<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple HQ on Defcon 1 Tantrum Alert After iPhone 2.0 Crack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080312/iphone-20-cracked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080312/iphone-20-cracked/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:08:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: iPhone Jailbreaking is Illegal. No It&#8217;s Not. Who Cares? &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080312/iphone-20-cracked/comment-page-1/#comment-5179</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone Jailbreaking is Illegal. No It&#8217;s Not. Who Cares? &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080312/iphone-20-cracked/#comment-5179</guid>
		<description>[...]  Apple HQ on Defcon 1 Tantrum Alert After iPhone 2.0 Crack [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Apple HQ on Defcon 1 Tantrum Alert After iPhone 2.0 Crack [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paczkowski</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080312/iphone-20-cracked/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080312/iphone-20-cracked/#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>It didn&#039;t seem like a tremendous leap of illogic at the time I wrote it. But perhaps you&#039;re right. Anyway, here&#039;s the thinking that led me to my &quot;wet blanket&quot; theory:

Coming as it does so soon after the announcement of the iPhone&#039;s software roadmap, news of the device&#039;s hacked, yet still unreleased, operating system has got to be embarrassing for Apple. Essentially it means the company has &lt;em&gt;potentially&lt;/em&gt; lost control of the sole point of entry to the device through which it had hoped to vet third-party applications. And that means it has &lt;em&gt;potentially&lt;/em&gt; lost control of the quality and nature of the apps that can be deployed on the iPhone.

That might give companies considering enterprise deployments of the iPhone pause. There&#039;s a &lt;em&gt;potential&lt;/em&gt; security issue there. Which isn&#039;t to say that the iPhone is any more or less secure than any other mobile platform, just that from an administrative perspective, the  devil you know is better than the one you don&#039;t -- even if the devil you know is Windows Mobile or the Blackberry OS.  So in the end, I guess it&#039;s sort  of a &quot;why bother&quot; issue, with the perception that the iPhone is so easily hackable undermining its sales to enterprise.

One last thing: It&#039;s my understanding that the SDK actually does contain a beta of the iPhone 2.0 firmware.

Thanks for trading words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It didn&#8217;t seem like a tremendous leap of illogic at the time I wrote it. But perhaps you&#8217;re right. Anyway, here&#8217;s the thinking that led me to my &#8220;wet blanket&#8221; theory:</p>
<p>Coming as it does so soon after the announcement of the iPhone&#8217;s software roadmap, news of the device&#8217;s hacked, yet still unreleased, operating system has got to be embarrassing for Apple. Essentially it means the company has <em>potentially</em> lost control of the sole point of entry to the device through which it had hoped to vet third-party applications. And that means it has <em>potentially</em> lost control of the quality and nature of the apps that can be deployed on the iPhone.</p>
<p>That might give companies considering enterprise deployments of the iPhone pause. There&#8217;s a <em>potential</em> security issue there. Which isn&#8217;t to say that the iPhone is any more or less secure than any other mobile platform, just that from an administrative perspective, the  devil you know is better than the one you don&#8217;t &#8212; even if the devil you know is Windows Mobile or the Blackberry OS.  So in the end, I guess it&#8217;s sort  of a &#8220;why bother&#8221; issue, with the perception that the iPhone is so easily hackable undermining its sales to enterprise.</p>
<p>One last thing: It&#8217;s my understanding that the SDK actually does contain a beta of the iPhone 2.0 firmware.</p>
<p>Thanks for trading words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Long</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080312/iphone-20-cracked/comment-page-1/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080312/iphone-20-cracked/#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>Ummm... perhaps next time you can explain your tremendous leap in illogic. How does being able to run more applications throw &quot;a wet blanket on Apple’s (AAPL) aspirations for the iPhone in enterprise&quot;?

And how do you know that it&#039;s not going to be easy for Apple to close the hole? Oh, I see, you&#039;re just quoting the hacker who made the boast.

And isn&#039;t the actual version of the software in the SDK 1.2, and not 2.0?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm&#8230; perhaps next time you can explain your tremendous leap in illogic. How does being able to run more applications throw &#8220;a wet blanket on Apple’s (AAPL) aspirations for the iPhone in enterprise&#8221;?</p>
<p>And how do you know that it&#8217;s not going to be easy for Apple to close the hole? Oh, I see, you&#8217;re just quoting the hacker who made the boast.</p>
<p>And isn&#8217;t the actual version of the software in the SDK 1.2, and not 2.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
