<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verizon: Look Ma! No iPhone!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090427/verizon-look-ma-no-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090427/verizon-look-ma-no-iphone/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Rourke&#8217;s Blog &#187; On My Radar 4/28/09: News Circulation Steep Drop</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090427/verizon-look-ma-no-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-6474</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Rourke&#8217;s Blog &#187; On My Radar 4/28/09: News Circulation Steep Drop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=16447#comment-6474</guid>
		<description>[...] announced good quarterly results yesterday. They earned 63 cents per share, beating analysts&#8217; predictions of 59 cents. It ended the quarter with 86.6 million wireless subscribers. But the big news? In answer to a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] announced good quarterly results yesterday. They earned 63 cents per share, beating analysts&#8217; predictions of 59 cents. It ended the quarter with 86.6 million wireless subscribers. But the big news? In answer to a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Owens</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090427/verizon-look-ma-no-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-6456</link>
		<dc:creator>David Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=16447#comment-6456</guid>
		<description>where I live, ATT works extremely well. I have noticed recent improvements in both Edge and 3G service. In fact, Edge is so fast it rivals the 3G of a year ago. That said, if iPhone goes to Verizon, I will probably switch because the wife has it, and it would be free mobile to mobile.

As an aside, T-Mobile was the worst by far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where I live, ATT works extremely well. I have noticed recent improvements in both Edge and 3G service. In fact, Edge is so fast it rivals the 3G of a year ago. That said, if iPhone goes to Verizon, I will probably switch because the wife has it, and it would be free mobile to mobile.</p>
<p>As an aside, T-Mobile was the worst by far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Beach</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090427/verizon-look-ma-no-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-6453</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=16447#comment-6453</guid>
		<description>Apocryphal I know, but where I live nobody&#039;s network works quite as well as Verizon&#039;s.  Even my Kindle, which I understand uses Sprint often fails to connect.  My cheap pay-by-minute phones which in this area seem to be using AT&amp;T often say &quot;no service&quot;.  These company&#039;s claims of network coverage are a cruel marketing joke for those who don&#039;t get coverage confirmed by a real person, or on-the-spot test.  When I first moved here I had Verizon, and it &quot;just worked&quot;.  Unfortunately for my usage pattern, it was just too expensive and I felt I wasn&#039;t getting enough of a cost break for being an &quot;all-Verizon&quot; customer.  I&#039;m glad to see the economy forcing these companies to give users more bang for the buck... at least some of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apocryphal I know, but where I live nobody&#8217;s network works quite as well as Verizon&#8217;s.  Even my Kindle, which I understand uses Sprint often fails to connect.  My cheap pay-by-minute phones which in this area seem to be using AT&amp;T often say &#8220;no service&#8221;.  These company&#8217;s claims of network coverage are a cruel marketing joke for those who don&#8217;t get coverage confirmed by a real person, or on-the-spot test.  When I first moved here I had Verizon, and it &#8220;just worked&#8221;.  Unfortunately for my usage pattern, it was just too expensive and I felt I wasn&#8217;t getting enough of a cost break for being an &#8220;all-Verizon&#8221; customer.  I&#8217;m glad to see the economy forcing these companies to give users more bang for the buck&#8230; at least some of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Jim Dow 30 &#187; Verizon: Look Ma! No iPhone! (at AllThingsD)</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090427/verizon-look-ma-no-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-6451</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Jim Dow 30 &#187; Verizon: Look Ma! No iPhone! (at AllThingsD)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=16447#comment-6451</guid>
		<description>[...] Verizon may well want to add the iPhone to its mobile device lineup, but it&#8217;s doing perfectly well without it. The company posted earnings this morning that bested analyst estimates thanks to a strong wireless business that continues to compensate for its declining wireline division.  Go to Source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Verizon may well want to add the iPhone to its mobile device lineup, but it&#8217;s doing perfectly well without it. The company posted earnings this morning that bested analyst estimates thanks to a strong wireless business that continues to compensate for its declining wireline division.  Go to Source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

