<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coming Soon From Motorola: STNKR, CLNKR and FUBAR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080424/moto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080424/moto/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motorola Reports Smaller-Than-Expected Second-Quarter Disaster &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080424/moto/comment-page-1/#comment-1648</link>
		<dc:creator>Motorola Reports Smaller-Than-Expected Second-Quarter Disaster &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080424/moto/#comment-1648</guid>
		<description>[...] Quite a shock for Motorola (MOT) observers, who had figured the company was prepping a $124 million second-quarter net loss, about four times larger than the one it posted a year ago. A bit of a shock too for Motorola, which itself had predicted a loss of two cents a share. In short, great news for the company, which may have just turned the tide in an ugly year-long trend of losses. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quite a shock for Motorola (MOT) observers, who had figured the company was prepping a $124 million second-quarter net loss, about four times larger than the one it posted a year ago. A bit of a shock too for Motorola, which itself had predicted a loss of two cents a share. In short, great news for the company, which may have just turned the tide in an ugly year-long trend of losses. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Barnes</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080424/moto/comment-page-1/#comment-1286</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080424/moto/#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>“Motorola is still a huge business and an iconic company,” is delusional.
Huge, yes.
Iconic, no so much.
I am sure the brand is iconic among NFL teams as Motorola appears to have 100% dominance of headsets.
But, among teenagers and 20-somethings who buy cellphones, I suspect that it is Motorola who?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Motorola is still a huge business and an iconic company,” is delusional.<br />
Huge, yes.<br />
Iconic, no so much.<br />
I am sure the brand is iconic among NFL teams as Motorola appears to have 100% dominance of headsets.<br />
But, among teenagers and 20-somethings who buy cellphones, I suspect that it is Motorola who?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

