<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congratulations Google, You're the New Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081203/googlenewmicrosoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081203/googlenewmicrosoft/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:08:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tech Whiz Underground &#187; A Google Book Search for “Antitrust Law” Ought to Come in Handy Here…</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081203/googlenewmicrosoft/comment-page-1/#comment-6518</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Whiz Underground &#187; A Google Book Search for “Antitrust Law” Ought to Come in Handy Here…</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=9108#comment-6518</guid>
		<description>[...] Book Search for “Antitrust Law” Ought to Come in Handy Here…          Google&#8217;s gone and run afoul of the Department of Justice again. Its interest piqued by the growing outcry over the company’s proposed book-search settlement [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Book Search for “Antitrust Law” Ought to Come in Handy Here…          Google&#8217;s gone and run afoul of the Department of Justice again. Its interest piqued by the growing outcry over the company’s proposed book-search settlement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Google Book Search for &#8220;Antitrust Law&#8221; Ought to Come in Handy Here &#8230; &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081203/googlenewmicrosoft/comment-page-1/#comment-6515</link>
		<dc:creator>A Google Book Search for &#8220;Antitrust Law&#8221; Ought to Come in Handy Here &#8230; &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=9108#comment-6515</guid>
		<description>[...] (GOOG) gone and run afoul of the Department of Justice again. Its interest piqued by the growing outcry over the company’s proposed book-search settlement [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (GOOG) gone and run afoul of the Department of Justice again. Its interest piqued by the growing outcry over the company’s proposed book-search settlement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beware the GOOG! &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081203/googlenewmicrosoft/comment-page-1/#comment-3973</link>
		<dc:creator>Beware the GOOG! &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=9108#comment-3973</guid>
		<description>[...] With Google closing in on 70 percent market share, two things are increasingly clear: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With Google closing in on 70 percent market share, two things are increasingly clear: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: God-Google-Satan: The Oneness &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081203/googlenewmicrosoft/comment-page-1/#comment-3872</link>
		<dc:creator>God-Google-Satan: The Oneness &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=9108#comment-3872</guid>
		<description>[...] Sure, everyone loved Google in 2001. But in 2008 they fear it. The Google of 2001 was a fascinating corporate anomaly, a company known for its colorful campus, lunar exploration grants and a cafeteria so good it was profiled in Food &amp; Wine. The Google of 2008 is a different beast entirely. It&#8217;s a company accused of privacy violations in the states and abroad. It&#8217;s a company whose fast-broadening reach has given it unchecked power. And, it&#8217;s a company that last month came within three hours of a Department of Justice antitrust suit. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sure, everyone loved Google in 2001. But in 2008 they fear it. The Google of 2001 was a fascinating corporate anomaly, a company known for its colorful campus, lunar exploration grants and a cafeteria so good it was profiled in Food &#38; Wine. The Google of 2008 is a different beast entirely. It&#8217;s a company accused of privacy violations in the states and abroad. It&#8217;s a company whose fast-broadening reach has given it unchecked power. And, it&#8217;s a company that last month came within three hours of a Department of Justice antitrust suit. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Martin</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081203/googlenewmicrosoft/comment-page-1/#comment-3684</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=9108#comment-3684</guid>
		<description>Microsoft would arm twist companies into doing things their way. I don&#039;t see Google doing that. How can you claim they are far worse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft would arm twist companies into doing things their way. I don&#8217;t see Google doing that. How can you claim they are far worse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harrison</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081203/googlenewmicrosoft/comment-page-1/#comment-3679</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=9108#comment-3679</guid>
		<description>pps: Google is worse than Microsoft ever was. Microsoft was arrogant. Google is arrogant but claims innocence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pps: Google is worse than Microsoft ever was. Microsoft was arrogant. Google is arrogant but claims innocence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harrison</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081203/googlenewmicrosoft/comment-page-1/#comment-3678</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=9108#comment-3678</guid>
		<description>p.s. oh, I forgot, Terry the media veteran visionary guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s. oh, I forgot, Terry the media veteran visionary guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harrison</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081203/googlenewmicrosoft/comment-page-1/#comment-3677</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=9108#comment-3677</guid>
		<description>bottom line: Google doesn&#039;t need Yahoo. Yahoo needed Google.

Yahoo should have acquired Google back in 2001/2.

Terry Semel scuttled that deal.

Call Terry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bottom line: Google doesn&#8217;t need Yahoo. Yahoo needed Google.</p>
<p>Yahoo should have acquired Google back in 2001/2.</p>
<p>Terry Semel scuttled that deal.</p>
<p>Call Terry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
