<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wonder How Verizon Feels About Passing on the iPhone, Now &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081022/wonder-how-verizon-feels-about-passing-on-the-iphone-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081022/wonder-how-verizon-feels-about-passing-on-the-iphone-now/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T: Thank God for Vitamin i [Digital Daily] &#124; LinkTouch</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081022/wonder-how-verizon-feels-about-passing-on-the-iphone-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4883</link>
		<dc:creator>AT&#38;T: Thank God for Vitamin i [Digital Daily] &#124; LinkTouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=7188#comment-4883</guid>
		<description>[...] God for vitamin i, eh? Apple&#8217;s (AAPL) device is not only wildly popular, but quite lucrative as well. Average revenue per user for iPhones is 1.6 times higher than with other AT&amp;T handsets, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] God for vitamin i, eh? Apple&#8217;s (AAPL) device is not only wildly popular, but quite lucrative as well. Average revenue per user for iPhones is 1.6 times higher than with other AT&#38;T handsets, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T Earnings: Thank God for Vitamin i &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081022/wonder-how-verizon-feels-about-passing-on-the-iphone-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4871</link>
		<dc:creator>AT&#38;T Earnings: Thank God for Vitamin i &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=7188#comment-4871</guid>
		<description>[...] God for vitamin i, eh? Apple&#8217;s device is not only wildy popular, but quite lucrative as well. Average revenue per user for iPhones is 1.6 times higher than with other AT&amp;T handsets, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] God for vitamin i, eh? Apple&#8217;s device is not only wildy popular, but quite lucrative as well. Average revenue per user for iPhones is 1.6 times higher than with other AT&#38;T handsets, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Could Also &#8216;Figuratively&#8217; Take Over the Laptop Market if MacBook&#8217;s Were Free &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081022/wonder-how-verizon-feels-about-passing-on-the-iphone-now/comment-page-1/#comment-3175</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple Could Also &#8216;Figuratively&#8217; Take Over the Laptop Market if MacBook&#8217;s Were Free &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=7188#comment-3175</guid>
		<description>[...] that AT&amp;T&#8217;s subsidies of the iPhone 3G’s current upfront purchase cost &#8212; which reduced its third-quarter earnings by approximately $900 million, or 10 cents per share &#8212; may have left it with little stomach for further subsidies. And leaving aside, as well, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that AT&#38;T&#8217;s subsidies of the iPhone 3G’s current upfront purchase cost &#8212; which reduced its third-quarter earnings by approximately $900 million, or 10 cents per share &#8212; may have left it with little stomach for further subsidies. And leaving aside, as well, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Raymond</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081022/wonder-how-verizon-feels-about-passing-on-the-iphone-now/comment-page-1/#comment-3129</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=7188#comment-3129</guid>
		<description>If this article is correct, it wasn&#039;t AT&amp;T who landed the iPhone deal, it was Cingular (that AT&amp;T later purchased).
http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/10/commentary/lewis_fortune_iphone.fortune/index.htm

I heard, and this article confirms, Jobs didn&#039;t even have a prototype when it first struck up the deal with Cingular.  That can explain why Verizon balked.  Here is a nice article from USAToday on the topic.
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2007-01-28-verizon-iphone_x.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this article is correct, it wasn&#8217;t AT&amp;T who landed the iPhone deal, it was Cingular (that AT&amp;T later purchased).<br />
<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/10/commentary/lewis_fortune_iphone.fortune/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/1...../index.htm</a></p>
<p>I heard, and this article confirms, Jobs didn&#8217;t even have a prototype when it first struck up the deal with Cingular.  That can explain why Verizon balked.  Here is a nice article from USAToday on the topic.<br />
<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2007-01-28-verizon-iphone_x.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/tech/n.....hone_x.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

