<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel: The Horror&#8230;the Horror</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090107/intel-the-horror-the-horror/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090107/intel-the-horror-the-horror/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:08:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Intel Reports Fourth-Quarter Travesty [Digital Daily] &#124; LinkTouch</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090107/intel-the-horror-the-horror/comment-page-1/#comment-4422</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel Reports Fourth-Quarter Travesty [Digital Daily] &#124; LinkTouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=10819#comment-4422</guid>
		<description>[...] Intel&#8217;s results were in line with its twice-lowered guidance and analyst estimates. So while God-awful-lousy, things certainly could have been worse. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Intel&#8217;s results were in line with its twice-lowered guidance and analyst estimates. So while God-awful-lousy, things certainly could have been worse. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel Reports Fourth-Quarter Travesty &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090107/intel-the-horror-the-horror/comment-page-1/#comment-4411</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel Reports Fourth-Quarter Travesty &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=10819#comment-4411</guid>
		<description>[...] Intel&#8217;s results were in line with its twice lowered guidance and analyst estimates. So while God-awful-lousy, things certainly could have been worse. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Intel&#8217;s results were in line with its twice lowered guidance and analyst estimates. So while God-awful-lousy, things certainly could have been worse. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Portocarrero</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090107/intel-the-horror-the-horror/comment-page-1/#comment-4196</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Portocarrero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=10819#comment-4196</guid>
		<description>This is really bad. That Intel couldn&#039;t even meet their own revised estimate of only two months ago? Jeez. 

I&#039;ve never had a computer with an AMD chip, but I&#039;m considering it for my next purchase—we&#039;ll see if they can keep their forecasts in order. Otherwise, why have them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really bad. That Intel couldn&#8217;t even meet their own revised estimate of only two months ago? Jeez. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never had a computer with an AMD chip, but I&#8217;m considering it for my next purchase—we&#8217;ll see if they can keep their forecasts in order. Otherwise, why have them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
