<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DiaperFetishFactory.com Is Sending a Story to Your Profile!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071121/facebook-vs-moveon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071121/facebook-vs-moveon/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook's Sponsored Stories Are Social Ads Without Controversy &#124; Peter Kafka &#124; MediaMemo &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071121/facebook-vs-moveon/comment-page-1/#comment-75703</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook's Sponsored Stories Are Social Ads Without Controversy &#124; Peter Kafka &#124; MediaMemo &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071121/facebook-vs-moveon/#comment-75703</guid>
		<description>[...] Facebook unveiled a plan to let brands turn Facebook users&#8217; online activities into ads. Cue uproar, and an eventual apology from Mark [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook unveiled a plan to let brands turn Facebook users&#8217; online activities into ads. Cue uproar, and an eventual apology from Mark [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook and the &#8220;Duke Nukem Forever&#8221; of Business Models &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071121/facebook-vs-moveon/comment-page-1/#comment-2953</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook and the &#8220;Duke Nukem Forever&#8221; of Business Models &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071121/facebook-vs-moveon/#comment-2953</guid>
		<description>[...] In three years or so when Facebook finally settles on a business model. Assuming, of course, that it&#8217;s a viable one. And that it doesn&#8217;t send privacy advocates into paroxysms of angry status updates. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In three years or so when Facebook finally settles on a business model. Assuming, of course, that it&#8217;s a viable one. And that it doesn&#8217;t send privacy advocates into paroxysms of angry status updates. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook and the &#8216;Duke Nukem Forever&#8217; of Business Models &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071121/facebook-vs-moveon/comment-page-1/#comment-2945</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook and the &#8216;Duke Nukem Forever&#8217; of Business Models &#124; John Paczkowski &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071121/facebook-vs-moveon/#comment-2945</guid>
		<description>[...] In three years or so when Facebook finally settles on a business model. Assuming, of course, it&#8217;s a viable one. And it doesn&#8217;t send privacy advocates into paroxysms of angry status updates. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In three years or so when Facebook finally settles on a business model. Assuming, of course, it&#8217;s a viable one. And it doesn&#8217;t send privacy advocates into paroxysms of angry status updates. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

