<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New From Google: Google Acquisition Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080408/app-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080408/app-engine/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:28:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cyndy Aleo-Carreira</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080408/app-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyndy Aleo-Carreira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080408/app-engine/#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>Mac, I absolutely read it. But they don&#039;t say what languages they will eventually support, nor when, and based on Gmail being in beta for over four years now, I expect nothing different.

Why would Amazon want to &quot;follow suit?&quot; Google is chasing THEM, not the reverse. Amazon offers a real virtual machine, and charges only based on what services you will use. Why should I pay for Big Table if I don&#039;t use it? Amazon doesn&#039;t lock developers into a specific API. If I were still doing development, the choice would be obvious, and it certainly wouldn&#039;t be GAE.

@Ed My understanding is that Ruby in any form is not used internally at Google. Which makes me wonder if they&#039;ll ever support it in GAE at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mac, I absolutely read it. But they don&#8217;t say what languages they will eventually support, nor when, and based on Gmail being in beta for over four years now, I expect nothing different.</p>
<p>Why would Amazon want to &#8220;follow suit?&#8221; Google is chasing THEM, not the reverse. Amazon offers a real virtual machine, and charges only based on what services you will use. Why should I pay for Big Table if I don&#8217;t use it? Amazon doesn&#8217;t lock developers into a specific API. If I were still doing development, the choice would be obvious, and it certainly wouldn&#8217;t be GAE.</p>
<p>@Ed My understanding is that Ruby in any form is not used internally at Google. Which makes me wonder if they&#8217;ll ever support it in GAE at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Beach</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080408/app-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1246</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080408/app-engine/#comment-1246</guid>
		<description>Geez, doesn&#039;t anybody read the original articles?  Python-only is a short term situation.  Free entry level is a permanent situation (at least according to Google documentation).  Seems like a lot of bad info started out over at a ZD blog and has been parroted elsewhere.

In any event, I dispute the conclusions reached (at length in my blog and the ValleyWag article).

While there is no doubt that will make it easier for Google to Cherry-pick good applications, do you REALLY think that is a big sticking point to their strategies?  For most of these things the code could be re-written from scratch while the pointy haired bosses are still haggling over the price.

Take a deep breath.  Think about it a little.

Rackspace, companies like them, and all the middle-man &quot;hosting&quot; companies that sell disk space and CPU cycles by the pound are the one who&#039;s business models vanish if this catches on.

And if you have ever dealt first-hand with some of these vermin, you will realize that this makes the world a better place.  

I anticipate several other large companies to follow suite.  MS and Amazon are certainly positioned to do so, as is Rackspace for that matter, they just have to re-define what their service actually consists of and who their primary customers might be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, doesn&#8217;t anybody read the original articles?  Python-only is a short term situation.  Free entry level is a permanent situation (at least according to Google documentation).  Seems like a lot of bad info started out over at a ZD blog and has been parroted elsewhere.</p>
<p>In any event, I dispute the conclusions reached (at length in my blog and the ValleyWag article).</p>
<p>While there is no doubt that will make it easier for Google to Cherry-pick good applications, do you REALLY think that is a big sticking point to their strategies?  For most of these things the code could be re-written from scratch while the pointy haired bosses are still haggling over the price.</p>
<p>Take a deep breath.  Think about it a little.</p>
<p>Rackspace, companies like them, and all the middle-man &#8220;hosting&#8221; companies that sell disk space and CPU cycles by the pound are the one who&#8217;s business models vanish if this catches on.</p>
<p>And if you have ever dealt first-hand with some of these vermin, you will realize that this makes the world a better place.  </p>
<p>I anticipate several other large companies to follow suite.  MS and Amazon are certainly positioned to do so, as is Rackspace for that matter, they just have to re-define what their service actually consists of and who their primary customers might be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Anuff</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080408/app-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1245</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Anuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080408/app-engine/#comment-1245</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that Python is a lock-in strategy, there are certain languages that can provide the full benefit of cloud computing and some that can&#039;t.  I expect you&#039;ll see the languages that Google uses internally supported first (Python, Java).  Does Google use Ruby for any of it&#039;s applications?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that Python is a lock-in strategy, there are certain languages that can provide the full benefit of cloud computing and some that can&#8217;t.  I expect you&#8217;ll see the languages that Google uses internally supported first (Python, Java).  Does Google use Ruby for any of it&#8217;s applications?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyndy Aleo-Carreira</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080408/app-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyndy Aleo-Carreira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080408/app-engine/#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>Well, that certainly explains forcing everyone to Python. Does that mean they will NEVER support Rails though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that certainly explains forcing everyone to Python. Does that mean they will NEVER support Rails though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
