<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Auto-Update Installs Mozilla CEO Tirade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080324/lilly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080324/lilly/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:08:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Minnihan</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080324/lilly/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>John Minnihan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080324/lilly/#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>What does this have to do with trust?

I&#039;ll answer myself: nothing.  

I&#039;m looking at this now (inside a Fusion instance of XP).  I see an Apple Software Update dialog box with three items listed: 

 - iTunes + Quicktime
 - Quicktime
 - Safari

with their respective versions &amp; sizes noted in the right margin. In the left margin is where the controversy lay: each of these items, even Safari - a new piece of software that has never been installed on this image - has an &#039;Install&#039; checkbox that is auto-checked.

That means (not to belabor the point) that these items will be installed or updated when I click the Install button.

The bottom button is clearly marked:

   &#039; Install 3 items&#039;

Let me make that point crystal clear: it is labeled &#039;Install 3 items&#039;  not &#039;Update 3 items&#039; or &#039;Fix 3 items&#039; .  Install is the active verb.

And that dialog box will sit there - doing nothing - forever, unless you click &#039;Install 3 items&#039;.  

If John Lilly wants to argue that users shouldn&#039;t blindly click &#039;Install&#039;, then I agree.  But that&#039;s not his argument.  He&#039;s suggesting that Apple is trying to sneak Safari onto the Windows desktop.  I call hogwash.  Is Apple trying to distribute Safari?  Of course, and this is the best channel they have for that purpose.

Read the dialog.  It clearly states what is about to be installed by clicking the &#039;Install&#039; button.  If you don&#039;t want one or more of those things installed, uncheck it.

For testing purposes, I wish to keep Safari off of this XP instance.  Thus, I unchecked &#039;Safari&#039; and not surprisingly, it was not installed.

This is ALL about revenue.  No one wants to get blindsided like they did with Adobe&#039;s shockwave / flash player.  By the time anyone figured out what Adobe had done, the player was on 90+% of the desktops.  Talk about a channel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does this have to do with trust?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll answer myself: nothing.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking at this now (inside a Fusion instance of XP).  I see an Apple Software Update dialog box with three items listed: </p>
<p> &#8211; iTunes + Quicktime<br />
 &#8211; Quicktime<br />
 &#8211; Safari</p>
<p>with their respective versions &amp; sizes noted in the right margin. In the left margin is where the controversy lay: each of these items, even Safari &#8211; a new piece of software that has never been installed on this image &#8211; has an &#8216;Install&#8217; checkbox that is auto-checked.</p>
<p>That means (not to belabor the point) that these items will be installed or updated when I click the Install button.</p>
<p>The bottom button is clearly marked:</p>
<p>   &#8216; Install 3 items&#8217;</p>
<p>Let me make that point crystal clear: it is labeled &#8216;Install 3 items&#8217;  not &#8216;Update 3 items&#8217; or &#8216;Fix 3 items&#8217; .  Install is the active verb.</p>
<p>And that dialog box will sit there &#8211; doing nothing &#8211; forever, unless you click &#8216;Install 3 items&#8217;.  </p>
<p>If John Lilly wants to argue that users shouldn&#8217;t blindly click &#8216;Install&#8217;, then I agree.  But that&#8217;s not his argument.  He&#8217;s suggesting that Apple is trying to sneak Safari onto the Windows desktop.  I call hogwash.  Is Apple trying to distribute Safari?  Of course, and this is the best channel they have for that purpose.</p>
<p>Read the dialog.  It clearly states what is about to be installed by clicking the &#8216;Install&#8217; button.  If you don&#8217;t want one or more of those things installed, uncheck it.</p>
<p>For testing purposes, I wish to keep Safari off of this XP instance.  Thus, I unchecked &#8216;Safari&#8217; and not surprisingly, it was not installed.</p>
<p>This is ALL about revenue.  No one wants to get blindsided like they did with Adobe&#8217;s shockwave / flash player.  By the time anyone figured out what Adobe had done, the player was on 90+% of the desktops.  Talk about a channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
