<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Potential Sirius Delisting Postponed Until November</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090128/potential-sirius-delisting-postponed-until-november/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090128/potential-sirius-delisting-postponed-until-november/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:08:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Rayl</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090128/potential-sirius-delisting-postponed-until-november/comment-page-1/#comment-4881</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Rayl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=12080#comment-4881</guid>
		<description>and BTW: Thanks for updating the article. Just saw that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and BTW: Thanks for updating the article. Just saw that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Rayl</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090128/potential-sirius-delisting-postponed-until-november/comment-page-1/#comment-4880</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Rayl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=12080#comment-4880</guid>
		<description>The mention of the possibility would have been nice. The problem with media today is that they tend to scare the crap out of people. 

As far as the NASDAQ issue, perhaps you could have seen it on Siriusbuzz.com, Orbitcast.com, SeekingAlpha.com, Fool.com, or anywhere else that follows satellite radio closely.  They all had it posted the same day or perhaps the day after the ruling came out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mention of the possibility would have been nice. The problem with media today is that they tend to scare the crap out of people. </p>
<p>As far as the NASDAQ issue, perhaps you could have seen it on Siriusbuzz.com, Orbitcast.com, SeekingAlpha.com, Fool.com, or anywhere else that follows satellite radio closely.  They all had it posted the same day or perhaps the day after the ruling came out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paczkowski</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090128/potential-sirius-delisting-postponed-until-november/comment-page-1/#comment-4879</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=12080#comment-4879</guid>
		<description>Point taken, Bryan. The NASDAQ announcement was indeed released in December.

That said, I only noticed it today and &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.google.com/news?um=1&amp;tab=wn&amp;nolr=1&amp;hl=en&amp;q=NASDAQ%2BSirius%2Bdelist&amp;btnG=Search+News&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I haven&#039;t seen a discussion of its implications for Sirius anywhere&lt;/a&gt;, so I felt it worth reporting.

Finally, the post as written is accurate. Unlike the time periods noted in it, extension to which you refer is in no way guaranteed. You admit as much in your comment when you say they&#039;re &quot;granted in 95% of cases.&quot; I have no idea whether that percentage is accurate or not, but it certainly accounts for the possibility of the Nov. date on which the post is based.

Anyway, I&#039;ve updated the article to note your contribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point taken, Bryan. The NASDAQ announcement was indeed released in December.</p>
<p>That said, I only noticed it today and <a href="http://news.google.com/news?um=1&amp;tab=wn&amp;nolr=1&amp;hl=en&amp;q=NASDAQ%2BSirius%2Bdelist&amp;btnG=Search+News" rel="nofollow">I haven&#8217;t seen a discussion of its implications for Sirius anywhere</a>, so I felt it worth reporting.</p>
<p>Finally, the post as written is accurate. Unlike the time periods noted in it, extension to which you refer is in no way guaranteed. You admit as much in your comment when you say they&#8217;re &#8220;granted in 95% of cases.&#8221; I have no idea whether that percentage is accurate or not, but it certainly accounts for the possibility of the Nov. date on which the post is based.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;ve updated the article to note your contribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Rayl</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090128/potential-sirius-delisting-postponed-until-november/comment-page-1/#comment-4878</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Rayl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=12080#comment-4878</guid>
		<description>I love accurate and timely news articles... 

Unfortunately, this is not one of them.

TIMELY: The NASDAQ requirement announcement that YOU linked to is dated December 19th. And you are publishing this article Jan. 28th? Sloppy. 

How about accurate? &quot;Delisting postponed until November&quot;. Not accurate at all. You see, once their first 180 day period runs out, the company can file for an extention, which is granted in 95% of cases. which would give them another 180 days. That pushed delisting potential back until May of 2010. 

The site mus have been despearate for hits or something...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love accurate and timely news articles&#8230; </p>
<p>Unfortunately, this is not one of them.</p>
<p>TIMELY: The NASDAQ requirement announcement that YOU linked to is dated December 19th. And you are publishing this article Jan. 28th? Sloppy. </p>
<p>How about accurate? &#8220;Delisting postponed until November&#8221;. Not accurate at all. You see, once their first 180 day period runs out, the company can file for an extention, which is granted in 95% of cases. which would give them another 180 days. That pushed delisting potential back until May of 2010. </p>
<p>The site mus have been despearate for hits or something&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potential Sirius Delisting Postponed Until November [Digital Daily] &#124; heave-ho.org</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090128/potential-sirius-delisting-postponed-until-november/comment-page-1/#comment-4875</link>
		<dc:creator>Potential Sirius Delisting Postponed Until November [Digital Daily] &#124; heave-ho.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=12080#comment-4875</guid>
		<description>[...] Continued here: Potential Sirius Delisting Postponed Until November [Digital Daily] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continued here: Potential Sirius Delisting Postponed Until November [Digital Daily] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
