<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What? No 'Anonymous Cowards'?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070808/google-news-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070808/google-news-comments/</link>
	<description>by John Paczkowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:08:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: New Way to obtain &#8220;Correction&#8221; &#171; Connected</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070808/google-news-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-18060</link>
		<dc:creator>New Way to obtain &#8220;Correction&#8221; &#171; Connected</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070808/google-news-comments/#comment-18060</guid>
		<description>[...] While the example just provides further context to the news…why cannot this new feature be used to refute and self correct errors in articles? I think this is going to be a total disaster and you can see further commentary as to why here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While the example just provides further context to the news…why cannot this new feature be used to refute and self correct errors in articles? I think this is going to be a total disaster and you can see further commentary as to why here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monday Morning Quarterback: The Navel-Gazing Edition and Where iPhones Are Born &#124; BoomTown &#124; Kara Swisher &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070808/google-news-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Morning Quarterback: The Navel-Gazing Edition and Where iPhones Are Born &#124; BoomTown &#124; Kara Swisher &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070808/google-news-comments/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>[...] we masochistic to love the Google move to allow subjects in articles to comment right next to the news [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we masochistic to love the Google move to allow subjects in articles to comment right next to the news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Taylor</title>
		<link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070808/google-news-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 05:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070808/google-news-comments/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>The vetting is more subjective than just confirming ID - Google News Help says they will also accept comment from people they determine to be &quot;expert in the topic of the story&quot;.  

Who at Google News is making that decision and what are their criteria? Have they already been pitched by a PR agency?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The vetting is more subjective than just confirming ID &#8211; Google News Help says they will also accept comment from people they determine to be &#8220;expert in the topic of the story&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Who at Google News is making that decision and what are their criteria? Have they already been pitched by a PR agency?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
