In this environment where nobody is buying anything and you come out with a kick-ass product, you might get a lot of wows and woos, but that does not convert into sales. So that’s a wasted effort.”
The Tripster is nothing if not consistent, as in consistently wrong. He’s blown so many calls on Apple one wonders if his pronouncements aren’t really coded “buy” signals for the company’s stock.
I guess some analysts don’t actually listen to Apple’s financial meetings then? I mean, Jobs recently pointed (figuratively) to the big pile of cash they have, combined with a lack of debt, and said – as hard economic times approached – that they would “innovate” their way through the downturn.
Maybe we should come up with a new aphorism? People who can do, people who can’t analyze.
To be fair, this is a fairly widely held view given Apple’s lofty margins/pricing/etc., but I have to say that I am through taking seriously so-called experts like Chowdry who make the same macro commentary independent of any specifics about the company.
Cheers,
Mark
–
Getting Real: On Doomsday, the Demise of So-Called Experts and the New Arbitrage
READ ME: http://bit.ly/tjd3
John Paczkowski has been poking fun at the tech industry and the personalities that drive it since 1997. From 1999 to 2007, he wrote the award-winning tech news Web log Good Morning Silicon Valley for the San Jose Mercury News, Silicon Valley's daily newspaper. Read more »
Here is a statement of my ethics and coverage policies. It is more than most of you want to know, but, in the age of suspicion of the media, I am laying it all out.
12:58 AM: Breakfast: Two schools of fish from Tokyo Bay. Calories: 782,000. How I was feeling when I ate this: confused, irradiated, hating my size. 11:37 AM: Exercise: “Taxi Stomp” (alternating legs, for 30 blocks). Calories burned: 148,900,183.
1983. The Beatles announce their first tour in thirteen years, but likewise announce that Michael Jackson will be going on tour with them as a one gigantic mega-concert event.
Comments
The Tripster is nothing if not consistent, as in consistently wrong. He’s blown so many calls on Apple one wonders if his pronouncements aren’t really coded “buy” signals for the company’s stock.
Posted by ross richardson at February 19th, 2009 at 6:23 amI guess some analysts don’t actually listen to Apple’s financial meetings then? I mean, Jobs recently pointed (figuratively) to the big pile of cash they have, combined with a lack of debt, and said – as hard economic times approached – that they would “innovate” their way through the downturn.
Maybe we should come up with a new aphorism? People who can do, people who can’t analyze.
Posted by Eric Welch at February 19th, 2009 at 8:29 amTo be fair, this is a fairly widely held view given Apple’s lofty margins/pricing/etc., but I have to say that I am through taking seriously so-called experts like Chowdry who make the same macro commentary independent of any specifics about the company.
Cheers,
Mark
Posted by Mark Sigal at February 19th, 2009 at 9:42 am–
Getting Real: On Doomsday, the Demise of So-Called Experts and the New Arbitrage
READ ME: http://bit.ly/tjd3