<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do You Take This Robot to Be Your Lawfully Welded Husband?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071015/so-i-married-an-animaton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071015/so-i-married-an-animaton/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: loverevolver4</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071015/so-i-married-an-animaton/comment-page-1/#comment-24176</link>
		<dc:creator>loverevolver4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071015/so-i-married-an-animaton/#comment-24176</guid>
		<description>This is a fascinating post, I was at a &lt;a rel=&quot;follow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.ucg.org/bible/bible-reading&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bible reading&lt;/a&gt; class a few days ago when me and the other members somehow started talking about Gods view of robots and the digital age we now live in, and possible references to it within the bible. It’s a really interesting subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fascinating post, I was at a <a rel="follow" href="http://www.ucg.org/bible/bible-reading" rel="nofollow">bible reading</a> class a few days ago when me and the other members somehow started talking about Gods view of robots and the digital age we now live in, and possible references to it within the bible. It’s a really interesting subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hello Moto</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071015/so-i-married-an-animaton/comment-page-1/#comment-16997</link>
		<dc:creator>Hello Moto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071015/so-i-married-an-animaton/#comment-16997</guid>
		<description>artificial intelligence
?
Use artificial intelligence in a Sentence
See web results for artificial intelligence
See images of artificial intelligence
–noun
the capacity of a computer to perform operations analogousto learning and decision making in humans, as by an expert system, a program for CAD or CAM, or a program for the perception and recognition of shapes in computer vision systems. Any person who believes in religion tends to be anti open to the idea of this article, because they believe it will take away from the moral grounds of a &quot;common&quot; family. Frankly, when the singularity occurs as time progresses in the year 2035, there will be no way of telling robots from humans aside from actually taking them apart, biological computers will be living, breathing machines, a.k.a HUMANS. Currently there is testing on cellular hard drives, in which cells themselves become storage that can hold huge amounts of data. So don&#039;t complain, you won&#039;t be able to tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>artificial intelligence<br />
?<br />
Use artificial intelligence in a Sentence<br />
See web results for artificial intelligence<br />
See images of artificial intelligence<br />
–noun<br />
the capacity of a computer to perform operations analogousto learning and decision making in humans, as by an expert system, a program for CAD or CAM, or a program for the perception and recognition of shapes in computer vision systems. Any person who believes in religion tends to be anti open to the idea of this article, because they believe it will take away from the moral grounds of a &#8220;common&#8221; family. Frankly, when the singularity occurs as time progresses in the year 2035, there will be no way of telling robots from humans aside from actually taking them apart, biological computers will be living, breathing machines, a.k.a HUMANS. Currently there is testing on cellular hard drives, in which cells themselves become storage that can hold huge amounts of data. So don&#8217;t complain, you won&#8217;t be able to tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avox Basileus</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071015/so-i-married-an-animaton/comment-page-1/#comment-16990</link>
		<dc:creator>Avox Basileus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071015/so-i-married-an-animaton/#comment-16990</guid>
		<description>Artificial intelligence is the act of nonliving while gaining knowledge of the others around you. Not only would these not be lovers but they would enevr even come close to being a real person. But what really defines a person? The ability to think and feel emotions without a program telling you how to feel them? I believe it&#039;s that ever popular word that is thrown around by religion and other unimportant groups. A soul. Whether or not that&#039;s what truly means somebody is a person. A computer will never have one. Thus...humanity strikes up another mark the wall of trying to be God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artificial intelligence is the act of nonliving while gaining knowledge of the others around you. Not only would these not be lovers but they would enevr even come close to being a real person. But what really defines a person? The ability to think and feel emotions without a program telling you how to feel them? I believe it&#8217;s that ever popular word that is thrown around by religion and other unimportant groups. A soul. Whether or not that&#8217;s what truly means somebody is a person. A computer will never have one. Thus&#8230;humanity strikes up another mark the wall of trying to be God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Welch</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071015/so-i-married-an-animaton/comment-page-1/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20071015/so-i-married-an-animaton/#comment-658</guid>
		<description>Wow, the ultimat expression of narcissim. Just because a machine can be programmed to &quot;like&quot; you doesn&#039;t mean it does in reality. Machines are non-sentient, and I really doubt they ever will be otherwise. It&#039;s no different than expecting a toaster to care if it burns breakfast.

Even if it were possible to &quot;create&quot; sentience, to &quot;program&quot; a robot to like you is an illusion. What makes love so siginificant is that the other person chooses to love you, without you making them love you. Which is the basic reason why real love is not the same as paying a prostitute to say she loves you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, the ultimat expression of narcissim. Just because a machine can be programmed to &#8220;like&#8221; you doesn&#8217;t mean it does in reality. Machines are non-sentient, and I really doubt they ever will be otherwise. It&#8217;s no different than expecting a toaster to care if it burns breakfast.</p>
<p>Even if it were possible to &#8220;create&#8221; sentience, to &#8220;program&#8221; a robot to like you is an illusion. What makes love so siginificant is that the other person chooses to love you, without you making them love you. Which is the basic reason why real love is not the same as paying a prostitute to say she loves you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
