is this a game where Google doesn&#8217;t really optimize their searches for relevance because it increases their revenue to not do so?</p>
<p>And how about letting us selectively block advertisers we know are not legitimate so their results don&#8217;t pop up at the top of the list?</p>
<p>And really, with a motto of &#8220;do no evil&#8221; do you really think it&#8217;s legit. to take money to put competitors to the companies we&#8217;re looking for above said companies?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s hoping Bing makes Google do better, faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreas ramos</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090605/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-iii-whats-next-in-search-much-much-better-search/comment-page-1/#comment-8233</link>
		<dc:creator>andreas ramos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=18756#comment-8233</guid>
		<description>The Google Quality Raters look at websites and give them scores, based on various criteria. 

For an example of a score sheet, see the blog http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=1398</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Google Quality Raters look at websites and give them scores, based on various criteria. </p>
<p>For an example of a score sheet, see the blog <a href="http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=1398" rel="nofollow">http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=1398</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google and the Evolution of Search II: Cheating the System &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090605/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-iii-whats-next-in-search-much-much-better-search/comment-page-1/#comment-8224</link>
		<dc:creator>Google and the Evolution of Search II: Cheating the System &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=18756#comment-8224</guid>
		<description>[...] III: What&#8217;s Next in Search? Much, Much Better Search &#8212; Google Fellow Amit Singhal     Print  all_things_di220:http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090604/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-ii-cheating-the-system/?reflink=ATD_yahoo_buzz Sharevar obj = SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Google and the Evolution of Search II: Cheating the System&quot;, url: &quot;http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090604/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-ii-cheating-the-system/&quot; },{button:false});var elem = document.getElementById(&quot;share-18668-0.15649700 1244206958&quot;);obj.attachButton(elem); 1 Comment  Tagged: Digital Daily, Google, John Paczkowski, search, Amit Singhal, GOOG, Matt Cutts, Scott Huffman, spam &#124; permalink    Sphere.Inline.search(&quot;&quot;, &quot;http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090604/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-ii-cheating-the-system/&quot;); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] III: What&#8217;s Next in Search? Much, Much Better Search &#8212; Google Fellow Amit Singhal     Print  all_things_di220:http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090604/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-ii-cheating-the-system/?reflink=ATD_yahoo_buzz Sharevar obj = SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &#8220;Google and the Evolution of Search II: Cheating the System&#8221;, url: &#8220;http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090604/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-ii-cheating-the-system/&#8221; },{button:false});var elem = document.getElementById(&#8221;share-18668-0.15649700 1244206958&#8243;);obj.attachButton(elem); 1 Comment  Tagged: Digital Daily, Google, John Paczkowski, search, Amit Singhal, GOOG, Matt Cutts, Scott Huffman, spam | permalink    Sphere.Inline.search(&#8221;", &#8220;http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090604/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-ii-cheating-the-system/&#8221;); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google and the Evolution of Search I: Human Evaluators &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090605/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-iii-whats-next-in-search-much-much-better-search/comment-page-1/#comment-8223</link>
		<dc:creator>Google and the Evolution of Search I: Human Evaluators &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=18756#comment-8223</guid>
		<description>[...] III: What&#8217;s Next in Search? Much, Much Better Search &#8212; Google Fellow Amit Singhal     Print  all_things_di220:http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090603/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-scott-huffman/?reflink=ATD_yahoo_buzz Sharevar obj = SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Google and the Evolution of Search I: Human Evaluators&quot;, url: &quot;http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090603/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-scott-huffman/&quot; },{button:false});var elem = document.getElementById(&quot;share-18596-0.77068500 1244206936&quot;);obj.attachButton(elem); 5 Comments  Tagged: Digital Daily, Google, John Paczkowski, search, algorithm, GOOG, human evaluators, Quality Raters, Scott Huffman, search evaluation &#124; permalink    Sphere.Inline.search(&quot;&quot;, &quot;http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090603/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-scott-huffman/&quot;); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] III: What&#8217;s Next in Search? Much, Much Better Search &#8212; Google Fellow Amit Singhal     Print  all_things_di220:http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090603/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-scott-huffman/?reflink=ATD_yahoo_buzz Sharevar obj = SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &#8220;Google and the Evolution of Search I: Human Evaluators&#8221;, url: &#8220;http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090603/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-scott-huffman/&#8221; },{button:false});var elem = document.getElementById(&#8221;share-18596-0.77068500 1244206936&#8243;);obj.attachButton(elem); 5 Comments  Tagged: Digital Daily, Google, John Paczkowski, search, algorithm, GOOG, human evaluators, Quality Raters, Scott Huffman, search evaluation | permalink    Sphere.Inline.search(&#8221;", &#8220;http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090603/google-and-the-evolution-of-search-scott-huffman/&#8221;); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
