<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE8 "Epically Porcine"</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080903/ie-8-epically-porcine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080903/ie-8-epically-porcine/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:08:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Habrá al menos un infiltrado en el XVIII Encuentro &#171; GUG MVD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080903/ie-8-epically-porcine/comment-page-1/#comment-2366</link>
		<dc:creator>Habrá al menos un infiltrado en el XVIII Encuentro &#171; GUG MVD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=4366#comment-2366</guid>
		<description>[...] de Microsoft en su propio sistema operativo, de paso la  beta 2 de l IE ha sido considerada como &#8220;Epically Porcine&#8221; realmente habrá que esperar un poco más para saber el daño, pero un market share del 40% debe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de Microsoft en su propio sistema operativo, de paso la  beta 2 de l IE ha sido considerada como &#8220;Epically Porcine&#8221; realmente habrá que esperar un poco más para saber el daño, pero un market share del 40% debe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IE8 le glouton de mémoire - Gizmodo - Tant d'amour pour ces fabuleux nouveaux gadgets, c'est surnaturel.</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080903/ie-8-epically-porcine/comment-page-1/#comment-2312</link>
		<dc:creator>IE8 le glouton de mémoire - Gizmodo - Tant d'amour pour ces fabuleux nouveaux gadgets, c'est surnaturel.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=4366#comment-2312</guid>
		<description>[...] Les chiffres s&#8217;approchent des tests de vitesse de Lifehacker (avec Chrome). Les internautes vont-ils se toruner plus volontiers vers Firefox et Chrome? Microsoft doit se faire du soucis. [Exo.blog via Digital Daily] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Les chiffres s&#8217;approchent des tests de vitesse de Lifehacker (avec Chrome). Les internautes vont-ils se toruner plus volontiers vers Firefox et Chrome? Microsoft doit se faire du soucis. [Exo.blog via Digital Daily] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Freeman</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080903/ie-8-epically-porcine/comment-page-1/#comment-2311</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=4366#comment-2311</guid>
		<description>typical. some smartass tries to fry microsoft because of their own bias. then you try to qualify the troll by saying yes its a beta but.... . if you arent going to be responsible in your &#039;reviews&#039; then you should just go to cnet or ziff davis or somewhere else where we all know you think microsoft is evil and everyone else is good. my original post is edited because of the censorship that exists here. suffice it to say that walt mosberg gave an unbiased review of chrome. john paczkowski did not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>typical. some smartass tries to fry microsoft because of their own bias. then you try to qualify the troll by saying yes its a beta but&#8230;. . if you arent going to be responsible in your &#8216;reviews&#8217; then you should just go to cnet or ziff davis or somewhere else where we all know you think microsoft is evil and everyone else is good. my original post is edited because of the censorship that exists here. suffice it to say that walt mosberg gave an unbiased review of chrome. john paczkowski did not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Mag</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080903/ie-8-epically-porcine/comment-page-1/#comment-2302</link>
		<dc:creator>George Mag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=4366#comment-2302</guid>
		<description>Great photo. It expalins it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great photo. It expalins it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Pannone</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080903/ie-8-epically-porcine/comment-page-1/#comment-2295</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Pannone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=4366#comment-2295</guid>
		<description>I heard on CNet&#039;s Buzz Out Loud the likely reason for this is that IE8 beta was built for quad core processors. When it does not run on a quad it takes up significant more memory. Surely Microsoft will have this fixed so that browser checks and adapts to processor on each computer. If true this issue could be getting blown out of proportion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard on CNet&#8217;s Buzz Out Loud the likely reason for this is that IE8 beta was built for quad core processors. When it does not run on a quad it takes up significant more memory. Surely Microsoft will have this fixed so that browser checks and adapts to processor on each computer. If true this issue could be getting blown out of proportion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
