<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seriously, You Have No Privacy. Get Over It.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080703/seriously-you-have-no-privacy-get-over-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080703/seriously-you-have-no-privacy-get-over-it/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Beach</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080703/seriously-you-have-no-privacy-get-over-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=2682#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>In all cases I can think of when Google acquired another company they eventually merged their user base by forcing baught company&#039;s users to adopt a Google user ID.  They&#039;ve never done this with YouTube and I&#039;ve wondered why.   Is it a privacy issue, or do they just not want to deal with the very large existing YouTube user base, since I think the userid gets used in a lot of ways in the &quot;social structure&quot; there.

With Andrew Quomo (a Democrat from New York of all places) forcing several national ISPs to cripple their News servers because they didn&#039;t promptly respond to take-down requests for porn, I&#039;d say  both our privacy and freedom are rapidly eroding for reasons that have nothing to do with terrorism (and in most cases don&#039;t actually do anything to solve a problem they intend to address).

At the rate we are going it won&#039;t be too long before knee and elbow pads will be required for a walk down the street.  If you ask the government to play mommy to you... you can&#039;t complain for getting spanked when she is in a bad mood.

Did anyone even get reprimanded when the State Department admitted to losing track of 30,000 laptops?  Not that I&#039;ve heard, and I don&#039;t think it was a typo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all cases I can think of when Google acquired another company they eventually merged their user base by forcing baught company&#8217;s users to adopt a Google user ID.  They&#8217;ve never done this with YouTube and I&#8217;ve wondered why.   Is it a privacy issue, or do they just not want to deal with the very large existing YouTube user base, since I think the userid gets used in a lot of ways in the &#8220;social structure&#8221; there.</p>
<p>With Andrew Quomo (a Democrat from New York of all places) forcing several national ISPs to cripple their News servers because they didn&#8217;t promptly respond to take-down requests for porn, I&#8217;d say  both our privacy and freedom are rapidly eroding for reasons that have nothing to do with terrorism (and in most cases don&#8217;t actually do anything to solve a problem they intend to address).</p>
<p>At the rate we are going it won&#8217;t be too long before knee and elbow pads will be required for a walk down the street.  If you ask the government to play mommy to you&#8230; you can&#8217;t complain for getting spanked when she is in a bad mood.</p>
<p>Did anyone even get reprimanded when the State Department admitted to losing track of 30,000 laptops?  Not that I&#8217;ve heard, and I don&#8217;t think it was a typo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

