<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beware the GOOG!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081219/beware-the-goog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081219/beware-the-goog/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:28:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google: Satisfaction Guaranteed &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081219/beware-the-goog/comment-page-1/#comment-12240</link>
		<dc:creator>Google: Satisfaction Guaranteed &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=10056#comment-12240</guid>
		<description>[...] leads the search industry in market share. No surprise, then, that it leads it in customer satisfaction as well. The company has once again [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] leads the search industry in market share. No surprise, then, that it leads it in customer satisfaction as well. The company has once again [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Beach</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081219/beware-the-goog/comment-page-1/#comment-3984</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=10056#comment-3984</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that search, if it is a natural monopoly at all, is far less of one than operating systems software is.

Yes, Apple has taken back some market share, but many of those users are also forced to run Windows since Apple has chosen not to go head to head with MS on office products (or much else).

I&#039;m quite happy to see Yahoo, Ask and other similar companies compete with Google.

Firefox allows me to choose my search engine, while under certain circumstances Verizon locks me into a Yahoo relationship.

At some point I&#039;m fearful that Windows will lock its users further into features of Live.com.  Already I can&#039;t use some of those features on my Apple or Linux machines.  But worse, I&#039;m almost sure that people using the windows/Live lash-up will find it difficult if not impossible to mix and match those two products with search, maps, and so on from other vendors.  Microsoft has never worked that way and they show no signs of starting.

If the press doesn&#039;t jump on this now, we are going to live the 90s all over again with MS competitors rendered moribund while the slow wheels of justice start trying to provide a level playing field long after the game is over.

Google may not be an angel in every respect, but they are also not the enemy of innovation to the extent that Microsoft is and  don&#039;t see that it is possible for them to become one any time soon.

A Google vended OS, office suite, Chrome and so on could change that, but those components are things Microsoft already has working to its advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that search, if it is a natural monopoly at all, is far less of one than operating systems software is.</p>
<p>Yes, Apple has taken back some market share, but many of those users are also forced to run Windows since Apple has chosen not to go head to head with MS on office products (or much else).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m quite happy to see Yahoo, Ask and other similar companies compete with Google.</p>
<p>Firefox allows me to choose my search engine, while under certain circumstances Verizon locks me into a Yahoo relationship.</p>
<p>At some point I&#8217;m fearful that Windows will lock its users further into features of Live.com.  Already I can&#8217;t use some of those features on my Apple or Linux machines.  But worse, I&#8217;m almost sure that people using the windows/Live lash-up will find it difficult if not impossible to mix and match those two products with search, maps, and so on from other vendors.  Microsoft has never worked that way and they show no signs of starting.</p>
<p>If the press doesn&#8217;t jump on this now, we are going to live the 90s all over again with MS competitors rendered moribund while the slow wheels of justice start trying to provide a level playing field long after the game is over.</p>
<p>Google may not be an angel in every respect, but they are also not the enemy of innovation to the extent that Microsoft is and  don&#8217;t see that it is possible for them to become one any time soon.</p>
<p>A Google vended OS, office suite, Chrome and so on could change that, but those components are things Microsoft already has working to its advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David desJardins</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081219/beware-the-goog/comment-page-1/#comment-3982</link>
		<dc:creator>David desJardins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 07:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=10056#comment-3982</guid>
		<description>&quot;Natural monopoly&quot;?  With zero switching costs?  Hmm, not possible that Google is just doing a better job?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Natural monopoly&#8221;?  With zero switching costs?  Hmm, not possible that Google is just doing a better job?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
