<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EC to Intel: How About Some Chips With That Guacamole?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090511/ec-to-beat-intel-into-guacamole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090511/ec-to-beat-intel-into-guacamole/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:30:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EU Overclocks Intel Antitrust Fine &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090511/ec-to-beat-intel-into-guacamole/comment-page-1/#comment-7159</link>
		<dc:creator>EU Overclocks Intel Antitrust Fine &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 12:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=17330#comment-7159</guid>
		<description>[...] And after all, it could have been worse. $1.45 billion is quite a bit less than the maximum fine the EC could have levied &#8212; 10 percent of a company’s annual revenue. Given that Intel made $37.6 billion in 2008, the EC could have slapped it with penalties of $4 billion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And after all, it could have been worse. $1.45 billion is quite a bit less than the maximum fine the EC could have levied &#8212; 10 percent of a company’s annual revenue. Given that Intel made $37.6 billion in 2008, the EC could have slapped it with penalties of $4 billion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: European Commission Keeps Eye on Google, Goes After Intel, Microsoft &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090511/ec-to-beat-intel-into-guacamole/comment-page-1/#comment-7119</link>
		<dc:creator>European Commission Keeps Eye on Google, Goes After Intel, Microsoft &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=17330#comment-7119</guid>
		<description>[...] and its business practices. Right now the agency has its hands full with Microsoft (MSFT) and Intel (INTC). It does, however, suggest that Google best keep its informal “don’t be evil” motto [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and its business practices. Right now the agency has its hands full with Microsoft (MSFT) and Intel (INTC). It does, however, suggest that Google best keep its informal “don’t be evil” motto [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Beach</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090511/ec-to-beat-intel-into-guacamole/comment-page-1/#comment-7089</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 20:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=17330#comment-7089</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m almost tempted to feel sorry for Intel.  When governments run short of cash, we now have an infinity of laws that can be used to bring in the revenue.

On the other hand there is something JUST WRONG about the fact that Intel controls so much of our computing infrastructure.  With operating systems (at least the ones not vended by Microsoft) able to mask the differences between all manner of hardware (Linux runs on a dozen different platforms from the smallest embedded device to the largest mainframe, and the Apple OS, at least until recently had the potential to do the same).  But whenever software gets to the point where the microprocessor is on the verge of becoming a commodity item, Intel is off making no-audit-trail deal that gets everyone locked in again.

Europe will no-doubt waste the money they extort from Intel, but they may get this country&#039;s technology back on a multi-vendor track that will withstand the eventual emergence of non-American competitors that will use Open Source solutions and true commodity hardware to do to Silicon Valley what they have already done to Detroit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m almost tempted to feel sorry for Intel.  When governments run short of cash, we now have an infinity of laws that can be used to bring in the revenue.</p>
<p>On the other hand there is something JUST WRONG about the fact that Intel controls so much of our computing infrastructure.  With operating systems (at least the ones not vended by Microsoft) able to mask the differences between all manner of hardware (Linux runs on a dozen different platforms from the smallest embedded device to the largest mainframe, and the Apple OS, at least until recently had the potential to do the same).  But whenever software gets to the point where the microprocessor is on the verge of becoming a commodity item, Intel is off making no-audit-trail deal that gets everyone locked in again.</p>
<p>Europe will no-doubt waste the money they extort from Intel, but they may get this country&#8217;s technology back on a multi-vendor track that will withstand the eventual emergence of non-American competitors that will use Open Source solutions and true commodity hardware to do to Silicon Valley what they have already done to Detroit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
